Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just want to know if Jfly is someones alt. Big D can you confirm or deny that? The kid just seems to be making too many sh*t stirring comments.
Big D already confirmed that, by not banning him. Alts are not allowed and we all know D's watching him.
it is more fun to debate with people that are on the opposite side
ahhh what a coincidence you post this...haha....well if the cop did it then he should be canned and prosecuted. HMMMM but you get this article from one of the most liberal circulations in the U.S. How interesting.
Take a look at the local news in Summit County, CO.....looks like a victory for you! LMAO
Look at the event calendar to the right! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.summitdaily.com/SECTION/&Profile=1001&ParentProfile=1055
.
MPS-
i don't understand what influence the source has on the cop doing what he did. the summit daily may report with a liberal point of view but that doesn't change what the cop did. i don't agree with j-fly's opinion of police but please explain.
but it is more fun to debate with people that are on the opposite side
I just had a revalation! You are right about everything! We are on the same side now! We will never need to debate again!
See ya!![]()
Guy, you SERIOUSLY need to learn how to debate.
You don't just toss out BS and run with it. You back it up.
Generalizing on the scale you are is a liberal BS tactic that leads nowhere and accomplishes absolutely nothing but making you look like an azz.
If you want to debate, then put up information, not just trashing posts from your favorite liberal news paper.
"what the cop did" is a matter of perception at this point, specially that of the person who got 3rd hand information then reports it 4th hand.
It's the tendency of the public to take what they read from a paper as fact that is the problem here, as you inadvertantly did with your statement. "the summit daily may report with a liberal point of view but that doesn't change what the cop did"
You took a story from a self admitted liberal view paper and restated it as fact when really we have no facts at all, only what the paper wrote.
MPS-
i don't understand what influence the source has on the cop doing what he did. the summit daily may report with a liberal point of view but that doesn't change what the cop did. i don't agree with j-fly's opinion of police but please explain.
Like I stated, if the cop did what was reported he should have serious consequences.
I just noticed the article is from the Associated Press so maybe it isn't tainted with libbyism. My point is libbies tend not to like authority....number one example is J-Fly.
I don't know how many times I have been accused of BS by some criminal. I have always come out clean. So a McDonald's worker....very likely had been in trouble with the law...maybe a parolee says a cop brandished a weapon? Seems pretty fishy to me. There is always two sides to the story. If the cops partner backs the story up than the accused cop is screwed.
But, sounds like there is a lot more to the story....if the cop gets charged solely based on a McDonalds employee's statement....I have a real problem with that!
If the cop did this....he needs to be hammered and he embarrasses all good hard working cops if what happened is true.
Like I stated, if the cop did what was reported he should have serious consequences.
Amen brother
I just noticed the article is from the Associated Press so maybe it isn't tainted with libbyism.
i rest my case
My point is libbies tend not to like authority....
Liberals hate cops and republicans hate big government. no one on here likes authority
I don't know how many times I have been accused of BS by some criminal. I have always come out clean. So a McDonald's worker....very likely had been in trouble with the law...maybe a parolee says a cop brandished a weapon? Seems pretty fishy to me. There is always two sides to the story. If the cops partner backs the story up than the accused cop is screwed.
to be determined.....
But, sounds like there is a lot more to the story....if the cop gets charged solely based on a McDonalds employee's statement....I have a real problem with that!
so the mcdonald's accuser has less clout/social status/reputation than other people?
so the mcdonald's accuser has less clout/social status/reputation than other people?
Sorry man, I've got to call you on this one. While some McD's employees are less than reputable (like a few cops), I would say most are good kids with their first jobs. My daughter worked the drive thru in high school and she has no problem with cops. We need to be careful with the generalizations too.![]()
I'm not trying to generalize McDonald's employees at all....my point was there are a lot of individuals that work at fast food establishments that have been in trouble with the law. I was a parole officer at one time and a very high percentage of my caseload worked at fast food places....my point was it could very well be one of these individuals is trying to "get back."
Yes, I know there are a lot of good people that work at these places....kids, handicapped people, even ex-criminals that are honestly trying to change their lives.
Like I said....was not stereotyping or generalizing....but the fact is a lot of felons/criminals work in these places.
...but since it is in the paper....J-Fly has convicted him.
.
Typical cop mind set. Most people that work in fast food do not have criminal records. And the ones that do mostly have drug offenses or nonviolent crimes on their records. The real criminals are the politicians who make all these bull**** laws, and the thug cops who enforce them. Things like underage drinking, any traffic infraction, drugs, should not be criminal offenses.