Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Cops

Status
Not open for further replies.
Big D already confirmed that, by not banning him. Alts are not allowed and we all know D's watching him.

im just a SUPER VILLAIN

no really i just have some futuristic and revolutionary ideals

i have gone to a lot of forums where there are a lot of people who think like me, but it is more fun to debate with people that are on the opposite side

I guess im not your typical snowmobiler
 
ahhh what a coincidence you post this...haha....well if the cop did it then he should be canned and prosecuted. HMMMM but you get this article from one of the most liberal circulations in the U.S. How interesting.

Take a look at the local news in Summit County, CO.....looks like a victory for you! LMAO

Look at the event calendar to the right! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.summitdaily.com/SECTION/&Profile=1001&ParentProfile=1055


.

MPS-

i don't understand what influence the source has on the cop doing what he did. the summit daily may report with a liberal point of view but that doesn't change what the cop did. i don't agree with j-fly's opinion of police but please explain.
 
MPS-

i don't understand what influence the source has on the cop doing what he did. the summit daily may report with a liberal point of view but that doesn't change what the cop did. i don't agree with j-fly's opinion of police but please explain.


"what the cop did" is a matter of perception at this point, specially that of the person who got 3rd hand information then reports it 4th hand.


It's the tendency of the public to take what they read from a paper as fact that is the problem here, as you inadvertantly did with your statement. "the summit daily may report with a liberal point of view but that doesn't change what the cop did"

You took a story from a self admitted liberal view paper and restated it as fact when really we have no facts at all, only what the paper wrote.
 
Last edited:
but it is more fun to debate with people that are on the opposite side

Guy, you SERIOUSLY need to learn how to debate.
You don't just toss out BS and run with it. You back it up.
Generalizing on the scale you are is a liberal BS tactic that leads nowhere and accomplishes absolutely nothing but making you look like an azz.

If you want to debate, then put up information, not just trashing posts from your favorite liberal news paper.
 
I just had a revalation! You are right about everything! We are on the same side now! We will never need to debate again!

See ya!:D

No wait! Don't listen to him! I'm ready to sign on with your "futuristic and revolutionary ideals". How do I subscribe to the news letter?

Just out of curiosity, is it he fact that you question authority and the right of someone else to unilaterally punish and/or impose sanctions that makes your ideals so revolutionary?

Because if that's the case, my two year old is like some kind of rebel leader.
 
Last edited:
Guy, you SERIOUSLY need to learn how to debate.
You don't just toss out BS and run with it. You back it up.
Generalizing on the scale you are is a liberal BS tactic that leads nowhere and accomplishes absolutely nothing but making you look like an azz.

If you want to debate, then put up information, not just trashing posts from your favorite liberal news paper.

He's not debating with his "tatics", he's merely lighting the fuse and giggling at the fireworks display.
 
"what the cop did" is a matter of perception at this point, specially that of the person who got 3rd hand information then reports it 4th hand.


It's the tendency of the public to take what they read from a paper as fact that is the problem here, as you inadvertantly did with your statement. "the summit daily may report with a liberal point of view but that doesn't change what the cop did"

You took a story from a self admitted liberal view paper and restated it as fact when really we have no facts at all, only what the paper wrote.

sorry for the technicality. how about "what he was charged with?" and here's the original source if you want to read more:

http://cbs4denver.com/local/mcmenacing.saunders.mcdonalds.2.1093294.html
 
MPS-

i don't understand what influence the source has on the cop doing what he did. the summit daily may report with a liberal point of view but that doesn't change what the cop did. i don't agree with j-fly's opinion of police but please explain.

Like I stated, if the cop did what was reported he should have serious consequences.

I just noticed the article is from the Associated Press so maybe it isn't tainted with libbyism. My point is libbies tend not to like authority....number one example is J-Fly.

I don't know how many times I have been accused of BS by some criminal. I have always come out clean. So a McDonald's worker....very likely had been in trouble with the law...maybe a parolee says a cop brandished a weapon? Seems pretty fishy to me. There is always two sides to the story. If the cops partner backs the story up than the accused cop is screwed.

But, sounds like there is a lot more to the story....if the cop gets charged solely based on a McDonalds employee's statement....I have a real problem with that!

If the cop did this....he needs to be hammered and he embarrasses all good hard working cops if what happened is true.
 
Like I stated, if the cop did what was reported he should have serious consequences.

I just noticed the article is from the Associated Press so maybe it isn't tainted with libbyism. My point is libbies tend not to like authority....number one example is J-Fly.

I don't know how many times I have been accused of BS by some criminal. I have always come out clean. So a McDonald's worker....very likely had been in trouble with the law...maybe a parolee says a cop brandished a weapon? Seems pretty fishy to me. There is always two sides to the story. If the cops partner backs the story up than the accused cop is screwed.

But, sounds like there is a lot more to the story....if the cop gets charged solely based on a McDonalds employee's statement....I have a real problem with that!

If the cop did this....he needs to be hammered and he embarrasses all good hard working cops if what happened is true.

Sorry man, I've got to call you on this one. While some McD's employees are less than reputable (like a few cops), I would say most are good kids with their first jobs. My daughter worked the drive thru in high school and she has no problem with cops. We need to be careful with the generalizations too.:beer;
 
This thread has addressed a few instances of "Bad" officers, or "Bad" actions by officers, figured it only fair to share some of the other side in recent news.

Heroic Cops: Cleveland Police Officers do their Best to Rescue Unresponsive Man From Lake Erie

Hero cops help save dying man

Hero EMT, cops nab city’s thanks

Not all officers are in their position because of the power or authority it gives them over others. Letting a few instances generalize it for all is no better than the Enviros condemning ALL sledders for the actions of a few.
 
Like I stated, if the cop did what was reported he should have serious consequences.

Amen brother

I just noticed the article is from the Associated Press so maybe it isn't tainted with libbyism.

i rest my case

My point is libbies tend not to like authority....

Liberals hate cops and republicans hate big government. no one on here likes authority

I don't know how many times I have been accused of BS by some criminal. I have always come out clean. So a McDonald's worker....very likely had been in trouble with the law...maybe a parolee says a cop brandished a weapon? Seems pretty fishy to me. There is always two sides to the story. If the cops partner backs the story up than the accused cop is screwed.

to be determined.....

But, sounds like there is a lot more to the story....if the cop gets charged solely based on a McDonalds employee's statement....I have a real problem with that!

so the mcdonald's accuser has less clout/social status/reputation than other people?
 
so the mcdonald's accuser has less clout/social status/reputation than other people?

Nope, don't put words in my mouth....how would you feel if someone accused you of sexual assault and the police arrested you based on an accusation? That is my point....I'm saying there better be more evidence than just a damn accusation.

Yup I don't like big government not because of the authority, but because of the infringements of my freedom ....my freedoms given in the Constitution. Law enforcement protects the freedoms of everyone that they have been granted in the Constitution.....not the same! Not even close.

.
 
Last edited:
Sorry man, I've got to call you on this one. While some McD's employees are less than reputable (like a few cops), I would say most are good kids with their first jobs. My daughter worked the drive thru in high school and she has no problem with cops. We need to be careful with the generalizations too.:beer;

I'm not trying to generalize McDonald's employees at all....my point was there are a lot of individuals that work at fast food establishments that have been in trouble with the law. I was a parole officer at one time and a very high percentage of my caseload worked at fast food places....my point was it could very well be one of these individuals is trying to "get back."

Yes, I know there are a lot of good people that work at these places....kids, handicapped people, average adult joes, even ex-criminals that are honestly trying to change their lives.

Like I said....was not stereotyping or generalizing....but the fact is a lot of felons/criminals work in these places.

...but since it is in the paper....J-Fly has convicted him.

.
 
Last edited:
I'm not trying to generalize McDonald's employees at all....my point was there are a lot of individuals that work at fast food establishments that have been in trouble with the law. I was a parole officer at one time and a very high percentage of my caseload worked at fast food places....my point was it could very well be one of these individuals is trying to "get back."

Yes, I know there are a lot of good people that work at these places....kids, handicapped people, even ex-criminals that are honestly trying to change their lives.

Like I said....was not stereotyping or generalizing....but the fact is a lot of felons/criminals work in these places.

...but since it is in the paper....J-Fly has convicted him.

.

Typical cop mind set. Most people that work in fast food do not have criminal records. And the ones that do mostly have drug offenses or nonviolent crimes on their records. The real criminals are the politicians who make all these bull**** laws, and the thug cops who enforce them. Things like underage drinking, any traffic infraction, drugs, should not be criminal offenses.
 
Typical cop mind set. Most people that work in fast food do not have criminal records. And the ones that do mostly have drug offenses or nonviolent crimes on their records. The real criminals are the politicians who make all these bull**** laws, and the thug cops who enforce them. Things like underage drinking, any traffic infraction, drugs, should not be criminal offenses.

Typical liberal seeing what you want to see. I never said most McDonald's employees are criminals. I said it is very likely the person accusing this cop has a criminal record.

Oh so drug offenses don't harm anyone? Really!? What about the meth head that leaves his/her 2 year old son at home to starve and walk around with feces on the floor? HUH? I can't tell you how many children I have seen abused and neglected because parents are high and/or getting high! Or jumps in the car while tweaking and kills a family....or grabs a weapon because because he can't think straight and slices his wife's neck.... how about the mother that used meth while pregnant that left her baby handicapped for life? ....how bout the investigation I conducted personally when a woman smoking pot fell asleep and her joint burned down the house and killed her 4 year old son? ...what is your comeback for these? Typical libby attitude!

Underage drinking huh? Ya that is a great one too....you don't how many dead bodies I have scooped off the road from drunk teenagers! My own cousin was paralyzed for life when he was 17 and the rest of the people in the car died....they had all been drinking. I have dealt with teenage deaths from alcohol poisioning. Ya they are just BS laws! You have a one tracked self serving mind!

I protect society from people like you and I am honored to do it!

.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Premium Features



Back
Top