Thanks for your reply....
I have no doubt that your stand alone system is fantastic....there's no question that yours, motec, or even the mclaren system that nascar uses exceeds the capabilities of a stock polaris or general motors, etc system.
right!
My point is that the polaris fuel system is flawed in the way it applies fuel to the engine. Can a better control system make up for some of that? I have no doubt it can.
some experimentations can NOW be done since with our ecu, you control every aspects of that engine/fueling /charging system....can we find a better solution??
But if you think about it for a minute, Polaris struggled with carburation from 1998(Kiehin PWK 39mm's were very poorly tuned from factory), through to 2004(no air scews 02, major jetting swing 03,overly rich, etc), then got into efi and they have had tremendous engine troubles since then.
last year pro are running pretty good.....this year the engine demends more than 8 % more fuel across the rpm range and new injectors(we hope with a more stable flow!), i think it will be a good season again for the pro!
Four stroke engines have an extra two strokes for fuel to vapourize within....
and also anextra 150 poundd!!
two-strokes engines have always relied on the fuel mixture passing through the crankcase to accomplish this.
you are right....
So placing an injector one inch from the cylinder and expecting it to vapourize fuel as well as a throttle body mounted injector is asking a bit much.
humm, no better solution yet by any company....now with our ecu, if you want to experiment new idea you can....you have full conrol over the entire machine.
How do you make up for that?
we are selling a replacement unit for the pro not a re-engineered solution on a bad set-up design(according to you and you only!)
Add more fuel. How about poor fuel economy and failures on the thrust side of the piston with polaris 800s??
a 2 strokes is a 2 strokes , the beauty of it is 150 lbs less and super cold start,600$ to replace a burn down engine(vs 5000$ for a 4 stroke) and some FUN driving the sled....i do agree with you on the 4 stroke reliability, i have own several 300 hp nytro and i am going far more in the bush and climbing a lot more with a 200 hp pro than any other sled i had ever owned....the weight is killing the 4 strokes ....but in the sled market there is enough guys in favor of the 4 strokes and same for 2 strokes and that's hy we are all happy!
Maybe an abundance of unvapourized fuel??
maybe...
Anyhow, we've run better than a .9 sec 60ft with our 1000OM on ice, under ISR sanctioned rules and timing lights....what increase in response could we expect to see using your system?
well, let's just say our ECU sample rate is twice as fast as kokusan denki ECU
Respectfully
appeciated!