here is one for you to ponder ..
if you were to go to a book store ...inwhich catagory would you find the Bible ......Fiction...or Non Fiction ...
any questions .
Childrens fiction section !! lots of other god fairytales there too !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
here is one for you to ponder ..
if you were to go to a book store ...inwhich catagory would you find the Bible ......Fiction...or Non Fiction ...
any questions .
Childrens fiction section !! lots of other god fairytales there too !
I find it quite interesting how active many of the self proclaimed "non-believers" are in this thread.
I presume many of you actually do believe, but are simply posting thought provoking dialogue.
No I really dont believe! Religion and sience are full of half truths and misinterpretations, I feel that If the truth about mans existence on this planet where reveled we would all be suprised. this to me is like most debates .global warming ,dem or repulican , perspective is everything, and from where i sit religion has the least amont of credibility followed by sciencewhich as mentioned is nearly as guilty of preaching unproven theory as fact! there are many mysterys right here on earth that give us clues as to our origin but like most contreversial ideas people dont want to here it becuase it directly conflicts with there belifes .
how everything in this world is structered behind a leader
maybe in our little worlds, but if you are actually talking about the world it is not so. It is about cycles.
do you mean that you are gonna come back as a grasshopper or something ???
it doesn't, on all religions. you cant prove something dosen't exist if it really doesn't and is in your mind. god is more or less faith to people and thats fine.
people who sacrafice animals and people years ago to thier gods for in return good luck, is that a ok thing to do?? do you really think it helpped them. NO but in that time they did and after years you realize how silly it w
thats funny...."god is more or less faith to people and thats fine.".... you as well as all atheists are guilyt of the same charge you just leveled. you have faith but it is blind faith. and if you say you dont you are not being truthful.
now on to your first statement..." you cant prove something doesnt exist if it really doesnt...." i am going to be presumptous here but i think i am safe. you would admit that you are limited in your knowledge right? ok lets just say out of all the available knowledge(in the known world) you only know(i am going to be genereous) 1%. that leaves 99% that you do not know. since you admit that your knowledge is very limited how can you know that God does not exist in the 99% out side of your knowledge(1%) and experience? any answer other than an affirmation of the POSSIBILITY is illogical.
well said. Niether science nor religion has a complete answer. Both have thier problems in theories.....i just personally choose science has a stronger arguement. I think the logic is more on par. But like i said before, many crediable scientists have said they believe there is something else acting in this world that we have yet to find....
EDIT: For the record Mafesto, i dont believe. Used to, things happened, and i never will again.
since you admit that your knowledge is very limited how can you know that God does not exist in the 99% out side of your knowledge(1%) and experience?
any answer other than an affirmation of the POSSIBILITY is illogical.
doesnt it. first off who is we? is chemical science your expertise? if it is good. the rest is not your knowledge for the most part. chemical science, turtle communications(so on and so forth) is only a fraction of the available knowledge. you or anyone for that matter is very limited in knowledge. i was asking about his personal knowledge which i was being generous with 1%. are you saying you know more than that? if you are that is a very arrogant and erroneous(sp?) statement. and yes in general terms both questions are fair to pose(possibility of a god/possibility of no god). though the same rule of judgement is not used regarding them. i still contend that the burden of proof is left entirely(unjustifiably so) on the christian.Are you saying that we do not know that God does not exist in the knowledge that we don't have about chemical sciences (a part of the 99%) or about turtle communications (another random part of the 99%)? So if it is possible that there is a god, it must also be possible for there not to be a god.
seems fitting...
doesnt it. first off who is we? is chemical science your expertise? if it is good. the rest is not your knowledge for the most part. chemical science, turtle communications(so on and so forth) is only a fraction of the available knowledge. you or anyone for that matter is very limited in knowledge. i was asking about his personal knowledge which i was being generous with 1%. are you saying you know more than that? if you are that is a very arrogant and erroneous(sp?) statement. and yes in general terms both questions are fair to pose(possibility of a god/possibility of no god). though the same rule of judgement is not used regarding them. i still contend that the burden of proof is left entirely(unjustifiably so) on the christian.
We = people / human beings
Chemical science and turtle communications are not my expertise, I was using that as examples of the 99% Kind of funny how you seem to know how much people don't know, since you don't know how much there is to know if the first place. We (see above) could be at 1% or 10% or 0.0001%.
I think Donald Rumsfeld made a statement like that before, and was heavily criticized by the media for it.
your missing the point. it is a personal question(1%) but your trying to bring the whole(99%)into it. my point is to declare a universal negative based on 1% knowledge is illogical. we are limited by space and time among other things. have you been to jupiter to see if there is a god? no so it is a "possibility". so you see to say there is no god as if it is an irrevocable truth is unjustified.
my 99%/1% was just an analogy and can be broken down over time. any analogy can be. when i started posting in this thread i know i wouldnt be able to put up an unassailable arguement. i too am limited. but if you would just stick with what i am saying you would agree it has merit.
but if you would just stick with what i am saying you would agree it has merit.
Isn't that how every conversation is supposed to go?
maybe in our little worlds, but if you are actually talking about the world it is not so. It is about cycles.