Polaris offers a 3" lug track (series 7) with 7T 3" pitch drivers stock, so the conquer being 2.8" should have more than enough clearance with 7T drivers.
Conquer 280?
- Thread starter damx
- Start date
The Axys pro rmk's that comes stock with 3" track and 3" pitch drivers have a droped chaincase. Or are you talking about adding 3"track and 3" drivers to a 2.6 belt drive or 2.6 chaincase sled?
The axys 3" and sks have the same chaincase......
You sure about that. I don't think that is correct.
So far as I can tell... Polaris does not offer more than one chaincase for the AXYS-Mtn sleds.
.
.
Well, looks like you are right. I was sure the 174" and 163" 3inch track Pro Rmk's had a droped chaincase, but the Polaris part number says otherwise. Looks like clearance wont be a issue then.
http://parts.polarisind.com/OtherAssemblies.asp?partid=1333255
Thanks.
http://parts.polarisind.com/OtherAssemblies.asp?partid=1333255
Thanks.
^^^Will the belt drive 163" be able to fit the camso 280 162" without rail cutting? Or is it necessary to go to the 165" ?
The adjuster slot on your sled is 3" long. If you adjuster is anywhere in the middle of the slot with the 163. You can easily move the adjuster ahead .5". Be sides the 163" track isn't exactly 163" long and neither is the 162.
remember that your driver size will increase too in belt drives so it might be very tight
Well I guess I'll find out, just ordered the Conquer 280 15"x162"x2.8" 3"pitch with center drive Avid drivers.
I measured the adjustment screw and it had slightly less than 1/2" of forward adjustment, around 7/16"... So, tight sounds like an understatement. Well see how close to 163" and how much the thinner single ply conquer stretches.
I measured the adjustment screw and it had slightly less than 1/2" of forward adjustment, around 7/16"... So, tight sounds like an understatement. Well see how close to 163" and how much the thinner single ply conquer stretches.
Last edited:
Is the conquer dual durometer like the stock 2.6"?
L
luongo01
Active member
i see 163 axys with162 conquer 280 look tight on adjustment
View attachment 275282
and this 163 with 165 conquer 280
View attachment 275283
View attachment 275282
and this 163 with 165 conquer 280
View attachment 275283
TKI has an offset axle that allows the 165" to be properly tensioned. I just received and installed my today. It's hard anodized and fits perfectly. As usual, a great quality piece from TKI.
Here was mine before:
And after, with the TKI offset axle installed:
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Here was mine before:
And after, with the TKI offset axle installed:
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
I was told by the camso testers that track performs MUCH better with anti-stab
Wow, that looks perfect after the TKI offset axle install.
That's good to know, why do you think Burandt is running center drive drivers and no anti-stab on his build? Just maximum light weight?
That's good to know, why do you think Burandt is running center drive drivers and no anti-stab on his build? Just maximum light weight?
Similar threads
