Composit m67 track

[RMKillR]

Well I got about 1,200 miles on my 155x2.6 track. Couple damaged lugs, and the windows that are unclipped have some pretty good wear. Looking for reviews, input, pros cons if anyone has put the m67 track on and ridden it? Looking for a all around track similar to the 2.6 in several different snow conditions. Just looking for input on it or if I should just shop for another 2.6. Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[goridedoo]

I know very few guys have run any of the Talon tracks... especially in the states, I would think the CE 2.5 would be a good all around option that bolts right up and is priced well.

 

[RMKillR]

I know very few guys have run any of the Talon tracks... especially in the states, I would think the CE 2.5 would be a good all around option that bolts right up and is priced well.

Well it is offered 2.86 pitch and center porting for driver. And pricing seems decent. Sub $700


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[FEZ]

This is an excellent track.









SledHead Racing had a prototype on our '14 XM 154 last season. With over 600 mountain and MN miles there are no damaged lugs. This track works EXCELLENT in powder, but is soft. For '19 they have stiffened the durometer a touch to address this. We have a '19 156X15 2.62 sitting in the shop, awaiting install in the same sled. One of our regular riders has the 163 on his '10 Summit 860 as well and really likes it over the Poo 2.4 he had prior.











No it is not a 3", but with comparable riders/weights, this 14' kept up just fine with an 850 Doo 154 3" last season in 3+ft of pow. Also keep in mind this XM is in the 170+ HP area as well.

 

[RMKillR]

Would you say the m67 is for several different types of snow conditions?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[RMKillR]

Or how is the challenger extreme 2.5 in place of the stock 2.6?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Indy_500]

Or how is the challenger extreme 2.5 in place of the stock 2.6?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Equally as good in my opinion. 2.5 extreme is a Little bit better on more setup snow and a little bit worse in powder. Love mine. Have a few hundred miles on it this year and its still mint. I would've torn a few lugs already on a 2.6... lol

 

[FEZ]

Like above, I agree the 2.5 will be a little better in set up snow and a little trenchy in powder.


The M67 is far and a way a better powder track than either of these, but you give to get.




The 2.6 Poo is one hell of a good track for most conditions.

 

[RMKillR]

What about the peak 2.5 compared to the CE 2.5? Or composit m6.6


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[FrankTheTank]

M67 is more like Polaris Serie 6.
M66 is more like CE 2.5 but is heavier and might need lighter weights.
Ive had M66 and it can handle a lot beating!

 

[RMKillR]

M67 is more like Polaris Serie 6.

M66 is more like CE 2.5 but is heavier and might need lighter weights.

Ive had M66 and it can handle a lot beating!

M66 trench a little more than the series 6 Polaris track?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[FrankTheTank]

M66 trench a little more than the series 6 Polaris track?

Yes I think it does.
But M66 is stiffer and get better traction in set up snow.
You need to get good trackspeed, then the M66 climbs up well on the snow.
I ride a lot in packed/set up snow and like stiffer tracks with better traction. Peak 2.5 is great for that!