dems are all about more and more gov. and thus more and more debt. and although they preach less taxes how on earth will they pay for the programs??
Bilers for Obama--Important notice!!
- Thread starter revpilot
- Start date
dems are all about more and more gov. and thus more and more debt. and although they preach less taxes how on earth will they pay for the programs??
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
To me, it looks like Republicans like to spend more money and increase the national debt. Sorry about posting facts.
Yeah, that is a real bipartisan site!! Nice.
those are your words^^^. buuuuut your site isnt bipartisan... riiiiggghhht!
from what i see that graph shows exactly the problem. reagan and bush inherited one of the worst presidents ever.. clinton profited from one of the best presidents in history and yes now bush is dealing with the fruit of the clinton policies.
alright i will be fair... i still stand by my observation^^^... yes gwb has been a big spender and i dont like it!
those are your words^^^. buuuuut your site isnt bipartisan... riiiiggghhht!
from what i see that graph shows exactly the problem. reagan and bush inherited one of the worst presidents ever.. clinton profited from one of the best presidents in history and yes now bush is dealing with the fruit of the clinton policies.
alright i will be fair... i still stand by my observation^^^... yes gwb has been a big spender and i dont like it!
More importantly, who will McCain propose for Chief of Interior, and the Department of Agriculture. Whether Wilderness Bills come to either president's desk to sign, is a function of the House and Senate, and their subcommittees. And, with the composition of the legislative, Wilderness Bills are on the horizon. McCain has been said, to see himself in the light of Teddy Roosevelt, national parks and all. He wouldn't mind closing land (ie. saving the land
). It will happen, he will want to leave some legacy behind.Talking heads are mentioning Obama might pick Norm Dicks of Washington state and George Miller of California, both are liberal environmentalist. They also mention Brian Schweitzer, ex Montana Governor. They can repeat the Clinton era cleaning of all conservative forest and BLM managers. This did more to take land from s that anything. Interpretation of the rules, such as RWA and WSA, can create more defacto wilderness than congress has the stomach to do.
The same talking heads mention former Wyoming Gov. James Geringer, former Utah Gov. Michael Leavitt, and former Montana Gov. Marc Racicot, coming from McCain. And, Palin might be there to help guide a little. These guys might be better for us.
Also look for the Roadless Rules to fully reinstated, with Wilderness being a major requirement.
Last edited:
Was being lazy. Here is the actual website:
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt.htm
Total Change During Tenure
9/30/2008 10,024,724,896,912.40 4,217,261,484,712.34 Bush II
9/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06 1,395,974,529,060.68 Clinton
9/30/1993 4,411,488,883,139.38 1,554,057,922,952.06 Bush I
9/29/1989 2,857,430,960,187.32 1,859,575,960,187.32 Reagan
9/30/1981 997,855,000,000.00 299,015,000,000.00 Carter
9/30/1977 698,840,000,000.00 345,119,746,158.59 Nixon/Ford
6/30/1969 353,720,253,841.41 64,749,315,231.36 Kennedy/Johnson
6/30/1961 288,970,938,610.05
Who looks like tax and spend? Clinton's 8 years increased less than Bush I's 4 years and less than Reagan's.
Last edited:
Wait until obama gets done spending money on all of his sweet heart deals. Oreilly said today the deficite would be 5 Trillion if oblubber would make 2 terms. What do the dumb demmys say to that? Esp when the unemployment lines are long.
NICE!!! How many remember the Carter years? Or that Reagan brought some b@lls back to the White House. Then the halocaust set in motion by Clinton. Too bad Roe v. Wade wasn't around in 1960. We might not be going through this now
More importantly, who will McCain propose for Chief of Interior, and the Department of Agriculture. Whether Wilderness Bills come to either president's desk to sign, is a function of the House and Senate, and their subcommittees. And, with the composition of the legislative, Wilderness Bills are on the horizon. McCain has been said, to see himself in the light of Teddy Roosevelt, national parks and all. He wouldn't mind closing land (ie. saving the land
Talking heads are mentioning Obama might pick Norm Dicks of Washington state and George Miller of California, both are liberal environmentalist. They also mention Brian Schweitzer, ex Montana Governor. They can repeat the Clinton era cleaning of all conservative forest and BLM managers. This did more to take land from s that anything. Interpretation of the rules, such as RWA and WSA, can create more defacto wilderness than congress has the stomach to do.
The same talking heads mention former Wyoming Gov. James Geringer, former Utah Gov. Michael Leavitt, and former Montana Gov. Marc Racicot, coming from McCain. And, Palin might be there to help guide a little. These guys might be better for us.
Also look for the Roadless Rules to fully reinstated, with Wilderness being a major requirement.
You are only a state away and you are saying "ex-gov Schweitzer"? He is running now. Sorry, you just lost credibility right there.
http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2008/10/24/news/state/21-poll.txt
Anyway, the position doesn't open till January. A guy can still pull for Roy, and hope, can't he?
Last edited:
Like thats going to be the cure all in an Obama administration and a supermajority in both houses....Daaaa join brc. He who controls this....controls the legislation that passes through. In other words..we're screwed.
I'll bet anyone that within two years, we'll lose riding in the national parks.
We'll be lucky if we aren't confined to trail riding only, in the national forest. The national parks are goners.
wow 2001400ex is making me loose faith in society, are people getting fukin retarded. I think anyone who disagrees with 2001 should be able to kick him stright in the box if nobama F's this country to dog chit. wow
S
shortstop20
Well-known member
How does the Supreme Court have the ability to restrict riding areas? The president does have a say whether you realize it or not. I owned your *** on this topic whether you admit it or not.
S
shortstop20
Well-known member
I would bet you $100 that you're wrong but in 30 years when it happens a $100 bill will be worth nothing.
wow 2001400ex is making me loose faith in society, are people getting fukin retarded. I think anyone who disagrees with 2001 should be able to kick him stright in the box if nobama F's this country to dog chit. wow
I wil take you up on that! But then I get to kick all ya'll in the junk if I am right!
Hey 2001400. One lady she is a rep in helena. She said if oblubber wins Brian will become Energy Sec. for obama. Bolinger becomes Gov. Time will tell, So i call him x Gov.
wow 2001400ex is making me loose faith in society, are people getting fukin retarded. I think anyone who disagrees with 2001 should be able to kick him stright in the box if nobama F's this country to dog chit. wow
Living in the same town with this guy is bad. I am moving.
This guy never commented on the problems with our local city council. What is your tax bill 2001400??????
Pretty sure I already admitted to it in a different post. I am now your slave. You want cream in your coffee, sir?
I'll bet you $100 that we will always be able to ride in our National Forests.
S
shortstop20
Well-known member
McCain is strongly against earmarks and he has never put an earmark into a bill. Sounds hard to believe with the elected officials we have today.
.....but it's true.
