Big Pharma

[YAMA S]

@polaris dude
Yes they've gotten better at not KILLING their patients. I would hope so being chemo/radiation has been around since the 50's. All I'm saying is there's more options out there that most people never hear about.

Would you like to tell me why our government drags a guy like Dr. Burzynski into court time & time again to shut his cancer treatment center down?? He's got safe proven non toxic cancer treatments that DON'T harm the host. It doesn't seem to me the government has our best interest in mind.

This is a multi billion dollar business between the doctors, drug companies, cancer treatment centers & not to mention ALL the so called cancer non-profits.
Do you think any of these really want things to change other than maybe the GOOD doctors.

 

[mold]

Well, people call me crazy every single day
Yeah, looking for a ring dang doo
But I don't care what the people may say
No, looking for a ring dang doo
I don't know what it looks like or what it can do
I keep looking for that ring dang doo

 

[polaris dude]

@polaris dude
Yes they've gotten better at not KILLING their patients. I would hope so being chemo/radiation has been around since the 50's. All I'm saying is there's more options out there that most people never hear about.

Would you like to tell me why our government drags a guy like Dr. Burzynski into court time & time again to shut his cancer treatment center down?? He's got safe proven non toxic cancer treatments that DON'T harm the host. It doesn't seem to me the government has our best interest in mind.

This is a multi billion dollar business between the doctors, drug companies, cancer treatment centers & not to mention ALL the so called cancer non-profits.
Do you think any of these really want things to change other than maybe the GOOD doctors.

I can say with nearly 100% confidence that a majority of doctors do in fact want to cure cancer. There aren't too many doctors that specialize in cancer. As far as I am aware once cancer has been diagnosed the doctor simply gives the patient the list of options (unless said doctor is a surgeon).

As for thinking big pharma is toying around don't you think that someone would blow the whistle if they were told to pretend to research drugs? Don't you think it would be highly profitable for the first company to find a cure for cancer? Now I could see pharma searching in the wrong direction(toxic vs nontoxic methods) or perhaps even preventing the legalization of marijuana so they can sell more OTC pain meds(like Tylenol or Ibuprofen, but I hope that they couldn't be so greedy as to withhold something that they know can cure cancer.

 

[YAMA S]

I can say with nearly 100% confidence that a majority of doctors do in fact want to cure cancer. There aren't too many doctors that specialize in cancer. As far as I am aware once cancer has been diagnosed the doctor simply gives the patient the list of options (unless said doctor is a surgeon).

As for thinking big pharma is toying around don't you think that someone would blow the whistle if they were told to pretend to research drugs? Don't you think it would be highly profitable for the first company to find a cure for cancer? Now I could see pharma searching in the wrong direction(toxic vs nontoxic methods) or perhaps even preventing the legalization of marijuana so they can sell more OTC pain meds(like Tylenol or Ibuprofen, but I hope that they couldn't be so greedy as to withhold something that they know can cure cancer.

I'll give you most of the doctors are in our best interest all be it most of them are no different than the corner drug dealer. Big Pharma is about making their bottem line better & better at anyone's expense. When it comes to profitability you ever hear "if its not broke don't fix it" As for someone that works for them blowing the whistle, good luck on that. The non-disclosure forms alone prevent anyone from coming out against them.

Last but not least I also find it very suspicious the heads of the FDA swap back and forth between Big Pharm companies & the FDA. This makes it very easy to keep the status quo.

I'll put it to you this way. If I got diagnosed with cancer tomorrow I WOULDN'T be receiving chemo/radiation. I will however be taking something that's green & has zero bad side effects.

 

[skidoorulz]

Are you serious Yama? Non disclosure forms stopping someone from coming out against their employer? Guess they forgot to get Snowden to sign his, didn't they. A signature on a piece of paper means absolutely nothing.

 

[mold]

Are you serious Yama? Non disclosure forms stopping someone from coming out against their employer? Guess they forgot to get Snowden to sign his, didn't they. A signature on a piece of paper means absolutely nothing.

It does if I sign it-as does a handshake.

 

[Idcatman3]

It does if I sign it-as does a handshake.

Would it if you were being asked to cover up something you knew was killing people?

 

[mold]

Would it if you were being asked to cover up something you knew was killing people?

^^^^there would be no signature (agreement) to begin with. My soul is not for sale.

 

[Idcatman3]

^^^^there would be no signature (agreement) to begin with. My soul is not for sale.

I'm assuming you wouldn't have known about anything untoward before starting the job.

 

[mold]

I'm assuming you wouldn't have known about anything untoward before starting the job.

Good assumption.

 

[beard]

the fda is a corporation. a corporation has one purpose in life, and that is to make money....if cancer was cured, the fda would die....and they can t have that now can they. it's like there choosing jobs over a cure..

 

[YAMA S]

Are you serious Yama? Non disclosure forms stopping someone from coming out against their employer? Guess they forgot to get Snowden to sign his, didn't they. A signature on a piece of paper means absolutely nothing.

You think you can just walk out of their labs with any evidence? Their security is better than the NSA! You walk in with nothing but a lab coat and you leave the same way. My cousin worked for Pfizer for about 2 months he said you'd have better luck sneaking guns into the whitehouse then trying to get anything out of their labs.

 

[X2Freeride]

Chemo is like this...

Say you have rats in your house and you want to get rid of them....they're really bad.

SO... you have a bomber fly over and drop a bomb on the house... It kills all the rats hopefully... but now you have to rebuild the house, and it's never quite the same as before.



.

And in some cases all the rats arent even dead.

 

[skidoorulz]

You think you can just walk out of their labs with any evidence? Their security is better than the NSA! You walk in with nothing but a lab coat and you leave the same way. My cousin worked for Pfizer for about 2 months he said you'd have better luck sneaking guns into the whitehouse then trying to get anything out of their labs.

You really are a conspiracy theorist aren't you. You can't leave what is in your brain there. If there truly was something fishy going on, someone would say something. Someone would leave there and go home and keep a log of what went on everyday. They would write down times and dates and names and what was discovered and what was kept hidden. You can't deny that. As Polaris Dude stated. Cancer is in everyone from the day they are born. Cells sometimes whack out (much like some people here) when that happens the only way to "cure" cancer is to kill the cells that are whacking out. Sometimes this can not be done and people die. There will never be a true cure for cancer, only better ways to fight it. Oh and by the way oooouuuuu eeeeee oooouuuu. I better get my tinfoil hat out of the closet.

 

[Snowmow]

I'll tell you who's working for the FDA. It's that damned Sasquatch!!!

 

[Snowmow]

And this guy

 

[YAMA S]

You really are a conspiracy theorist aren't you. You can't leave what is in your brain there. If there truly was something fishy going on, someone would say something. Someone would leave there and go home and keep a log of what went on everyday. They would write down times and dates and names and what was discovered and what was kept hidden. You can't deny that. As Polaris Dude stated. Cancer is in everyone from the day they are born. Cells sometimes whack out (much like some people here) when that happens the only way to "cure" cancer is to kill the cells that are whacking out. Sometimes this can not be done and people die. There will never be a true cure for cancer, only better ways to fight it. Oh and by the way oooouuuuu eeeeee oooouuuu. I better get my tinfoil hat out of the closet.

If these companies and our government are so good and on the up-n-up then why would they continually attack a guy like Dr. Burzynski who's got a 60% cure rate on cancers that before him killed 100%? Why would they continually drag him into court to shut him down?

If they really wanted to find a cure don't you think Dr. Burzynski would be praised... Not vilified? If you believe in the good hearted nature of BIG government & HUGE multi-national corporations. Then your both naive & ignorant.

 

[skidoorulz]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burzynski_Clinic

 

[YAMA S]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burzynski_Clinic

Haha....lol.... Your putting all your eggs in Wikipedia theirs your trophy

 

[polaris dude]

@Beard. Yes I've also seen this one. Dr. Burzynski has done a phenomenal job in his treatment of cancers that other won't touch. He's got about a 60% cure rate on cancers that usually kill almost 100%. He uses direct gene therapy in his office. The government has been screwing with him since he's started because he uses treatments in a way that's not approved by "Big Brother". Our government has drug this man into court time & time again trying to shut him down. If this doesn't at least tweak your brain that there's alot more BS out there then I don't know what will.

I dare anyone to watch the first 3:33 on beards post and try not to shed a tear!! And listen to what he says about his daughter... She died from chemo/radiation not cancer.

So, besides the video can you find any evidence that he does infact have a 60% cure rate? I've searched him for like 10 minutes trying to see if there is anything substantial to his name that he as accomplished and thus far all I have found is that his testing thus far in woefully inadequate and incomplete. This is why the government and FDA is shutting him down. His methods are a form of chemotherapy from what I have read and his trials have been discontinued because the side effects of it potentially killed one of his patients.


and as far as people signing nondisclosure acts I am sure it would get out somehow even if it was from a deathbed. people don't like taking secrets to the grave these days.