I am indeed going into the field of pharmacy. As such, I don't care how someone gets better, only that they do. I like to think I am not biased towards or against anything as long as there are credible sources and proper research done.
As to the credibility of your sources the website itself is www.whale.to? what the heck is that exactly? It sounds like a website someone set up from their home. Even many .com sites I don't find that credible(yet I did use cancertutor.com because it seemed like it wasn't biased towards or against drugs/natural cures).
I did not miss your post about Dr. Nieper, but I don't understand why one doctor would have tremendous success and yet no other doctors do? If he knew something other people did not why didn't he teach it? Or, if cesium chloride did work that well why don't other doctors have the same amount of success as him?
If you have more sources post them up. I am always interested in possible new methods to treat people. As far as the FDA how can you fault them for the system that is in place. Do you think they should do the studies themselves? Those are by far the most expensive part of creating a new drug so unless you plan on increasing our deficit spending by many billions that is not an option. The studies themselves are pretty hard to mess up anyway and it is not like they can fake the study either. There are 3 steps to getting a drug approved(animal testing, small dose in healthy people, and then treating actually ill people) and it is really difficult to actually get a drug through. Not to mention this entire process can take up to 10 years and any small over looked detail can send the drug back to square one with reformulation. All things considered I think they do as good of a job as anyone can hope.
As to the credibility of your sources the website itself is www.whale.to? what the heck is that exactly? It sounds like a website someone set up from their home. Even many .com sites I don't find that credible(yet I did use cancertutor.com because it seemed like it wasn't biased towards or against drugs/natural cures).
I did not miss your post about Dr. Nieper, but I don't understand why one doctor would have tremendous success and yet no other doctors do? If he knew something other people did not why didn't he teach it? Or, if cesium chloride did work that well why don't other doctors have the same amount of success as him?
If you have more sources post them up. I am always interested in possible new methods to treat people. As far as the FDA how can you fault them for the system that is in place. Do you think they should do the studies themselves? Those are by far the most expensive part of creating a new drug so unless you plan on increasing our deficit spending by many billions that is not an option. The studies themselves are pretty hard to mess up anyway and it is not like they can fake the study either. There are 3 steps to getting a drug approved(animal testing, small dose in healthy people, and then treating actually ill people) and it is really difficult to actually get a drug through. Not to mention this entire process can take up to 10 years and any small over looked detail can send the drug back to square one with reformulation. All things considered I think they do as good of a job as anyone can hope.
