typical Spineless neg repper hhahhahahahahahahahaha
and so begins the reign of obama
- Thread starter snowrodeo
- Start date
I said I was a little harsh in my 1st response. Chill the f out!! I really get tired of tough guy internet noob crap! I'm not happy about the plan either, but your simply delusional thinking YOU know what McCain was going to do or not do regarding this bill. You can (I'm not)argue the point from now to the end time but we'll never know will we? In other words wtf is the point?????
View attachment 48521
By this time next year we hope that most of you "guys" will notice a pattern.
I'm certainly not going to argue with you on that. I'm sure you are right.
It's a no brainer that we will see a major shift.
It's a no brainer that we will see a major shift.
The point is this. Insanity = Doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results. Voting for a Dem is just that, insanity, every chance they get they will close off access. Expecting anything different this time is just insanity.I said I was a little harsh in my 1st response. Chill the f out!! I really get tired of tough guy internet noob crap! I'm not happy about the plan either, but your simply delusional thinking YOU know what McCain was going to do or not do regarding this bill. You can (I'm not)argue the point from now to the end time but we'll never know will we? In other words wtf is the point?????
View attachment 48521
Go back and read my post and you will see no mention of McCain. Your insertion of McCain into the argument is only an attempt to defelct what the point of the post really was. Spin it any way you want but the fact remains there will be more aggressive attempts by the libs to close more lands. The balance of this is always through the courts as that is where the laws are challenged and decided. The libs know the American public when it gets the facts really does not want total access denied. So they go around spewing flawed studies or studies conducted before new technology was used, and then use the courts to get their way. At the very least voting for the candidates that support the courts being interpreters of the law and not makers of law is the way to go. By the way, the candidates that believe in this ideology are not Liberal Democrats.
About the internet tough guy comment, go back and look at your posts. Most every one is littered with BOLD letters, exclaimnation points following veiled profanity. I guess it's easier for you to try and quash the opposition with the internet tough guy routine rather than express a well thought out position. I may be a noob to you because I don't post here all the time but that dosen't mean I haven't been around this site for many years.
Touche'
Wow you really have a boner for me don’t you!?!?!?
I have a hunch you often repeat this concept of calling people who vote Dem insane. You possibly do it on websites, other locals and the like. Are you expecting a different result by calling Dems insane?? Are you following ??
As for me inserting McCain, I did, I figured it played into your line of thinking partially!? My Bad!
The rest of your diatribe I generally agree with, the libs will attempt to close/protect the environment more than Reps. That has been true for longer than I’ve been alive. The unsubstantiated facts/studies you mention could be argued either way. I’m surely not informed enough to argue in true detailed fact these matters and I doubt you are either. Come to think of it. There is a possible trend in your behavior taking shape again. It is possible (not absolute) that you again often repeat “So they go around spewing flawed studies or studies conducted before new technology was used, and then use the courts to get their way” when ever you get a chance. What (different) result are you looking for insaneing that, I mean in saying that! That can’t be your idea of expressing a well thought out position can it?
As for the internet tough guy comment, If you would have actually gone back and read all my comments you would have seen the following.
Good question. It is certainly possible but it is just as likely to go the other way as well. As for my comment to the bman, A bit harsh!! Sorry the bman! Welcome to the forum!
Quote:
Originally Posted by framus
Gee whiz, if McCain had won and this turd came across his desk (IN ANY FORM) do think he may have VETOed the bill? Ya know the President has that power? Isn't telling the noob to STFU a little much?
All this going on and on about this is really like pizz’n up a rope!! I don’t know about you but I don’t Pizz up ropes.
I have a hunch you often repeat this concept of calling people who vote Dem insane. You possibly do it on websites, other locals and the like. Are you expecting a different result by calling Dems insane?? Are you following ??
As for me inserting McCain, I did, I figured it played into your line of thinking partially!? My Bad!
The rest of your diatribe I generally agree with, the libs will attempt to close/protect the environment more than Reps. That has been true for longer than I’ve been alive. The unsubstantiated facts/studies you mention could be argued either way. I’m surely not informed enough to argue in true detailed fact these matters and I doubt you are either. Come to think of it. There is a possible trend in your behavior taking shape again. It is possible (not absolute) that you again often repeat “So they go around spewing flawed studies or studies conducted before new technology was used, and then use the courts to get their way” when ever you get a chance. What (different) result are you looking for insaneing that, I mean in saying that! That can’t be your idea of expressing a well thought out position can it?
As for the internet tough guy comment, If you would have actually gone back and read all my comments you would have seen the following.
Good question. It is certainly possible but it is just as likely to go the other way as well. As for my comment to the bman, A bit harsh!! Sorry the bman! Welcome to the forum!
Quote:
Originally Posted by framus
Gee whiz, if McCain had won and this turd came across his desk (IN ANY FORM) do think he may have VETOed the bill? Ya know the President has that power? Isn't telling the noob to STFU a little much?
All this going on and on about this is really like pizz’n up a rope!! I don’t know about you but I don’t Pizz up ropes.
Last edited:
Similar threads
