Again I mostly agree with you. I love boost. Especially at high elevation. It’s the only way to go there. I’ve not ridden a 9R… none of the guys I ride with have them. Why would they when the cost difference is minimal and we do most of our riding from 9-11k?Definitely still a market for N/A sleds. I think the 9R sold really well first year based on hype. 2nd year not so much. Don’t see many 24 9R’s on the mountain lots on dealership floors.
Everyone I talked to that’s owns one says the same thing about the 9R it’s good but it’s not a boost. Boost will fix your bad line choice or make it even worse I suppose [emoji23] have a few buddies that went back to the boost after one season of 9R ownership.
I can be completely wrong I just don’t think Doo will offer two N/A options when there turbo sells so well. We will get a big displacement motor sooner than later they just won’t mess around it will be Turbo and N/A.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also agree with Terry that the bottom end of the 850 etec is already excellent.
I still think Doo will respond to the 9R. Not sure what with, maybe we see a return of a 1000? One that doesn’t suck of course I know there’s always talk that going much past an 850 can really make for a heavy feel, which would defeat the whole purpose of NA… but what if a guy could minimize that and get a little closer to bridging the gap between the NAs and the turbo? Especially under 8k (boost will always rule up high). I guess the idea of a big bore Doo kind of excites me… I think they could do it much better than Polaris. Time will tell.
Totally out of my wheelhouse, but it will be interesting to see how emissions requirements(politics) affect things going forward. I’m sure thats in the back of the minds of the mfgs and will influence what direction they want to go in the near term.