Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with the death penalty but in real life its dumb because it costs way too much money with appeals and whatnot.
Hmmmm can anyone guess what my opinion is?
Hey Tim....I am really curious what yours is....you wanna chime in?
Sldgy....you're an alright guy in my book...but I am really curious what you think too. No I won't flame ya...just curious. LOL
There are the far left nuts on here that I am sure will have an extreme opinion soon.
Revenge......justifiable. If I have to avenge my family and God see's it a sin, send me to he!!. At least I did what is right. I got even. Eye..............for an eye.
i have no problem with the death penalty as punishment for a capital offense....i have considerable problems with law inforcement that jumps to conclusions, with district attorneys doing the same.....i know the reliability of "eye witnesses"....it is of great concern to me that men have spent nearly their whole lives in prison based upon errors and malfesance of the above humans who made errors and lazy/easy assumptions about the guilt of a suspect, only to be later proved totally wrong by dna, new forensics, recanted testimony, etc.......hence, the need for a long period of time between conviction and execution....to allow for these things to come forward....it was not long ago that the statistics of men convicted of rape/murder that were later proved conclusively innocent from the states of illinois and texas came to light....it was shocking how many were wrongly accused and convicted, some spent 30 years in prison.....so until the legal system can show me that they can be 100% in their evidence, until "eye witnesses" can be shown infallible, and until the honesty and integrity of the law enforcement/legal prosecutor can be shown to be above reproach, i must reluctantly stand with no death penalty
yep, 30 years ago is the dark ages.
With the tech we have today, it is rare (incredibly so) that anyone who isn't guilty is put on death row. DNA testing is correcting a lot of the wrongly accused.
But essentially what you are saying is, you will never be for the death penalty?
So lets say your wife/kid is killed. They tell you the dna is proof positive. Your neighbor saw the guy do it and an officer caught him with the gun.
You wouldn't let them go for the death penalty?
yep, 30 years ago is the dark ages.
With the tech we have today, it is rare (incredibly so) that anyone who isn't guilty is put on death row. DNA testing is correcting a lot of the wrongly accused.
But essentially what you are saying is, you will never be for the death penalty?
So lets say your wife/kid is killed. They tell you the dna is proof positive. Your neighbor saw the guy do it and an officer caught him with the gun.
You wouldn't let them go for the death penalty?
No pick me... I would love to have that job, Trigger Man. The policy should be If you kill somebody we will kill you back!!! and the same goes with the child molesters and rapists because they have any incureable problem that death would be the only cure, I don't have a problem with taking them straight from the court to the injection table or the chair. It would ween out a lot of the BS I would think?
There are a fair share of people who wouldn't!! It's not going to change anything or bring back a loved one!!![]()
Yes it will change things.
It will ensure the cockroach will never hurt anyone again.
It will ensure some bleeding heart liberal will never come up with some BS reason to let them loose again.
And yes, I will be first in line to be the exacutioner.
Crime no longer has any real punishment.
You kill someone and it's not self defence, I will help you set up the gallow.
And if you think I am just a big talker, you don't know me very well.
Alrighty then........ make that 2 sick phuks!! Then again, I already knew that about you!!![]()