are there a bunch of crack smokers here...i own a new m7 and a 1997 rmk mod and the 700 a/c does ride nicer on the bumps and tkaing the big air thats it...the poo eats the m7 for lunch all day long....in climbs,straight out drags,boondocking etc...the new sled is a big disapointment.....i bought the mod used and can part it out for more than i paid and it has been spot on reliable with the added cost of 110 and tinkering to change altitude is abit more work when changing riding areas,but the m7 eats oils like a pig at $40 a gal that makes a days riding cost the same and when i sell it i am going to lose cash big..not to mention the mod gets better fuel economy.....i rode with all new sleds this year xp's m1000's nitro's and i tried them all....imo i will take the old iron..the warranty is nice but if they dont break then what good is warranty(994 miles not a prob...mod has 6000 and running strong).....i will take a bb mod right now straight up trade for my m7.....so i am going to strongly disagree the new sleds are hit or miss on reliability....the 2 xp's in the group lots of problems,nitro good bottom end not enough on the top and heavy,m's sh!tty handling in anythnig but powder...so for cost to permformance used bb mod for 6 or under to 9+ for new stock...my money is going to another used mod .....x
I see where you're going with this, but let's compare apples to apples. Figure out how much was spent on your old mod, convert that to "today's dollars", spend that on your current stocker and tell me what will outperform what. I'm not saying you're wrong, because I do agree with alot of what you said. To make a fair comparasin, you have to make all things equal.
As for reliability, if it has tits, tires or burns gas, you're gonna have problems... Sooner or later.