If twins were better Polaris or Doo would already be using them. There is good reason they are not using them.
But whatever. Drop the coin bring a rope.. [emoji849]
I disagree. OEMs will always use a (very) conservative "stock" pipe. They won't tune it to it's capability. And there is a very good reason for that. They must meet the biggest clientele needs... aiming for the center of the bell curve...the general masses.
And then there's always the EPA.
Twins are "better" in my experience.
The manufacturers haven't run them because offering those don't meet the needs of the general market. They can't justify mass-producing twin pipes for relatively small market.
I do not believe it reflects a lack of confidence in what twins can do for performance.
Twins just aren't for most people.
YES, they make more heat, can melt plastic and can be hard to fit.
BUT, they flow way better and make more torque and power than stock or any single pipe setup.
I've studied pipe Dyno sheets for a lot of years.
I've run stock single pipes, cut and modified stock singles, aftermarket singles and LOTS of twins over the last 20 years.
I ran twins on my carbed sleds from 2000 until 2012. I loved every minute of them.
I stopped running twins when I bought a 2013 only because twins were not offered any more.
I can tell you, naturally aspirated, I made more power and gave up no more reliability or runnability issues with my twins.
I was always clutched and jetted for conditions and elevation as the season or trip required.
I wasn't a "hood open all the time" person.
My twins weren't anymore "peaky", "finicky" or "unreliable" than the stock pipe for me.
With electronic mapping now days... holy cow, I suspect SLP will have a lot of satisfied twin customers.
Time will tell.