That 2.1" trim would make a HUGE diff in the Bend Spring snow... wouldn't you think Rob???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good points from Fbomb and Oberti.
On my pro with boost, i mixed 1 gallon race fuel each tank. Ran 1000 miles before had to replace reeds. Ran it from 2k feet all the way to 12k feet. Boondockers was great to keep it up to date with the latest programming.
Next years platform will be rock solid, with extra injectors to cool temps, will help save reeds.
Anyhow, have a buddy that has a really good running sled set up by SLP. Still has to add a little race fuel.
$ for $ the pump gas turbo is the best investment for fun.
The pro turbo sled has been relatively maintenance free (reeds, clutch cleaning, spark plugs).
My m8 pump gas turbo has been absolutely bullet proof. run it at 7.5lbs boost all day long. True pump gas performance (non ethnol of course) And i would run that sled against any 860, 900, SLP set up sled out there at any elevation. It just flat rips.
It made a difference ALL SEASON LONG! Deep light, deep heavy, slush, hard pan...didn't seem to matter. Improved the sled universally. Same theory as always doesn't matter on the snow conditions. The stiffer lugged 2011 version of the 5.1 was identical in performance without screw inserts to the previous version with them.
Are you runnig the same set up as Lingo?
SXviper...I met with a guy in Bend over Memorial Day weekend and he has a 2011 PRO with nitrous all else was stock. (don't know how he was clutched but I assume they tinkered with it in some fashion..him and his buddy are accomplished performance guys) Now obviously there are different kits and amounts you could throw at them so this is just one limited circumstance.
Our demo PRO with a $300 13.6 power addiction head, carl's clutching, and a trimmed to 2.1" stock 5.1 track was pretty much dominating the nitrous sled. Stock exhaust and no control box. We made over 10 comparison run tests on a drag strip at 660ft (6250 elevation 30*). He tried all kinds of variations of how he applied the nitrous. Some performed or equaled improvements but NONE were what you would call conclusively better then just adding compression and good clutching with a superior performing traction device.
By the end of this weekend I"m pretty sure he is going to duplicate our setup on his 2012 rather then messing with nitrous.
Not at all saying there isn't a place for nitrous or that it can't be a nice performance plus at the end of a big climb or super deep conditions that have eaten your HP at alt but it wouldn't be the first aspect of money for superior performance on these setups.
Dustin; Are you guys messing around with the timing like in the Dyno Tech article , I am interested to see the real world effects of these cheaper mods.