First off, I'm new to sledding, having just gotten into it last season. The wife & I bought sleds new enough that we'd be able to tell if we enjoy sledding yet cheap enough that if we didn't, no big deal. She has an '08 Summit Adrenaline (Rev) and I got an '07 M8 162 with some mods (can, running boards, seat) - all paid for. Fast forward one year later and we're looking to get her a new sled due to hers being a little rough and not really worth messing with. While shopping, I found her a great sled and also happened to find another in the same area that I'm interested in. I'm conflicted over whether I should upgrade or not.
I spent some time & cash over the summer refurbing my M8 (new DD, new primary & belt, rebuilt secondary, rebuilt Floats, new suspension bushings, etc.) and it's much improved over last season and I do really like the sled as it's been reliable and not at all temperamental, but I want to get into technical tree riding and I just can't seem to get the thing on edge very well...or hold it there. Obviously being new, there is a significant learning curve and we're typically riding with the kid, so I haven't been able to get too far off the trail, but I can't help but wonder if upgrading the sled will pay dividends in shortening the learning curve. Am I at a significant disadvantage with older iron? I was planning to upgrade next season, but an opportunity has presented itself...
The sled I'm looking at is a '17 RMK Pro (Axys) 174 with an aftermarket turbo. It's $8k and has <2k miles on it. It's appealing because the chassis is allegedly miles above the M and I like the idea of being able to have traction at all times, being able to pick my way through the trees and spend more time riding vs digging out. The turbo tempers any worries I had about the track having too much traction when a little spinning is needed and the couple hours I've spent researching so far alleviates any concern over the sled feeling too long compared to my 162. I'm on the fence because it's a significant expense and I don't have a good read on the benefit.
For reference, I'm 6'1", 215lb. Probably 240-250 suited up. I live in central Montana, riding the local mtns on the regular, but 4-5 hrs from West/IP, which is the ultimate goal - hope to go at least once per month after I stop sucking enough to make the trip worth it! Local snow conditions should be similar to West & IP, but less of it.
My goal for next season was to be blown away by how better a modern chassis is...I'm sort of drawn to AC and secondly to Poo. The goal was an M8000 Alpha. The "enginerd" in me loves the idea of the Alpha skid and the overall robust nature of ACs, while the former racecar driver part of me likes the cutting edge, technical nature of the Polaris mountain sleds. Ski-Don't is all but out at this point - sorry fans. Would a '17 turbo 174 be a game changer or should I stick with my M8 while I learn? What would you do if you were me? Any strong cases for or against?
I spent some time & cash over the summer refurbing my M8 (new DD, new primary & belt, rebuilt secondary, rebuilt Floats, new suspension bushings, etc.) and it's much improved over last season and I do really like the sled as it's been reliable and not at all temperamental, but I want to get into technical tree riding and I just can't seem to get the thing on edge very well...or hold it there. Obviously being new, there is a significant learning curve and we're typically riding with the kid, so I haven't been able to get too far off the trail, but I can't help but wonder if upgrading the sled will pay dividends in shortening the learning curve. Am I at a significant disadvantage with older iron? I was planning to upgrade next season, but an opportunity has presented itself...
The sled I'm looking at is a '17 RMK Pro (Axys) 174 with an aftermarket turbo. It's $8k and has <2k miles on it. It's appealing because the chassis is allegedly miles above the M and I like the idea of being able to have traction at all times, being able to pick my way through the trees and spend more time riding vs digging out. The turbo tempers any worries I had about the track having too much traction when a little spinning is needed and the couple hours I've spent researching so far alleviates any concern over the sled feeling too long compared to my 162. I'm on the fence because it's a significant expense and I don't have a good read on the benefit.
For reference, I'm 6'1", 215lb. Probably 240-250 suited up. I live in central Montana, riding the local mtns on the regular, but 4-5 hrs from West/IP, which is the ultimate goal - hope to go at least once per month after I stop sucking enough to make the trip worth it! Local snow conditions should be similar to West & IP, but less of it.
My goal for next season was to be blown away by how better a modern chassis is...I'm sort of drawn to AC and secondly to Poo. The goal was an M8000 Alpha. The "enginerd" in me loves the idea of the Alpha skid and the overall robust nature of ACs, while the former racecar driver part of me likes the cutting edge, technical nature of the Polaris mountain sleds. Ski-Don't is all but out at this point - sorry fans. Would a '17 turbo 174 be a game changer or should I stick with my M8 while I learn? What would you do if you were me? Any strong cases for or against?