Yep, I expect the AG will be contacting me and pushing it, hoping to hear from others as well so I can add them to the list...I think this was a pretty stupid thing for PI to do, the UCC codes cover this stuff pretty good, and from the reading I have done so far this is pretty major consumer fraud..but who knows..maybe PI has the Aw bought off....Totally....if they don't want it to be a "bumper to bumper warranty," that's fine and the manufacturers are free to provide as much or as little warranty as they wish. Just don't call it that.
The minute you give it a name and call it a "bumper to bumper," or "complete coverage," or "comprehensive," etc etc warranty....all of which indicate that you are covered for any failure (other than wear items, damage, neglect, etc), they are pretty much hosed. Doesn't fly these days. I'm surprised how much sled manufacturers push the limits on that bait/switch advertising crap. Car dealers wouldn't get away with 1/2 that these days....let alone auto manufacturers.
In AK's situation, if things got ugly with the warranty dealings.....I would also start throwing around stuff like "safety concern" and "lucky I wasn't killed." That usually lights the fires (no pun intended).
Last edited: