You sprinkle a few colorful emails on top of all of this that an executive might find offensive in nature (completely subjective in nature). you can see how a high priced attorney and most corperation have several on retainer could make the case. Do i agree with that? not really! Is it possible??? absolutely. Law is not really fair. It really comes down to who tells the better story and high priced attorneys can tell a dam good story if they are paid enough to do so
We have every right in the world to voice our opinion about how Arctic Cat is doing business as an individual customer. However as soon as we mention something in common with what someone else has said we can be lumbed into a group whether or not you wanted to be part of that group.
this is just a single persons point of view in which you may or may not agree with
Thanks for sharing some points. But as a person who did not get to read the post that Christoffer linked to, I am still left with a "if".
I see and concede your point IF Michelle/OTS started this by asking people in some way or another to voice their opinion to AC.
But like I mentioned, this is an outdoor sportshop, not black ops. People are not sworn to secrecy here. If there is a dispute with dealer X and AC that threatened to close the shop, it would be perfectly natural for this situation to appear in the local paper. Then, if people get mad and spew AC with bad feedback, how could the dealer be held accountable??
THIS I don't get UNLESS they did something to spark these actions.
I'm certain many more details will become public in the near future, then I guess I will get some of the blanks filled in and see a better picture.
Until then, cheering for OTS and Michelle.