Yikes. My thoughts and prayers to all involved. This gives me gut rot hearing about this.
I'm the first to scream freedom, personal responsibility, anti-nanny-state, etc. etc. Capital "R", small "L" as Milton Friedman used to say.
BUT: We have guard rails along the switch backs on Chief Joseph highway, and if someone is pulling a 4 place and maybe going a smidge fast, those guard rails come in handy don't they. Was that person "irresponsible" for going a little too fast in the excitement getting to the parking lot? Yes, probably. Are the guard rails impeding on anyones liberty or freedom? Probably not.
NOW: How would an orange sign on the east edge of Cooke City, MT that reads, "DANGER, EXTREME AVALANCE DANGER TODAY, GO BACK AND READ THE AVY REPORT" imped on anyone's freedom? Since cities and counties and states are generally immune to lawsuits, why doesn't Cooke put up a sign? The sign is a success if one person reassesses the danger and decides not to climb Lulu. It won't catch everyone, but it would make me think twice about the slopes. Cooke has a direct concern, they want people to come to Cooke and play and spend money as safely as they can.
I'm not saying this would have helped here and I'm not saying anything bad about anyone. I'm just responding to an earlier post that said something about nanny-state and lawyers.
Eric