Quick, I have a 153 now and I am thinking about a 162 or 174. will this cause me to have belt problems? And will it tone down my sled a little?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you put parallel bar in secondary clutch bring it down to primary make measurment from bar to back side of primary in two places forward of primary and rear of primary front should be 60 to 90 tousands wider in the front
mrquick68, Sorry to chime in late but just got back from Mountains. I have 07 M1000 with 2500 miles. I am on belt number 8. I was bless this trip with the spider on my four tower primary cracking in half in the middle of BFE. I replaced with new three tower. I cannot believe how much better balanced the new clutch is. At WOT it is night and day difference and even noticable at idle. I am mad at myself for not noticing how out of balance the old clutch was but it has been like this since it was new.
I have 400 hundered miles on new clutch. The new clutch does run cooler and belt seems to be in good shape. I have no idea where to send clutches to get balance but I will be doing this on my next sled before the first ride. The belt looks very good comparing it to the last 7 belts with 400 hundred miles on it. The old primary was peeling the cords on the non motor side and if i did not replace belt she would just destroy belt in next hundred or so. After reading your article I am really going to compare the two clutches to see if i can find any difference in offset.
Quickie,, is it possible to shim these drive clutches? sounds like some of the problem is in the fact that the track is spinning while on the stand. NOT being a smart azz, but any time your sled has that much resistance in the drive at idle the belt burning process is taking place. I know the hill climb guys run their belts that tight but at the same time they don't expect long life out of them that's just the nature of the beast... So, with your belt that tight at idle cold, the belt only gets tighter when it gets hot. Don't ask me why but they seem to expand in width and if you are starting with a tight belt in the drive clutch well,,, it will get tighter. Also as the clutches heat they expand hence creating an even tighter squeeze on the belt. Ya, having a looser belt will allow the clutches to disengage coming down hill sooner but at 70+ per belt there has to be some give some where. Seems like the standard gap for a new belt in the drive clutch is like 60 thou. or so. Not sure if that is on both sides or measured from one side.
mrquick68, Sorry to chime in late but just got back from Mountains. I have 07 M1000 with 2500 miles. I am on belt number 8. I was bless this trip with the spider on my four tower primary cracking in half in the middle of BFE. I replaced with new three tower. I cannot believe how much better balanced the new clutch is. At WOT it is night and day difference and even noticable at idle. I am mad at myself for not noticing how out of balance the old clutch was but it has been like this since it was new.
I have 400 hundered miles on new clutch. The new clutch does run cooler and belt seems to be in good shape. I have no idea where to send clutches to get balance but I will be doing this on my next sled before the first ride. The belt looks very good comparing it to the last 7 belts with 400 hundred miles on it. The old primary was peeling the cords on the non motor side and if i did not replace belt she would just destroy belt in next hundred or so. After reading your article I am really going to compare the two clutches to see if i can find any difference in offset.
Quickie,, is it possible to shim these drive clutches? sounds like some of the problem is in the fact that the track is spinning while on the stand. NOT being a smart azz, but any time your sled has that much resistance in the drive at idle the belt burning process is taking place. I know the hill climb guys run their belts that tight but at the same time they don't expect long life out of them that's just the nature of the beast... So, with your belt that tight at idle cold, the belt only gets tighter when it gets hot. Don't ask me why but they seem to expand in width and if you are starting with a tight belt in the drive clutch well,,, it will get tighter. Also as the clutches heat they expand hence creating an even tighter squeeze on the belt. Ya, having a looser belt will allow the clutches to disengage coming down hill sooner but at 70+ per belt there has to be some give some where. Seems like the standard gap for a new belt in the drive clutch is like 60 thou. or so. Not sure if that is on both sides or measured from one side.
Quick,,, do you have other 1000's you can look at? The no shim thing is interesting, I would check the width of the drive clutch in the bottom where the belt rides, just for giggles. I thought drive clutches could be shimmed. Guess I've been away from riding too long.
Ya,, that sucks, I would suspect that the engine is twisting too much. Although I'm still concerned about the lack of gap between the belt and primary. What goes bad after taking the drive clutch apart? Is it the spider? If so, I know it's more money but, can you install an after market spider? I am blown away that these clutches are no better quality than they are. For crying out loud,they haven't changed in 15 years! What a joke! I had cracking problems that long ago but found out part of it was clutch heat so, geared down and cured that problem. You've done that and still have a problem. I would still look at the drive clutch and motor mounts. I think some where in there is the problem.
well, i never got to ride this weekend (no new snow!!!) so i won't know if the softer spring helped until Weds or Thurs as i'm gonna mid week ride this week. will know more then!
i will make more thoughts then as to what i think the issue is.
I run the CPC kits on both my 2007 M1000 and 2007 M8 and having good luck with belts. I also installed the SMT billet spider and billet cover into my 4 tower primary on my M1000. I think the heat and flex kills the belts on the M1000. Also the side cover vents are a must why cat dosent install them as stock I do not know.