Just a few thoughts
Modifying the primary/secondary springs, pin weight and gearing will impose varying changes to the performance of the clutch system and thus the sled. We can debate the value of any of these components and how change will affect any individual component, however the reality is that modifications made to any of these components will affect the complete range of the clutch system. For example, increasing the finish force on the secondary spring might allow for a great balance in the clutch system at one point in time, but this same change may reduce performance at another point in time. The upside is that these modifications are realtively cheap and are easy to make.
The advantage of a custom helix and/or custom set of ramps are that they offer the ability to impose a modification to the clutch system at a specific point in time. For example, a change that is required at a specific track speed can be made without affecting the clutch system balance at other track speeds. The disadvantage of these modifications are the amount of testing, knowledge and experience required and the cost involved with building a custom helix and set of ramps.
Using a straight helix IMHO gives up an opportunity to build a clutch system that is sensitive to changes in the environment at specific points in time.
I think what separates a good clutch system from a great clutch system is the ability of a great clutch system to provide balance in as many situations as possible. IMHO this balance can not be achieved by simply changing the gearing, pin weight, primary or secondary spring.
it's an easy thing to fix , ( if you don't like it , don't do it )