MH -
In the turbo two stroke market, the latest from us is the Dual-PTi setup available for the boosted Arctic Cat's and Polaris's. This new fuel controller perfects the method that fuel is added by automatically compensating for elevation/barometric pressure differences. This means no more messing with buttons as you ride from the truck up into the high country - the PCV does it all for you. Also, for those familiar with PCV software, the fuel table for boost can be all Zeros - and we are already adding the proper theoretical amount of fuel without you having to tune the machine. Fine tuning is still conducted in the same manner by referencing plug color and wash - and then gauges after knowing baselines to obtain the most out of your sled.
This unit is pretty neat and I've loved having one on my Turbo Pro.
The next (and most common) question that I'll respond to regarding turbo fuel controllers is our ability to run secondary injectors on a Polaris:
A: We do have several of these prototypes in the hands of testers who I've been in contact with every week as the snow is beginning to fly. The PCV is perfectly able to handle the fueling of dual injector setups, but the mapping becomes a little convoluted since the sled now has two "imaginary" injectors. At this point, due to the complexity of tuning this version, I will not pull the trigger on releasing this into our production. Instead, a minor firmware fix will simplify the process and provide users with an easy upgrade to their fuel controller for their dual injector fueled Polaris.
We are currently in the process of fitting this into the schedule of our software engineers as we are swamped with a slurry of other projects - an have no estimate on timeframe when this would be available...
Gunner -
For any N/A sled equipped with a stock EGT probe, a close proximity to that location is the most common place I've seen the AFR bung installed. On the Pro (or even the Cat for that matter) I could also see the neckdown area that is unshielded just before the silencer as a potential spot to place the sensor in a vertical orientation (if it will fit under the hood). The airflow past this point should remain quite laminar, albeit at a higher velocity than in the expansion chamber. Both should be capable of producing accurate readings.....I would gladly heed the advice of any other members who have tried these with varying results.
sjohns -
This is a very good question that I'm sure will have some nay-sayers...nonetheless, any OEM machine does have the potential to produce more power than in stock form due to the manufacturers adherence to EPA standards. Whether it is a Dirtbike, a Harley Davidson, or a snowmobile, the tune in the ECU is conservative and very clean to meet standards. When attaching a sled to a dyno, I can say that horsepower increase is nothing to write home about (until we start playing with timing). Instead, the machine becomes more rideable by smoothing out those "safe zones" built in by the OEMs (which makes it feel like it has more ponies).
ZeeeR9 -
The amount of neat capabilities that is available within the Dynojet line of products does become mindblowing sometimes. I am more than happy to clear up misconceptions or provide additional clarification. The ability to explain things in a easy to follow manner is directly attributed to my years as an educator at the collegiate level. Thank you Montana State!
Have a great day everyone - and thanks for keeping this thread going! I enjoy the enthusiasm...
~T.J.