S
SilverGriz
Well-known member
Looks sweet! It is great to see some many performance guys putting R & D into Turbo designs. Keep up the great work!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your design looks like a perfect canidate for an external wastegate.
You mention great price... What is your Target price? This may be a good idea to announce as people are making their decisions now on what to buy for the season.
What feeds the Crank bearings for lubrication?
Where is the turbo oil reservoir tank?
Is there some small reservoir to feed oil to the waterpump/oil pump drive cavity (like on the SkiDoo racers)?
How sturdy is the mounting system for beating the snot out of the sled?
With this design... lower boost (8-10 lb), quick spooling, great boondocking may be possible if you can also focus some of your time/energy into a system for the majority of riders and not just the point-n-shoot people that want to tackle the tunderstruck chutes.
Paying attention to boost thresholds and matching the A/R to the needs of the engine with the exact housings/turbine/compressor needed for this rather than the common off the shelf turbos available.
Also, with the intake... IMO... get rid of the trash-pump perforated suction strainer and run a pickup that mates directly with the hood airbox plenum floor and have plenty of intakes...
Like the Fire N Ice (FNI) headlight intake, side intake and under-windshield intake...
A simple foam gasket with something that will allow easy "close-the-hood" mating of the turbo to the airbox will be a HUGE plus to this system.
No need to put another Trash-Pump "periscope" sticking out the hood like a D!ck-on-a-nun....
The Polaris is already setup for this kind of thing and your turbo location seems to be a perfect match for this type of setup.
The cheeziest, NOT well thought-out thing that I see on most of the turbo kits is this type of outerwears underhood intakes... yes they work... but no, they dont take advantage of the BASIC thermodynamics of compressor operation and detonation minimization.
Keep the Compression ratio as high as possible, with cold air into the turbo so this thing is a boondocking animal. !!!!! Still do a "climbing" package... but dont be tempted to limit yourself to people that only want max power.
FNI stuff that can feed clean, COLD air into your turbo and still make the sled look great! You will have enough cold air into the turbo even on the over the hood days.
product tester
Were not for sure on price yet but should be competitive with any kit on the market.
The motor is premix that feeds the crank bearings.
How are you modifying the cases for this... Polaris had to go to a greased bearing on the race sleds with the same case/crank design for the carbed engines on the 2008/09 IQR's in order to be able to run premix. (they share the 80mm stroke crank with the dragons)
With the wide bearings on cranks... the oil will not get to the crank bearing from the premix.
Short term testing yes... but you will spin a PTO bearing unless some lubrication mods are done to this section of the crank/bearing OR you inject at the bearings again.
It is likely that the PTO bearing is already compromised on this test sled.
The Mag bearing should be OK as this is not a greased bearing on the Racer.
Are you planning on switching out to the greased IQR bearing?
This is from the specs on the 600 Premix race motor.(same crank as the 800 cfi)
– New Crank shaft
• New 132mm Rods
• Double Row Mag Bearing
• Double bearing on PTO side (Greased)
• 31mm vs. 29 mm clutch taper
• Crank Pin 29mm vs. 28mm
– Improved water pump impeller
The turbo oil res is below the turbo. Where is the check/fill plug?
No res for the center bearings. That will HAVE to be done... unless you plan on pumping the oil in prior to each ride like the racers do. The center section of the crank and the oil-pump/water-pump gears are seperated from the remainder of the engine. There are some good small reserviors for this from Polaris and SkiDoo that are smaller than your fist.
Since the 800 CFi shares the same center section, pump drive, bearings and seals as the 08/09 600 Racer with the same crank... this is a good topic for you to get reliabliliy out of your build... it does not run an oil reservoir for the center section.
From Polaris Factory Race Dept.2008 Race Tip # 13 – Center Crankshaft Gear Oiling
To insure adequate lubrication of the center crankshaft gears and bearings we recommend that you lubricate the center
cavity prior to each race weekend.
it is mounted way strong. How does your hoop attach to the bulkhead.
a cold air intake is possible with very little work,and will be an optionbut this is one of the things that drives the price up.
This is also the thing that will make your kit distinguisable from the rest... Also, with the 2010 ECU's having a different flash and much tighter DET sensor thresholds... cold air into the turbo will be much bigger of a deal that you might think on this engine. IMO... this should be a priority on your design for the RMK's.
This Proto TT-D8 draws air from the absolute warmest part of the hood (side mounts draw from the lowest/coolest part of the underhood area) This will greatly affect charge temps, detonation and reed valve life. With a cold air intake, higher boost presures will be useable on lower grade fuels and the characteristics that go along with them before you have to dial back the boost for detonation or the new ECU flash with more sensitive DET thresholds dials back the timing or goes into limp home mode. (The 2010 and 2008/09 upedate flash has just been finalized in the past couple of weeks and did NOT make it to ANY of the 2010 demos)
The inlet temp to the compressor makes a HUGE difference in charge temp.
Some good posts on this here on the forum... Jkinzer has some good data on this comparing inlet temps and charge temps at different boost levels with the garretts.
As for the charge tube...being so short and the turbo so rigidly mounted.... go with a silicone hump-hose to give the needed flex when the motor moves under load.
and as for only climbing chutes I do that maybe 6 or 7 days a year and I rode 120 days last season. What is your primary style of riding, and how active is your riding?
as for choseing the right turbo I would hope we could do that, Me too!
as for the high compresion thats what the turbo is for. Yes... when it is into the effective boost range... But when boondocking, really slowly.. the naturally aspirated characteristics of the engine play more into the performacne of the sled than most would think on a turbo RMK... I am talking about static compression and not going with a cut dome. There is a VERY noticeable difference in the boondoking abilities in the lower compression (read: cut domes) turbo dragons than the stock compression ratio turbo sleds out there... and that is with the same charge tract. This is from experience on this D-8's
gus bohne
Lots of good ideas and thoughts. From you as well!!
compression ratio is less of an issue than it was years ago. So are you saying you are not going with a lower static compression ratio than the stock motor has?
What is different than 2 years ago on the polaris or with turbos?
bmep curves are much broader than just 2 years back. Again, what happened 2 years ago to change this on the RMK's?
chamber shape design is a bigger player in transition than compression. Can you elaborate on this?
todays turbo 2 strokes have better response than their stock counterparts, some due to the better oem baseline, other gains came from experience in the field and learning the tuning methods of the turbo and what it likes and dislikes.
In tight boondocking situations, I dont see your point, BUT... I am open to learning something... How does a "todays turbo" sled, boondock and have better throttle response throughout the rpm range over it's N.A. version prior to boost?
Gus
Lots of questions Ill try to awnser them all first off I am Shain Stanger I own Twisted Turbos.Again.. these are sincere questions and I hope that you can take the time to answer them and help us out with some info and cast light on the topic.
OK... First off... Who is who on this post.... Product Tester, 700RMKBOY, SnowStar, Gus ??? And how are you connected to TT?
Since I'm stuck on the computer this weekend with work... might as well ask some more questions.
Lyle... Skinz Protective Gear makes knee pads for the Dragons.
Lots of questions Ill try to awnser them all first off I am Shain Stanger I own Twisted Turbos.
I have found the longer the charge tube the more velocity it takes to make boost, velocity creates heat. no charge tube=no heat.
product tester : ...my 50mm bov thats on the air box and is wide open at idle.
Another thing that is food for thought...
Like on the Cats... using supplimental injectors before the throttle body plates would act to cool the inlet charge. Vaporization/expansion of an atomized stream of petrol would cool the charge. Much like the expansion of coolant in an HVAC system... or a swamp cooler.
The trick would be to manage a another set of injectors.
Many different ways to "bake a cake"... This is a great topic!!
Another thing that is food for thought...
Like on the Cats... using supplimental injectors before the throttle body plates would act to cool the inlet charge. Vaporization/expansion of an atomized stream of petrol would cool the charge. Much like the expansion of coolant in an HVAC system... or a swamp cooler.
The trick would be to manage a another set of injectors.
Many different ways to "bake a cake"... This is a great topic!!