Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your 2012 800 made 132 ?? What altitude are you guys at ?
Its the old HP game again. Boys its a reference / comparison tool. Each Dyno will read differently, sorry thats just how it usually is. DTR has one set, SLP has another, BMP another. You use them as a reference tool like they did if you read the post.
They dynoed two machines same day same weather and it shows the difference. The other sled they dyno is no where near what the HP claims are for that sled also. If you ran a Pro 600 on that dyno it is going to be about 25-30 HP less than what the 800 dynoed at.
The best way to use one is like they did and compare different machine same day what are the differences. or same machine on same dyno same day same settings just change pipes or heads or whatever and compare and you can see what makes a difference and by how much.
Elevation?
No doubt a dyno is a tuning tool but those are very low numbers,thats a sick motor. DTR is like 600 feet and even the beat D8's he did were 138-140. The new six isn't 30 less. I've spoken to two dealers that put it at 130 and theres a thread on hcs saying bikeman ran it at 132 ? Who knows...
again not getting it same dyno same day different sleds will show the difference.
I know Eric from BMP. His dyno did not dyno a 6 at 132 stock. pipe and head yes, stock no.
My brothers uncles cousin said...
Its a tuning/calibrating device.
pro 6,s and 8,s on same dyno same day have been about 25 hp difference. Its true the Polaris 8 is down about 10 HP from other brands, but it performs better on snow and thats all that matters!!!
hmm..we can roll 125 miles a day of total powder riding...all above treeline in some nasty country..most all of it pinned..my poo has done as good or better then all the other brands..day after day........and as far as reliability..does that include the whole drivetrain/sled or just the motor in your world? seems to me if the poo was that unreliable..you would have page after page of threads on owners complaining..rather then the threads we have with mostly other brand riders whining........--When cylinder skirts break, it's performance is a big fat zero.
--The Pro motor appears to not even be making factory rated HP, let alone engine reliability that other brand engines achieve.
--In the deep powder West, a lot of riders run their engines at max rated HP and RPM for somewhat extended periods due to terrain and deep snow. HP and reliability really count.
--In the flats of the Midwest, WOT is rarely held open for very long
--
--The Pro motor appears to not even be making factory rated HP
--When cylinder skirts break, it's performance is a big fat zero.
--The Pro motor appears to not even be making factory rated HP, let alone engine reliability that other brand engines achieve.
--In the deep powder West, a lot of riders run their engines at max rated HP and RPM for somewhat extended periods due to terrain and deep snow. HP and reliability really count.
--In the flats of the Midwest, WOT is rarely held open for very long
I think he rides a PC..but not sure........LOL. What color XM do you ride ???
I think he rides a PC..but not sure........
hmm..we can roll 125 miles a day of total powder riding...all above treeline in some nasty country..most all of it pinned..my poo has done as good or better then all the other brands..day after day........and as far as reliability..does that include the whole drivetrain/sled or just the motor in your world? seems to me if the poo was that unreliable..you would have page after page of threads on owners complaining..rather then the threads we have with mostly other brand riders whining........