That's is some seriously shady statistics. 1 sled could belong to the bearing and the oil line failure (we have people on the forum who have had all 3 on the same sled). That does not equal 5% overall failure. Its tempting to just add them up, but statistically you cannot do that and be accurate at all.
10k sleds, 1% failure is 100 sleds. Group A
10k sleds 2% failure is 200 sleds. Group B. It is entirely possible that all 100 sleds from group A are in Group B, or 0 from group A. Thus the maximum failure is 3% and the minimum is 2%.
10k sleds 2% failure is 200 sleds. Group C. It is entirely possible that all 200 sleds from group B are in group c, or 0 from group B. Thus the maximum failure is 5% and the minimum is 2%.
I would bet the overall failure is probably somewhere around 2.75%. Since everyone I know who has bearing failure ended up with oil line failure later as well. Those sleds don't count as 2 or 3 different sleds that failed, they were 1 sled that failed in multiple groups. That doesn't seem egregious when knowing just how failure prone 2 strokes are in general. (if you have owned 10 new 2 stroke sleds in your life, chances are you have seen a motor failure)
Further, if your cat or doo failed, did they give you $500 parts credit and an extra year of warranty while getting you back on the snow within 2 weeks? Kudos to Polaris for stepping up putting out numbers and backing their customers.
My post earlier was just to be snarky and stir the pot but sarcasm aside, the red sentence has been my observation as well and thus could skew number greatly.
IN response to those holding the SW poll seriously, the amount of people I know with 850's and that aren't on SW is staggering. Everyone single one of them is out riding with zero issues. They aren't on here looking for answers to problems they don't have and thus cannot vote that their sled is running well.
I think that would be the nature of any poll on a forum though. My .02Cents.