Obama's birth cert. issue not going away

[thomps33]

This thread has gone down the crapper....just a bunch of women bickering back and forth now.

 

[Ollie]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ollie
I wouldn't even bother replying to that tard anymore.
I think "it" must be 12 (or a liberal arts college student).
Flaky has no clue what a debate is or how to go about it.
We have lots of debates and welcome anyone with constructive input (even if we don't agree with Ruffy).
The libs just arn't used to people disagreeing with them. That's why this type of thread is so foreign to it. There are both sides of the arguement represented and we debate the merrits. So I am sure "it" is confused and scared by people that think other than the way "it" wants.
All "it" does is the same bs that all libs do. Blame, deflect and name call.
Not worth the effort.

If this thread is a debate then you Obama hater guys lost it. In case you haven't noticed, your claim of a birth certificate issue has gone away. It has turned into a lets see if we can intimidate Snow Flake thread.

Yep, the brain dead blind bo lovers stepped in and hi-jacked the thread with stupid chit and ruined it.
How very liberal of you.

 

[MPS]

This thread has gone down the crapper....just a bunch of women bickering back and forth now.

hehe ok my bad


.

 

[ski-doo junkie]

no doubt!

when liberals loose an attempt to deceive you (every time) it's about a 5 step process they go through:
1) Change the subject
2) Bush did "this other thing similar in my tiny liberal mind"
3) You did something...
4) You're a hater...
5) You're racist...

Every step really points to liberal failings. Liberals are the racist, hate-filled people that do terrible things in the name of helping.


.[/QUOTE


You hit it right on

 

[MPS]

no doubt!

when liberals loose an attempt to deceive you (every time) it's about a 5 step process they go through:
1) Change the subject
2) Bush did "this other thing similar in my tiny liberal mind"
3) You did something...
4) You're a hater...
5) You're racist...

Every step really points to liberal failings. Liberals are the racist, hate-filled people that do terrible things in the name of helping.


.[/QUOTE


You hit it right on

anti-libby group hug!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAH!

 

[blue fluff]

Shorter version of post 413. The link has the images of the emails from the nationally known talk show host discussing the threats. I cut out paragraphs so it's easier and faster to get the gist.

Here's what the Northeast Intelligence Network has uncovered after 8 months of investigation. Interesting given the Chicago style tactics with Inspector Generals and others and planting questions in press conferences that even Helen Thomas objected to. It looks like there were threats from the White House back last year about News people and specifically one nationally known talk show host talking about the BC.

"Media Blackout on Obama eligibility dates back to November

Although we do not have the birth certificate or proof of ineligibility, the Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press have documentation of a cover-up relating to the issue of Obama’s eligibility to hold office. The proof we possess not only exposes a well orchestrated cover-up, but also provides critical insight into why the topic of Obama’s eligibility has failed to gain traction in the corporate media.


The Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press are in possession of extremely sensitive investigative documents, including a stunning written admission by a nationally known talk show host stating that he was threatened with his career – or worse - should he talk about the issue of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth records to a national audience. This document was obtained on December 10, 2008, and provides explicit detail of a “gag order” imposed on this host before and immediately following the national election last November.

After receiving and authenticating the document, US based veteran private investigator Douglas J. Hagmann opened a full scale investigation into the media blackout, with specific emphasis on tracing the blackout origins to those issuing them...it was decided to keep the existence of the document secret until additional evidence could be obtained.

Summary of the Evidence

As noted above, we are in possession of a written account by a well known national talk show host who details how he was prohibited to discuss the controversy of Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility as president of the United States. This signed document cites exact dates and times when he was forbidden to discuss any aspect of the birth certificate controversy, and includes direct references to the individuals responsible for such prohibitions. Further, his statement identifies the individuals who originated the orders and their positions, and confirms that failure to adhere to the order would likely end his career in that industry. He also confirms that other, less specific but more menacing threats were implied during conversations with those making the subject off limits.

From multiple interviews conducted within the last eight months, we have obtained information from other sources, independent of the above, who have also been instructed to avoid any discussion of the birth certificate issue at all costs, to wit:

The account of an administrative assistant employed in New York City by a cable network news station who provided significant, detailed information of a 2008 meeting between the top network executive and four-(4) well-known news anchors. This source confirmed that she drafted the memo to the various hosts to notify them of the date, time and location of this high-level meeting at the request of the network’s top executive.

Present at this meeting, she verified that the network official issued “warnings” to the personalities “to avoid any on-air discussion of the birth place, eligibility, and news accounts of litigation compelling [Barack Hussein] Obama to produce a legitimate copy of his birth certificate.” She stated that the network executive had her arrange the conference immediately following a meeting “between [the network executive] and an attorney closely associated with candidate Obama who was acting on his behalf.”

The statement of a corporate secretary for a major news network confirming the existence of a one-page inter-office memo, bearing the markings “confidential” and “not for dissemination,” addressed and distributed to news anchors and on-air talent” that specifically instructed the recipients to avoid any discussion pertaining to the Obama birth certificate controversy. The memo was written and distributed in October 2008, and specifically instructed on-air talent to “advise guests, as necessary, to refrain from citing any news story, legal proceedings, Internet ‘blogs’ or other sources that pertain to the ongoing eligibility controversy of future President Barack Obama.”

As outlined above, our Investigation has uncovered both direct and indirect evidence of threats being made against some of the nation’s top radio and television personalities, which would explain some giving this topic mere lip service. As one source interviewed during the course of this investigation stated, “I’ve got a career and family to think about.”


http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373

 

[Snow Flake]

no doubt!

when liberals loose an attempt to deceive you (every time) it's about a 5 step process they go through:
1) Change the subject
2) Bush did "this other thing similar in my tiny liberal mind"
3) You did something...
4) You're a hater...
5) You're racist...

Every step really points to liberal failings. Liberals are the racist, hate-filled people that do terrible things in the name of helping.


.

Interesting you hold up the right wing lunatic fringe tactics as those of mine. Especially #2. Just look at all you master debaters that keep warning me not to bring up Bush. Your last sentence describes yourselves to a T.

You guys certainly are willing to work yourselves into a frenzy at the drop of a hat. You're doing a good job or destroying any creditability the Republican party has left.

 

[swampwater]

Yea sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words, especially when you are expressing your feelings to a liberal with brains full of mush. Swampy

Yep, the brain dead blind bo lovers stepped in and hi-jacked the thread with stupid chit and ruined it.
How very liberal of you.

 

[ruffryder]

Yea sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words, especially when you are expressing your feelings to a liberal with brains full of mush. Swampy

Ollie, Is this the respect you were talking about?

 

[MPS]

Ollie, Is this the respect you were talking about?

Booo hooo

Go to your touchy feely libby group and get your respect Rodney Dangerfield. LMAO.


.

 

[tudizzle]

this about sums it up


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teMlv3ripSM

 

[ruffryder]

Booo hooo

Go to your touchy feely libby group and get your respect Rodney Dangerfield. LMAO.


.

Good to Go? Is that you?

 

[swampwater]

Ollie, Is this the respect you were talking about?

Sorry Ruffy I didn't mean to hurt your feelings, would you rather I use brain dead? At least a brain full of mush can be molded to understand reason, logic and common sense. You need to quit taking these posts so seriously it wasn't,meant to be personel to you! Swampy

 

[Ollie]

Ollie, Is this the respect you were talking about?

Just consider the source.
This thread was started to track and discuss the issue.
And of cource a few libs come in and start name calling and trashing everyone and of cource hijack the thread. Typical liberal attack method, straight out of the bo attack manual.

I haven't seen one construtive post by flaky, swampwater or yourself.
So if you don't have anything to add, go away.
If you have anything to add that is constructive, then do so.

I already put flaky on the ignore list and you of all people should know that I don't do that often or without cause.

 

[Ollie]

misunderstood a post.
My fault.
My appoligise to Swampwater.

 

[Trinity Taz]

Everyone, just relax and take a moment aside from all this seriousness.

Now picture the rear aspect view of the two humped over, sweating, tic-tic, ticking forms of Flakey and Ruffy (whose forum names kinda sound like cheap breakfast cereals to me) in front of their computers trying their damnedest to type a barely understandable answer to the conservatives on this post in yet another failed attempt to defend their futile liberal views with facts they didn't hear from BHOle

Now do yourselves a favor and don't picture the side view, 'cause they're probably not typing with their busy little, sweaty hands and their computers probably have a picture of Nancy Pelosi in a skimpy outfit on the screen.

OH Gak, now I wish I hadn't pictured it :0

"Ruffy and Flakey, always good for a laugh!...J-Fly needs professional help"

 

[defysgravity]

I don't think they voted so much for the obamanation as they voted against their other option.
McCain and the republican party.
Bush and the republicans totally screwed up the first 2 years of the war in Iraq. They pretty much miscalculated everything they possibly could. They passed new laws restricting peoples rights, they ran up huge deficits and then the economy crashed on Bush's watch.
The media and the dems did a great job of showing that McCain would just be 4 more years of Bush.

Enter the obamanation. Extremely well spoken, very carasmatic and said all the right things. He portrayed himself as a centrist that could bring the 2 sides together. He used all the proper buzz words (health care reform, climate change, sticking it to the rich, etc), now he used the buzz words without actually saying how he was going to do any of it. Then there is the race card. just as there were those that voted against him just because of the color of his skin, there were even more that voted for him just because of the color of his skin. Those that wanted to show they weren't racist and those that were racist and just wanted a black man in the white house. There were a lot of illigal or at least VERY unethical things he did to get there, but he got there.

Now a lot of those people that voted for him, are questioning their decision and regretting it.

Ollie.....I agree with you one hundred percent.....

 

[Ollie]

I think you must be in denial Ollie, have you read any of my posts, I think you need to look at all my posts before you speek out. Please show me one post I have ever put on this forum you would consider liberal. And I don't call you azzhat so try and keep the conversation civil. I have been fighting the liberal/marxist factions in this country for over forty years and I can guarantee you I have forgotten more on the battle than you have learned. I could go on but I think you have simply misread a post that has colored your post and need to rethink it. DO NOT EVER REFER TO ME AS A LIBERAL. I have worked tirelessly for to long to try and force the government to resprect and follow the constitution to resemble that charge. Swampy

PM sent

 

[MTm7]

Reason and common sence??
Show me your #$%^ common sence.
You come in here and start chit without knowing a %$%^& thing.
You make accusations about chit you know nothing about.
You don't like, step the $%^& off.
I don't need some limp $%&* liberal *** trying to be funny.
This was a post about our constitution and what the issues are.
You might think this **** is funny.
What have you EVER done in your life to defend this country or the constitution??

Speak up azzhat.

whoa ollie i think you must be mistaken... swampy's not that ^^^ guy at all! he's a conservative brother for sure!

 

[thomps33]

whoa ollie i think you must be mistaken... swampy's not that ^^^ guy at all! he's a conservative brother for sure!

yeah, I think there was a little misunderstanding...hopefully they kiss and make up