Your thoughts?
The intentions of spending more resources on the least gifted students may be well & good,
however, our future does not rest in the hands of the least gifted students.
While we are producing "smarter morons", it is at the expense of our future leaders.
Our brightest students will have to compete on a global market with the best educated people from all corners of the Earth.
These students are starving to learn more, but are being held back by the weaker links in the chain.
Our high school classrooms are teaching at a speed dictated by the slowest learners. Some would like to be smarter, but simply do not have the tools, while others just do not care. They are not putting forth an earnest effort, but are governing the rate at which others around them can learn.
Our brightests lights are not being given the opportunity to shine to their potential.
"No child left behind" is a huge failure, but no one comes out against it for fear of being labeled as against education.
The intentions of spending more resources on the least gifted students may be well & good,
however, our future does not rest in the hands of the least gifted students.
While we are producing "smarter morons", it is at the expense of our future leaders.
Our brightest students will have to compete on a global market with the best educated people from all corners of the Earth.
These students are starving to learn more, but are being held back by the weaker links in the chain.
Our high school classrooms are teaching at a speed dictated by the slowest learners. Some would like to be smarter, but simply do not have the tools, while others just do not care. They are not putting forth an earnest effort, but are governing the rate at which others around them can learn.
Our brightests lights are not being given the opportunity to shine to their potential.
"No child left behind" is a huge failure, but no one comes out against it for fear of being labeled as against education.