Good Easy Read on Global Warming, UN Lies

[Wade]

Thought this was the best thought out document, on the Global Warming BS.

http://www.ldolphin.org/sensitivity.pdf

 

[Ollie]

""These buoys have shown no oceanic warming in the five years since they were deployed, contrary to model predictions that pronounced warming would occur. This result is highly significant, because it is the oceans, far more than the atmosphere, that are the real bell-wether of climatic change. The oceans, some 11oo times denser than the atmosphere, would be expected to take up at least 80% of the excess heat generated by anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions: yet, despite continuing rapid increases in emissions, the oceans are not warming at all, and may even be cooling a little""

That right there tells valumes about the bs that has been pushed on us so gore and his type could force us to spend billions on climate bills that do nothing.

 

[Ollie]

That is a LONG and VERY well written article that explains it all pretty good.
Also points out that the whole global warming bs is just that.
BS.
Nice find.

 

[Wade]

Regardless of the effect we are having, this is the kind of statement that has always made me question this entire carbon credit scam.

The central difficulty is illustrated by perhaps the most startling statistic in the paper: that even if we were to shut down the entire global economy and fling humankind back into the Stone Age, without even the right to light fires in our caves, “global warming” prevented would amount to 0.0035-0.035 K/year (0.006-o.06 F/year).

That's nothing, in the face of their 0.1 degree increases a year. Basically, you can't do anything to stop it, no matter how hard you try, and you don't even know if it will be a bad thing.

 

[Ollie]

That's nothing, in the face of their 0.1 degree increases a year. Basically, you can't do anything to stop it, no matter how hard you try, and you don't even know if it will be a bad thing.

Your problem is you have no faith.
Just let bo handle it, he has all the answers.
Didn't you see the idea about the big ships that would take in sea water and vaporize it to create clouds to block the suns rays?

Wow, that is even too much sarcasm for me.

 

[Wolfrun]

I know it is a simplicity but I still think let ma nature alone and she will take care of herself.

 

[Wade]

Your problem is you have no faith.
Just let bo handle it, he has all the answers.
Didn't you see the idea about the big ships that would take in sea water and vaporize it to create clouds to block the suns rays?

Wow, that is even too much sarcasm for me.

Give BO some credit, he's not letting this global catastrophe go to waste.

I got an idea, why don't they take all the money their wasting on UN political BS studies, and dump it into fusion research. No greenhouse gases, no pollution, no real radioactive waste. That's how we save the world. Al Gore would be heart broken.

 

[Ollie]

Give BO some credit, he's not letting this global catastrophe go to waste.

I got an idea, why don't they take all the money their wasting on UN political BS studies, and dump it into fusion research. No greenhouse gases, no pollution, no real radioactive waste. That's how we save the world. Al Gore would be heart broken.

I have been asking the eggheads here where I work by they arn't doing fusion research and was told they are doing some. The problem is no-one will fund it. It is a pure research field and no-one wants to dump that kind of money into something that may not pay off for years.

They will do hydrogen research, but not research into real answers.

Besides, they can't come up with their outragious ideas and new ways to waste money if they actually solved the problem.

 

[Wolfrun]

Over the last 35 five years tremendous breakthroughs have been made in nuclear fusion but always have been bought out some how. My oldest brother was engineer in charge of GE's big electrical power plant parts plant. He told me in 76 that fusion was operational but only on a huge scale but they still had to miniturize it. That is the wave of the future but there has been a lot of politics played with it over the years. As I say my brother told me about this in 76 and ten years ago my wife's cousin, an ex Colorado State Engineer told me the exact same story of fusion being developed in the seventies but that someone was sitting on it. My brother and the state engineer never heard of each other. Interesting.

 

[thomps33]

Over the last 35 five years tremendous breakthroughs have been made in nuclear fusion but always have been bought out some how. My oldest brother was engineer in charge of GE's big electrical power plant parts plant. He told me in 76 that fusion was operational but only on a huge scale but they still had to miniturize it. That is the wave of the future but there has been a lot of politics played with it over the years. As I say my brother told me about this in 76 and ten years ago my wife's cousin, an ex Colorado State Engineer told me the exact same story of fusion being developed in the seventies but that someone was sitting on it. My brother and the state engineer never heard of each other. Interesting.

Fusion is the wave of the future. However, the sustained break even point in fusion has not been reached yet (on any scale). I believe the only positive net gain from fusion reaction at the moment is from hydrogen bombs, but that's obviously not sustained. Right now there is a HUGE fusion reactor being built in France with funding from many countries. Only time will tell if it's sucessfull.