Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

D U I......your opinions

I don't know how things are in USA but up here knowing many of the local police officers, they'd much rather give you a 24hr suspension then a DUI. The paperwork, time, and effort needed to fully prosecute someone in ridiculous and makes the laws almost pointless.

I've heard many stories from them, how they'd much rather give you the suspension to ensure that they can keep everyone safe tonight and not be tied up back at the station.

Anyone that suggests raising the limit needs to do more research in my opinion. I'd fully endorse 0.00% blood alcohol level. If you want to have fun, then plan accordingly. I'm not saying I was perfect growing up but over time you learn that having a good couple hours one night isn't nearly worth the possibility of injuring or killing someone else.

We live in the land of the free and myself and family are entitled to drive our roads and walk our sidewalks without the fear that someone without the proper state of mind and mental ability would be behind the wheel and could possibly endanger them.
 
Drunk driving? I'm all for it. Alcoholics pay my salary. :)

I think the limit's fine where it is in CO. Even if you don't blow a ≥.080, they can still hit you with DWAI among others, so you're screwed either way.

Penalties should be harsher; especially for multiple offenses.
 
Well, I can bet that those of you saying that .08 BAC is way too low have not lost a family member to an intoxicated driver. Validation studies have been done that conclude at .08 a person is too intoxicated to drive safely. You can't imagine how stupid people get at even .05, let alone .08, or .28. Alcohol is great and fun and everything else, but not good when mixed with driving. I worked an alcohol related fatal crash just last week. Not fun! People think that, "oh, that won't happen to me, I will make it just fine." The grave yards are full of people that felt that they were just fine. Drink all you want, just dont' get behind the wheel.
 
Many of you vow that you would kill someone if they killed a loved one while D&D.

I totally understand that emotion.

But how about someone texting who runs a red light & kills a loved one?
Will you kill them? Why? or Why not?

What if someone has only had a few, but is legally too drunk to drive, let's say your kid runs out into the street after a ball, is struck & killed?
We all know it was actually the kids fault, but since the guy was drunk he
will be charged with vehicular manslaughter.

My point is that there are infinite scenarios with fault ranging from none to full.
Yet DUI is painted with a single brush.

Anyone of us could kill another innocent motorist at most any time from some
very unfortunate set of circumstances, with our own neglegence being a
contributing factor.

To predetermine fault & guilt simply because of BAC may seem noble, but is
ignorant & short sighted when other factors are not taken into consideration.


I certainly do not advocate D&D, but I will not condem anyone for it without
knowing the whole story.
 
There's a difference between the scenarios you presented.

In the kid scenario if the driver wasn't drunk he could have(hypothetical i know) had enough time to stop after seeing your kid run out. But due to alcohol consumption his reaction time was hindered.

I think there's a difference between the texting scenario. When you get behind a wheel drunk before hand and while driving you know that your senses are hindered and you are impaired. Texting is a temporary impairment. Both can cause fatal accidents and texting is becoming illegal in some provinces up here.

It's just one of those things you know you shouldn't do. I forsee in the future texting or any negligence will be treated the same in the courts. Texting is still new and hasn't had the time to be be recognized as impairing your driving your skills like alcohol has.

I'd never kill someone for an accident. I don't think any follower of Christ or believer in God would. That being said I think hit and runs are different scenarios and even though I know it would be wrong I'd have to fight myself to not do something silly.
 
I read a reply to my post about living in a "small town" of 2000 people....that's huge compared to my town. We have a couple bars in a town of 600. People know that driving drunk is bad, but I'm sure a few still do it. But from what I see, or have seen lately, there are a lot more DD's than before. The sheriff's have been really cracking down so people are getting smarter.

I've never known law enforcement to drive business away from a bar before, up here, people just start following the rules.
 
You use the kid running into the street scenario. Sure the kid should not have done this but it's a child. The driver is more than likely an adult or close to it and knows the law. Also who's to say that if the driver was sober his reflexes would have been much better and he could have avoided hitting the kid.

You see, anything can be twisted anyway someone wants to. Bottom line it is illegal. There is a clear line defining legally drunk. If you cross that line then you damn well better be prepared to faces the consequences. Afterall it was your choice. Noone forced you to do it.
 
Johnny, my point was that it is indeed stupid to D&D.
But there are many other stupid things we all do while driving that have the
potential to be just as tragic.
But stupid seems to be socially more acceptable than inebriated.
Why is that?
 
If drinking and driving is illegal then there should be no limit. Sober?-Drive. Not sober?-get a ride, call a cab, sleep in your car but don't drive.

Now I already hear you saying "Dartos you ignorant bastard, that just not practical. I had 2 glasses of wine with my wife at dinner last night at the Olive Garden. Then a night cap before we left. I know my B.A.C was around .04 and I felt fine, no problems driving and not above the legal limit. Now go crawl back under your rock you intolerant ****."

So you feel fine with .04? Then the next time you get ready to take your wife and kids to see Mickey and Goofey you would have no problem with your chosen airline pilot knocking back a couple prior to take off? Maybe even come into the cabin and having a shot with you?
 
If drinking and driving is illegal then there should be no limit. Sober?-Drive. Not sober?-get a ride, call a cab, sleep in your car but don't drive.

Now I already hear you saying "Dartos you ignorant bastard, that just not practical. I had 2 glasses of wine with my wife at dinner last night at the Olive Garden. Then a night cap before we left. I know my B.A.C was around .04 and I felt fine, no problems driving and not above the legal limit. Now go crawl back under your rock you intolerant ****."

So you feel fine with .04? Then the next time you get ready to take your wife and kids to see Mickey and Goofey you would have no problem with your chosen airline pilot knocking back a couple prior to take off? Maybe even come into the cabin and having a shot with you?

I agree 100%.

I think we need some sane dui laws though. I have two dui's on my record, what kills me is both times I was not even driving. One was on a skateboard, the other I was in the back seat of my truck sleeping. The keys were in my pocket so I was found guilty of "intent to drive", 20 days in jail, ankle monitor, all that jazz.

With penalties like that I almost wish I had driven. For that I would bet I would of not got caught.

Live and learn, I no longer drink, just smoke the mj.
 
Too bad I caught this thread so late in the game, so bear with the multi-quotes.

Here's a good contoversial topic for a nice Sunday debate.

What's your states BAC limit? (.08 in SD)
Is that limit appropriate?
Are penalties appropriate?

I don't know the proper BAC limit, a lot of it is political pandering to groups like MADD..used to be higher. I don't disagree with the limits, my wife with one drink gets stupid giggly and says she's drunk and hangs off me..I can drink a six pack and be ok. Unfortunatly you gotta make a mass effect rule and put it somewhere. Can't exactly tell "Joe" he's goot for .15 while "Sam" can only have .05 eh?

Co is .08 too low!
penalties are to high.
the reason they lowered it is because federal government made them do it or they would have lost highway funding.

If they REALLY wanted to end drinking and driving all they need to do is have every one install a mandated interlock system on their vehicles (breathalizer) BUT that will NEVER happen because why?:confused:

wait for it.....................






REVENUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!:beer;:beer;:beer;:beer;

They depend on that money, state, county and local law enforcement need the money!

Bullchit on the revenue, sure some cops are badge heavy and some depts push for quotas as a way of collecting stats. It's also to keep cops pushing for them and not letting them off easy, cause its easy.. Some cops may have had a close to home tradegy and have NO tolerence. Perhaps the next cop is a drinker himself and "understands" eh?

I've voiced my opinion about it being all about revenue before & got a lot of angry comments for it, but it's a fact.
& since I quit drinking, I don't have to worry about it anymore.

good on ya! :beer; for staying on the wagon:D

I agree to a point.

My gripe is that it is not a black & white issue. TRUE DAT
There are infinite levels of sobriety (or drunkeness).
The guy who had 2-3 beers is on a whole different level than the guy who drives
home because he's too drunk to walk.
Yet the law treats it as black & white, or drunk & sober. How could you do it anyother way? (without individule testing at massive $$$)

Many of you have no idea what small town America really is either. A LOT of us are small town, hence the Obama support eh?
Like it or not, if you want to socialize in a community of less than 2000 people,
you go to the bar. That's really about the size of it.
Of course communities of this size have no taxi service, so drinking & driving
happens.....all of the time.
For the most part, the local law enforcement (city cops) respect this reality,
and only pull you over if you're breaking a traffic law.
But the state highway patrol use the bars as easy picking to meet their quotas.
It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
They have no respect for the fact that these businesses are members of our
economic community & vital employers as well.

Every time our area gets a new (read:young) state trooper, the bars revenues
drop until the fella get's the big picture & backs off a bit.

Ok, so you just discribed my small town...still I have a story..It involves a drunk guy from the local bar, a woman and her three girls...It ended badly for the mother and all 3 girls. Wanna hear the grizzly details? I won't tell em, it messed up a friend of mine so bad he quit being a cop couldn't get the image of the little girl under the car out of his head.

I will tell you my opinion. Yes East you have a point...I don't know about the revenue thing....that is too much conspiracy theory I think. Ya! But, I do know many cops that circle the bars to try to get DUI arrests. That bugs me. I have told them I have a problem with that. Most of them are gunning for something...most arrests for the month...promotions, whatever. I hear the revenue thing all the time....cops aren't driven by that, at least the ones I know. Well I do know many state troopers in various states do have to meet quotas.....so there may be some truth to the revenue thing.

Who knows what the appropiate intoxication level should be. Everyone's tolerance level is different. I have dealt with people that were .30 and over that were completely functional. If you can't pass the field sobriety test then you are too messed up to drive.

Like I said I have a problem with the cops fishing for DUI arrests....but on the other side I have a real problem with douches hurting people with a lethal weapon (a vehicle). I have seen too many deaths caused by it. I was almost hit one night when I was making an arrest in a parking lot. I had to push the guy I was arresting out of the way and I had to jump.....the drunk POS then hit a dumpster totaling his car. He was bleeding and crying.

The problem with DUI's is it is always going to be very subjective. I can agree to not hammer the first offense when some person makes a mistake. When it happens again and again....the hammer should come out!
MPS has it down, and its a small wonder considering his exposure eh?

OMHO on this subject? There is no fair way to do it, I don't like to hear about the dude in the back of the truck sleeping it off or getting a DUI on a lawnmower or skateboard that is BULLCHIT I say.
I'm not against the .08 limit, but there needs to be some compassion and ****in COMMEN SCENCE in the enforcing of laws. Unfortunatly there is none, and if you do have commen scence your never going to get high enough up the chain to make a bit of difference. Too much is officer discresion, but then you give em discression and they fug you with it.

I can't see a meaninful change come of any of this, moral of the story is don't ****in drink and drive! (or pass out on the side of the road with keys in pocket)
 
Last edited:
im in a small mountain town. cops around here would rather give you a ride home than deal with the paperwork, but if they pull u over the will arrest you.

ive asked many a cops this and have gotten verry different reactions....

you can get a DUI for operating a car right?
you can get a DUI for ridding a bike right?

how about a horse, can you get a DUI for ridding a horse? the horse isnt going to run into a wall.:D
 
If drinking and driving is illegal then there should be no limit. Sober?-Drive. Not sober?-get a ride, call a cab, sleep in your car but don't drive. -at least in MN that is my only cripe with DUIs, that yo ucan get them for sleeping in the car, etc.


Nw from my perspective. 0.08 is just fine....we do need a static number. Yeah you can be fine at .2 if your a pro drunk, or my wife could have 2 and be done for the night....we can't leave this up to judgement.

IF that were the case, I still think my DUI was not me drunk driving....yeah I blew .16. BUT I KNOW I had driven many times at a much higher level...just happened to be my night to get hit and I took my lumps cause I knew I deserved it.

Ya know what I did then, I spent the next 4-6 hours thinking about what could have happened and thanking God nothing did happen. Then I went home and poured out 200 bucks of liquor and 300 of beer(just to see if I could go without drinking). When I went to work I had a guy harping my ace all day about how I could have killed his kid, etc. Pissed me right the F off, I told him to shut the F up, that I realized that and I was glad it didn't happen and to just shut up. To me that is the worst part, when people harp on ya like that when you know what could have happened(well if your normal). Hope that made sense.

Now course looking back I think I must have been to drunk to drive cause I dropped a chick off at her house and told her I didn't wanna come in with her.....cause my dumb ace wanted to go back to the bar:mad: Freaking moron, I deserved a DUI just for that!
 
I'm far from perfect when it comes to boozin and driving.

With that said, the penalties need to be stiffer. That's the only way to curb drinking and driving. 10-30 days in jail will make me call a cab.
 
My mom got a DUI a couple years back. She was rear ended in a turn lane waiting on the light to turn. She blew over the legal limit of .08... the guy that hit her blew under .08 (not .00)... The guy that hit her didnt' get charged with ANYTHING and she got the DUI.... She wasn't even moving at the time... oh and since she was charged with the fault... her ins. had to pay...

Course we do live in a friggin state that just legalized gay marriage... maybe the guy blew something else for the cop other than the breathalizer...
 
Premium Features



Back
Top