Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Bilers for Obama--Important notice!!

Thread Rating
5.00 star(s)
It was an interview done outside of a rock concert, not an Obama rally. Nice spin though. I think it was part of O'Reilly's "No-Spin Zone" :D

Who cares where the people came from, it shows that this country is full of ignorant people. IMO you should have to pass a multiple choice test to be able to vote.
 
Wow, this is getting really sad...

It's funny-if you say you're not voting for McCain you're automatically a liberal, tree hugging puke and you're just not seeing the picture clearly. Yah. I think the thing most people are missing here is the republican party has let the people down BIG TIME. I believe McCain is a poor choice for president-yah, he may have been a war hero and a POW and a senator for years but that doesn't qualify you for president in my book. I think he lacks REAL leadership skills-the kind you would follow without questioning. Furthermore, would most of the people who are endorsing him feel the same if he was running as an independant? Probably not. I think many people will vote for him on Nov. 4 because he has a R next to his name. That should't qualify you for jack. And how about his choice for VP-what a joke. It's obvious watching her on television that she is OUT OF HER LEAGUE. She is out-classed and has done more harm to the McCain ticket than good. What America is really looking for is someone who will speak their plan for America and STICK TO IT. This campaign for both sides is about trying to appeal to ALL voters. They spin their stories every time to say what they think the people want to hear. We need someone who can speak their mind and then take the licks they've got coming. It's impossible for a candidate to be admired by everyone. You're going to have to step on a few toes and let the people decide if you're what they want. I hate to say it, but we're really ALL going to end up shortchanged on Nov. 4.....
 
It's funny-if you say you're not voting for McCain you're automatically a liberal, tree hugging puke and you're just not seeing the picture clearly. Yah. I think the thing most people are missing here is the republican party has let the people down BIG TIME. I believe McCain is a poor choice for president-yah, he may have been a war hero and a POW and a senator for years but that doesn't qualify you for president in my book. I think he lacks REAL leadership skills-the kind you would follow without questioning. Furthermore, would most of the people who are endorsing him feel the same if he was running as an independant? Probably not. I think many people will vote for him on Nov. 4 because he has a R next to his name. That should't qualify you for jack. And how about his choice for VP-what a joke. It's obvious watching her on television that she is OUT OF HER LEAGUE. She is out-classed and has done more harm to the McCain ticket than good. What America is really looking for is someone who will speak their plan for America and STICK TO IT. This campaign for both sides is about trying to appeal to ALL voters. They spin their stories every time to say what they think the people want to hear. We need someone who can speak their mind and then take the licks they've got coming. It's impossible for a candidate to be admired by everyone. You're going to have to step on a few toes and let the people decide if you're what they want. I hate to say it, but we're really ALL going to end up shortchanged on Nov. 4.....

uhhh have you seen anything that obiden has said? yeah obiden personifies class and intelligence. :rolleyes: and oh by the way, if mclame was running as an independent i would still vote for him.:rolleyes: im not strictly party lines.... im for what is in the best interest of the posterity of the country. even if it is minimal... at best. the alternative to me is treasonous and there will be change indeed. mark my words if nobama wins it wont be long before i will not be able to speak as i am. there will be a massive effort to silence the critics. the fairness doctrine will be re-instituted and that will be the death knell of talk-radio and much more communications avenues.

if you dont vote for mccain that doesnt make you anything necesarrily...
except a person who cannot live with mccain as president. you vote for nobama and you are saying that you approve of his ideology. therefore you will be guilty of said(yours)descriptives.
 
Glad I could rile you rup. And the names about Clinton are any better? And to Khaddon, yes I have heard Hannity call him a terrorist. And Palin says he is palling around with terrorists. For the record, that is called fear tactics. Was Ayers every convicted of anything? NO Was anyone killed with his acts? NO Is he a good productive member of our society now? YES.

End of story.

Hannity is not fox news.........he is the conservative side of one show on fox that is designed to have both sides debate the issues.....

that would be like calling kieth oberman msnbc......

and for the record......Ayers was not convicted of anything, but has been very forthcoming about his activities....the federal charges were dismissed against him at the time because a liberal judge thought the FBI illegally wire tapped his phone.....He does not deny any involvement....

and second, yes there was a police officer killed in one of his bombings that took place in sanfrancisco... so you are wrong on at least two claims in your post, and the other about him being a good citizen can certainly be argued with his continued statements about not doing enough back in the 60's/70's....enough bombing
 
Ahhh MTm7....

You've also missed my point. I never said Obama was the clear choice-far from it. I believe we are only having this conversation because we are picking the lesser of two losers. We have no "good" choice. It's like asking you if you 'd rather have herpes or genital warts.....
 
It was an interview done outside of a rock concert, not an Obama rally. Nice spin though. I think it was part of O'Reilly's "No-Spin Zone" :D

Actually I believe it was done by Howard stearn's people (I think, but I could be wrong about that part) I missed much of what was said about the taping of the interviews themselves but i thought I heard that it was done in New York, outside a rally for the Obamessiah by one of Howard Stearns people. It could have been after a concert though:confused:

No spin intended but you libs are always looking to cover you own azz by pointing the finger somewhere else. I can admit when I may have made an incorrect statement because I did not do it intentionaly. CAN YOU?:rolleyes:

Does it really matter or is your responce as good as you could do at the time?:rolleyes:
I mean really does it matter?


BAAA aaa a (Sheep):D

You're gonna have to learn to laugh about all of this because either way, we're all going to be crying soon enough if your man wins. Even you when you have to give up even more of your hard earned money to some slob who feels he is entitled to it because Obama says he is:mad:

You libs all say that McCain is "the same old, same old"
What about the tanker deal that he stopped because Boeing was ripping off the taxpayer by charging too dam much for the contract?
Boeing is my company and I should be furious with McCain for stopping it but when all the dust settles didn't he do exactly what he says he will do if President...Stop overspending, stop corruption in government, make our government more "Transparent"???
Isn't that a pretty good indictment of his character?
He's taking a lot of heat and blame for that but didn't he actually do the right thing?

Yeah...I think he did.

Now it's up to Boeing to price the tanker at a reasonable cost, win back the contract and let the U.S. build the tanker.
But I'll bet they won't because they're too dam greedy which is why I'm on strike right now against them.
But I digress

I'm goin' back to the movie I'm watching
 
You've also missed my point. I never said Obama was the clear choice-far from it. I believe we are only having this conversation because we are picking the lesser of two losers. We have no "good" choice. It's like asking you if you 'd rather have herpes or genital warts.....

OOOOHHH, OOOHHHH OOHHhhh...Can I have the warts please:rolleyes:

OK, Now I'm gone!:D
 
Yeah, logic like, "a person making $250,000 is going to pay 39% tax and cost $97,000 a year." Or "This is going to kill small business!"

People need to look at what Obama is proposing. The $250,000 is compensation OVER that amount and he is going to increase the social security tax on amounts over that to 2 or 3 percent OVER that amount. Then, for people with TAXABLE INCOME over $349,700 he is proposing to put back in place Clinton's tax rate of 39.6% instead of 35%. And that is only on the TAXABLE INCOME OVER that amount. I personally know a person with compensation over $1,000,000 that is not in that tax bracket. It is called tax loopholes for the rich.

Now, for the small business part. Roughly 400,000 small business owners have over $250,000 a year in compensation and far less than that have taxable income over $349,700. There are roughly 30 million tax returns with small businesses in the nation. So, how will that kill small business? Now keep in mind, the majority of the businesses that make that amount are professional service or medical businesses. In most businesses, they hire or buy equipment/inventory not on their tax structure, but on the expected return they get from that employee or equipment/inventory. In my firm, if they hire a staff at $41,000, after medical and other benefits and adding in some for admin and such, the cost is $60,000. They bring in roughly $150,000 off that employee, so the net income is $90,000 for that transaction. Do you think they won't hire that employee because they have to pay an additional $4,500 in taxes to make $90,000.

How is that for logic and facts? Sorry, I am just one dumb liberal.

that makes sense punish people for working hard with 39% tax rate thats just stupid not patriotic. tax the rich to give to the poor that just makes the poor less likely to become a part of society just check france for that
 
You've also missed my point. I never said Obama was the clear choice-far from it. I believe we are only having this conversation because we are picking the lesser of two losers. We have no "good" choice. It's like asking you if you 'd rather have herpes or genital warts.....

LOL! did i miss the point?:rolleyes::D first time that has ever happened... i promise!
 
Last edited:
Honestly guys....Everyones got their opinions and thats great. Vote for the peson that seems right for you. And leave everyone else the *** alone...
 
Premium Features



Back
Top