First,
My utmost condolences to the families of the fallen police officers.
Second,
EricW: thank you for taking the time with your posts. If people are willing to take it to heart, it can help them understand why cops/fire/military think and act the way they do.
Third,
Thank you to the SPD for acting decisively, and not allowing others to be hurt during the process of apprehending this person.
Fourth,
I hope I'm not out of line to offer another point of view on this.
The feeling around the City yesterday was kinda erie. We (fire) can adjust our radios to hear the cops' transmissions, and we kept an ear on them all day. I know we were all on edge.
At work we view each other as family. We live together, we spend holidays together, when we sleep it's in the same rooms, we eat at the same tables - every day. When we're not at work, we frequently hang out together, because we share the same warped schedule. We view the police as family as well.
Good or bad, we're the ones who show up when called, and we support the police for any medical assistance their events may require. Sometimes, this means working to 'save' an individual who was taken into custody for killing someone. It's kinda weird to work as hard as you can to save someone you really don't think deserves to live anymore. But that's my job.
I strongly agree with EricW, in every aspect of what he wrote. I'd like to put some emphasis on a concept: We as a community (local, state, and federal) need to hold our judicial system accountable for their decisions. Several (not just one) poor decisions were made throughout this idiot's criminal/penal process that led to him being out in the public. What's in the past is just that, past. But, we can tell our governmental officials that we are dissatisfied, and that we expect changes in their behaviors that will stop this from happening again.
In efforts to make money under the guise of criminals' civil liberties, the law-abiding public's freedoms have been reduced. The "one-call, that's all" criminal defense lawyers have made a large amount of money using technicalities and loop-holes to put evil folks out on the street. Then, on top of that, those folks that think the guns are what is evil (news flash, a mechanical device does not possess a will to do good or evil, only the user does) want to reduce citizens' ability to protect themselves.
I want to be careful how to present my next question. I don't want to 'armchair quarterback' a very sad situation, but the question is worth presenting: How would the situation have been different if 5 other folks (civilians) in that coffee shop were armed, and TRAINED on how to use their weapon effectively?
No amount of debating will bring the fallen officers back. All we can do is make sure we learn from this, and as citizens do our best to make sure this doesn't happen again.
I too am glad this person will never again harm another member of my family, and I believe justice has been served.
PE