Jason,
Good discussion here...
Good catch on the slip ons/chokes... you are correct... 4 stroke...my bad... dirt season and all
![Face Icon Small Disgusted :face-icon-small-dis :face-icon-small-dis](https://www.snowest.com/forum/images/smilies/old/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif)
.
"Slip on" silencers are usually for street bike (4 stroke) application and yes, in that case, back pressure and tuned length are a huge part of the equation unless you are talking monster hp like in a top fuel car. But, we're not. Like you said, the silencer or muffler on a two stroke is a way to make a tuned two stroke pipe quieter, but if it were part of the whole system tuned for performance, why doesn't FMF or ProCircut require a whole system purchase instead of just offering pipes or silencers? I agree about the EPA and other govt. agencies restricting noise and air emissions enough that a big dollar company like FMF will not get involved.
Aftermarket silencers on 2-stroke mx bikes are NOT part of a whole system... Most are made to reduce weight, add bling, or give the bike a different exhaust note. When the MX aftermarket offers a pipe, they are working within the back-pressures of the existing silencers OR they do make full race exhausts that are sold only as a whole pipe/silencer combo.
From FMF's website:
Taking the proven success of the Powercore 2, FMF created the Powercore 2 Shorty, with a shorter inner core length and aluminum canister. This design results in a finely tuned bolt on performance silencer that maximizes bottom and mid rpm power. An excellent choice for tight tracks and supercross track applications.
Here they talk about the tuning effects on powerband by using/changing the character of the silencer.
I wasn't saying that the reason for lack of money being put into TURBO pipe development was the EPA or other Govt agency being involved in aftermarket exhausts... they are not in regulating aftermarket 2-stroke snowmobile exhausts.... yet.... if they were, CPI, SLP, BMP, Speedwerx and others would have a huge hole in their incomes.
My point with the EPA is that 2 stroke turbo systems will not be developed by "BIG" mfgs with large R&D budgests, IMO, because there is no way for
Production, Consumer offerings from OEM's (that
DO need to meet pollution standards from the EPA & MOE and others)to meet global pollution requirements...
The noise is not a problem that can't be dealt with... but that is a WHOLE DIFFERENT discussion that has been beaten to death in the other forums here.
Large 2 stroke tuned-pipe mfgs, won't be researching/designing/making "turbo pipes" because this is not at all part of their customer base... and will not be.
SLP has been conspicuously out of developing any kind of turbo exhaust to date... this may change as they probably cant afford to pass up the profit.
From what I gather... the "SLP/OVS" offering is
their customization of unfinished SLP non-turbo pipe sheet-metal stampings, modifying them to their standards and welding them up... Not really an SLP pipe anymore and certainly not something that SLP put any money into designing.
Big thanks to OVS and the crew for opening the door and pushing the limits a bit though!!
A couple of examples on the muffler/stinger/pipe relationship...
Try to get a NON race SLP twin set to run with "stinger mufflers"
Try to get a RACE SLP twin set to run well with the non-race muffler.
Try to get the 2010 Dragon to run
well with the stock 2008/09 muffler. (if you could get it to fit the new bracket)
You always see 2 stroke muffler companies claiming HP increase with their muffler or the HP loss from using a competitors...most is BS... but some of it is not..
My point is, that if ANY back-pressure (or lack thereof) is created by the muffler (aka "can") it WILL affect the performance characteristics of the system.
I guess this is where we will need to agree to disagree...
I hope to meet up with you next season with EricW or Allen and do some riding... I got "skunked" for snow in N. Idaho this Feb/March/April...looking fwd to next season.