Nope, the track didn't fail due to manufacturing or material failure.
3" track sh!t the bed
- Thread starter bootz1981
- Start date
Nope, the track didn't fail due to manufacturing or material failure.
How do we know this? I certainly sounds like material failure.
It was obviously material failure.....A messed up front end from hitting a deer in a pickup is material failure. But good luck getting warranty on it.
I would use the word touch lightly. I was pinned roosting dirt like a dirt bike. I happy it didn't completely rip off so I could make it back to town. By no means do I feel like it was a failure of quality. It was a failure of a throttle mined thumb
LMAO! A man that owns up to his mistakes! Cheers!
You say mistake, I say throttle happy brain fart. Plus and exspencive one to boot
That's cheap compared to some of the "mistakes" I made while roadracing - one of them cost about $2k to fix.
R
rubbersidedown
Member
I installed the 3.2 on my Axys two weeks ago. The traction is awesome so far. I can't wait until we really get some snow and see how it works.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Keep us posted on how the 3.2 works.
Did you change drivers?
Rich... I'm a skeptical ...but open to learn something.
When you say "you'll have plenty of room"... how much are you talking about? Where are you measuring?
Can you post pics?
.
When you say "you'll have plenty of room"... how much are you talking about? Where are you measuring?
Can you post pics?
.
The track is on Paul's Axys. I don't remember how much room there is, but Paul was more than happy with the clearance. I don't have any pics. Also, I would rather put a 3.2" in an Axys than a 3" in a Pro-Ride.
Last edited:
I rode with 3 peeps this past weekend here in Wyoming- they were from Spanish Fork Utah- They all had the 3.2 with 7 avids- and ran ok.
2 had the stage 3 SLP
The 3.2 is pretty tight especially at the bend top side in the tunnel- and less than a finger width in the front/
Bottomless powder all weekend I'll say it again yes it was bottomless!!- was there a difference?.. yep - huge -nope- not night and day for sure in the snow conditions we had.
With a little base I think this will be the ticket especially with the snow depth we have currently.
I spoke to Paul Yesterdy @ FNI and he did say it was tight also but the trade off was noticable..
S/C
2 had the stage 3 SLP
The 3.2 is pretty tight especially at the bend top side in the tunnel- and less than a finger width in the front/
Bottomless powder all weekend I'll say it again yes it was bottomless!!- was there a difference?.. yep - huge -nope- not night and day for sure in the snow conditions we had.
With a little base I think this will be the ticket especially with the snow depth we have currently.
I spoke to Paul Yesterdy @ FNI and he did say it was tight also but the trade off was noticable..
S/C
Last edited:
Ride the machine in snow,they last longer.
Rockmobile?
Gravelmobile?
Creekcrossingmobile?
Treemobile?
I always wondered why they called it a SNOWmobile.
I was at Wolf Creek last week and dont remember hitting anything but when I got home I put sled up on lift and 1 lug in the middle of the track was missing. The sled has huge power but rode my 2013 three seasons hitting all kinds of sh--t and never even tore a lug. I think there may be alot more issues as the season move on.
Similar threads
- Featured