Sweet. I saw all the same things this am but didn't have time to post.
And your analysis is spot on IMO also.
I was about to say the same thing. Sure doesn't look like my X3 lugs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sweet. I saw all the same things this am but didn't have time to post.
And your analysis is spot on IMO also.
]I've seen the same failure on X3's with 8 tooth drivers that run an extended drive... at the root like that...usually heat delam from too fast of trail use in marginal hard snow conditions... I've seen the same on 2.5" tracks as well.
Even on these new drum molded tracks... Camoplast says that the number one issue is caused by heat in the track.... flexing the paddle back and forth with all that leverage on a hard-pack trail can take it's toll.
The first pic is not an X3... the lug tips are different... looks like an early model, non-durm-molded, 3" track.
With all of that dirt on the track...It was definitely run in marginal...or even dry, conditions... and really looks like heat delam.
I'd expect the same result with a 9tooth driver in those conditions. .
It will be interesting to see what happens next year when the T3 lands in the hands of the masses.
I couldn't agree with you more !!!!!
I'm just thinking out loud: the nerve of the DOO engineers putting an extended chaincase in those sleds. Don't they read the threads. The threads say you don't need it, and they are always right aren't they?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think they are going to run a 7t as well.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think they are going to run a 7t as well.
I knew. It seemed by your post you didn't. Unless there's some advantage for running a extended chain case and 7t drivers that saves tracks compared to just running a 7t?
I have a Carl's set up with the 162 X3, their revalved shocks and a heavy spring on the rear shock (235 lbs.). It works perfectly. It does run hotter on the trail but I have never been over 160 even on an icy trail. It works great in spring snow conditions uphill and downhill. I have several friends who put the 156 X3 tracks on their 155s. They have had issues with wheelies and trenching. I have seen neither problem with the 162. It will lift the skis easier than the old track but it is not a detriment. I actually like the transfer better with the X3 than I did with the stock track. The center port/Avid 7 tooth driver system reduces the vibration and noise that are evident with the non ported track too. I did not want the anti stab kit and it is not required when you run the center port with the Avid drivers. Finally, my track is warranted. The center ported tracks that Carl's bought from Camoplast were punched at the factory.
[/QUOTE]]
I need to take more training or something so I can tell from a picture that a track has been run in "marginal" "dry" and "looks like heat delam" condition.
The few hundred 3" tracks I've sold and all the warranties I've done over last 4+ years has taught me nothing! Shame on me!
I only stood at the overhead door of the dealership and said "man that's a BIG muddy parking lot " This 3" paddle track was on the service managers sled.
goridedoo PLEASE see above statement^^
M/H: PLEASE, I would be so grateful to have you share pictures of the new X3 track failure on extended chain case with 8 tooth drivers. I've never personally seen that combination failure or had a customer or non customer tell me of it. (I have to get out more) LOL
"Camoplast says that the number one issue is caused by heat in the track.... flexing the paddle back and forth" Who is this person? Another sales manager? or the head "spin guy" himself. That's not what the warranty people tell me.
.[/SIZE]
TracksCanada is the snarky sarcasm a sales technique you use a lot?
Maybe try and post your opinion(which is backed by experience so I give it a lot more weight than most posters) and leave the doucheyness out.