Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A 3" pitch driver has 3" between the base of the tooth at the rim of the driver (not the tip of the tooth)...
3" x 8 teeth = approx 24" circumference of the driver rim....
3" x 7 teeth = approx 21" circumference of the driver rim....
2.86" x 8 teeth = approx 22.8" circumference of the driver rim...
or in other words
Circumference / ∏ = Diameter
3" pitch x 8 tooth.... 24/∏ = approx 7.64" diameter ... 3.82" from driveshaft center to inside surface of the track
3" pitch x 7 tooth.... 21/∏ = approx 6.68" diameter ... 3.34" from driveshaft center to inside surface of the track
2.86" pitch x 8 tooth.... 22.8/∏ = approx 7.25" diameter ... 3.625" from driveshaft center to inside surface of the track
A 3" pitch 8 tooth driver will push any given track about .195" closer to the tunnel than a 8 tooth, 2.86" pitch driver. If you add the extra 0.10" of a camo extreme 2.5" track.... mind you in the 3" pitch... you will decrease the tunnel clearance by more than 1/4" over the 2.4" polaris running the 8 tooth 2.86" pitch drivers. This is why the 7 tooth drivers are necessary.
The 3" x 7 tooth driver brings the inside surface of the track .28" closer (over 1/4") closer to the swing arm rub pads.
To answer your question (finally, because I had a brain fart in not reading your question carefully)
For the 2.25" track... on 3" pitch, 8 tooth drivers... an approximation... I'm assuming the Cat Power Claw is a single ply track.... the clearance would open up by the .15" shorter lug LESS the added radius of the 3" pitch, 8 tooth driver (.195") or about .045" Less clearance than the stock Dragon single ply 2.4"... wow... less clearance than the stock 2.4... Who da thunk it???
I wanted to figure this out anyway for a friend.
My brain hurts now... and I probably made some mistakes!!
http://www.slp.cc/catalog.cfm?pageID=detail&catalogID=3&catID=16&productID=1044
These new track drive spockets allow the use of 3" pitch tracks on Polaris IQ models with splined driveshafts. These drivers only drive on the internal track lugs to allow them to be used with closed window tracks. Sold per Each $69.95
BTW... even with the Avid Combo drivers... Keep the track tension stock on the track... a loose track allows the track to distort, the paddles to fold over a bit more than normal and gives poor performance.
I believe that loose tracks that distort under load are the major reason for "stabbing" NOT the fact that the rails are trimmed or the teeth are "sucking" the track up between the the driver and rail... a tight track cant get "sucked up" in that gap. Early M-Cats had crappy rear suspension geometry that HAD to run the track loose... those are the ones that gave rise to the phenomona of stabbing...loose tracks to follow suit... stock Doos dont have stabbing problems, they have short rail tips and no issues with stabbing on a wholesale level.
The new single ply tracks will stretch more quickly than previous models and need to be checked for proper tension quite often (tensioning instructions in your Owners manual)
Proper tension = better performance than a loose (out of spec) track.
Here is my take on it... IMO....
Ski Doo, Arctic Cat, Yamaha and now Polaris (on the Factory installed drivers on the IQ-Race sleds) all run COMBO drivers (different than a true extrovert driver)
There is a difference between an "EXTROVERT" driver and a "COMBO" driver
A combo driver [eg Avid] drives from both the involute "nubs" on the inside of the track and the windows of the the track .... it does not rely on the "teeth" of the extro-portion of this "combo" unless you start to ratchet. A TRUE extrovert does not drive at all from the involute nubs on the inside of the track (eg the center driver on a dragon).
Some stuff I've learned from the diff engineers in the sled world.
Looser tracks allow the paddles to fold over easier... a part of the equation that most dont think of and is the MAIN reason why (I think) Jack Struthers says that a tight track works better than a loose one...it hooks up better, expecially in more setup conditions like on a track or hill-drags, or spring time climbing (or our average Sierra cement)
The people with Extrovert (AKA combo) drivers seem to want to run the track real loose and feel it frees up HP...a loose track allows for distortion of the track as it leaves the driver and makes the track more suceptable to "stabbing"... With the extros, I dont look at them as a way to allow a track to be run looser... I look at it as a prevention of ratcheting in the high-demand situations.
I think the "combo" drivers are the best option, but run almost as tight as the stock drivers AND run the more slippery hyperfax as well as popping back on some idlers for spring conditions as well.
Extros, IMO, are mandatory on high hp sleds... BUT they should be run at the correct, not loose, tension... similar to normal tracks/stock-drivers.
When they are running normally, not ratcheting, the teeth of the extro are not even contacting the track or the clips and only drive from the involute portion on the inside of the track.
The first of the M-series cats had poor geometry that tightended up the track when it worked thru the travel and caused all kinds of problems that was the big factory push to extros and the one that gave the extros and stabbing a bad rap
Do NOT run the track too loose.... many people do with extros and end up stabbing the rails thru the windows... IMO, too loose of tracks by people with Extrovert drivers is the main cause of stabbing track windows with the rails ("stabbing")... most sleds do not, IMO, need anti stabbing kits...
There is a difference between an extrovert and a combo driver... unless it is ratcheting, the teeth on a combo driver never touch the track.
Track tension is critical for maintaining correct suspension
operation. If the track tension is too loose it may cause the track
to slip or “ratchet” on the drive shaft drivers and cause the track
and rear suspension durability problems. If the track is too tight
it will wear down the rail slides, reduce top speeds, cause rear
suspension vibration and cause track and rear suspension
durability problems.
1. Lift the rear of the machine and place a jack stand or secure
the rear of the machine so that the track is off of the
ground.
2. Start the engine and slowly let the engine turn the track
over. This will warm up the track for a correct
measurement.
3. Shut off the engine.
4. Place a 10 lb. (4.54kg) weight at point (A). Point (A) is 16”
(41cm) ahead of the rear idler shaft (E).
5. Measure the distance (D) between the rail slider and the
track. This measurement should fall with in the
measurement range for the appropriate vehicle.
6. If adjustment is needed, loosen up the lock nuts (B) on each
side.
7. Loosen up the idler shaft bolts (F).
8. Turn each adjuster bolt (C) toward the idler wheel
(clockwise) if you need less of a measurement. Turn the
adjuster bolt (C) toward the front of the sled
(counterclockwise) if you need a greater measurement.
9. When you achieve the correct tension listed below, torque
the lock nuts (B) and idler shaft bolts on each side to 35 ftlb
(48 N-m).
NOTE: Track alignment affects track tension.
Misalignment will cause excessive wear to the track
and slide rails. Excessive slide wear will appear on
units with the track tension set too tight (or below
measurement specification).
Correct track tension for the RMK's..
3/8" - 1/2"
(1-1.3cm)
...Quote: Mountainhorse
Cats and their suspension geometry are a whole different ball of wax... plus they run a big 3" driver window...and most run at least 1" free hang on the cats...
Polaris runs combo drivers on their Race sleds without anti stab kits BUT they run stock tension (10 lbs on track in front of the rear scissor ... 3/8" below hyfax) Those sleds had the pizz run out of them... all with shorter rail tips and the combo drivers.
IMO.. MOST of the stabbing issues are tension related.
The Cat suspensions really tightend up the track at full travel... especially on a tail hard landing ... the track got real tight and the rail tips push right thru the window...
Anti stab kits cant hurt though and only add 4 lbs to your suspension.
So what is the purpose of changing the stock 155 track and what year is this on ?
Is the 07 700 track different than the 08 and 09's .
Would this be an upgrade in the deep powder ?
Are there better alternatives.
Like which would work the best in deep powder out of all tracks ?
Thank's
so If I understand your math the 3.0 pitch 7 tooth is the one to use with the powderclaw as it will increase clearance by .15 inch,,, am I understanding this correctly???if so I will need to order the smaller drivers. if so do I need to move the suspension back an inch or with the 153 inch Ice age rails using 8 inch rear wheels do the trick??? and then what gearing would you recommend????In short... IMO... If you run the smaller diameter 7 tooth, 3" pitch drivers and stock diameter rear wheels.... you SHOULD be able to run the stock rails with the 2" shorter 153" track. If you want to run the Avid Combo drivers, you will need to trim the rails back at the tips. If you want to run the 8 tooth drivers... IMO... you will need to get some custom rails (approx $300 for the pair... your stock take-offs will sell for about $200) to allow proper location/adjustment of the rear axle.
Running the proper, stock tension... even with Combo drivers and trimmed rails, IMO, you will not need to run an anti-stab kit. Only when people run sag (free-hang) in thier tracks do they have trouble with stabbing.
Here's some info from a previous post...
the powerlcaw track is the best track hands down for all around riding... great for boondocking hooks up great in all situations.. i will have one on my sled in a month