W
Wyoming T/A
ACCOUNT CLOSED
i told him he should offer to buy kyles sled and then kyle can get yours or his dads.![]()
that would work -
![Beer :beer; :beer;](https://www.snowest.com/forum/images/smilies/beer.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i told him he should offer to buy kyles sled and then kyle can get yours or his dads.![]()
Pipe Y-pipe can?????? If not leave it alone. Tach could be off 200rpm either way. If so shoot for 8000rpm's will add track speed!!!!![]()
that would work --we'll have a couple for sale
![]()
My 09 M8 with a 162 and slp pipe will turn 45mph track speed at 9000ft in a hard climb in soft snow. I climbed against 4 xp's 3 weeks ago in real soft snow and I outclimbed every one of them and two of them were 163's. My buddies XP did the second best and it has the 154, I was not impressed with the 163's. If your buddy wants to make that 09 M8 even better than install the slp pipe and he will really like it. It makes the midrange and topend much stronger. My buddy on his 09 xp and my cat are neck and neck in a race with mine finally taking him when we are wide open by a tiny bit.
We own both 09 M8 162 and 09 XP 163..
OUR findings show that the power-claw track has nothing on the XP track in the real deep powder except at slow speeds. When climbing they work about the same but let off the throttle in a deep powder pull and the Claw comes up on top faster and easier..Other than that.. they are equal.. We have done many comparisons in the 650 miles we have rode this season.
Our findings show the XP as the superior "high-marker" and also faster on the hard packed. BUT... the 09 M8 is a fantastic machine!
I have always owned both Cats and Ski Doos and even a Polaris here and there... You can not go wrong with either the CAT or the DOO in 2009.. They are BOTH excellent sleds!!! Since I trade throughout the day from the XP to the Cat and back... I can tell you that they are 2 totally different sleds.. But, after you adjust to the other.. they are about equal in everything..
The DOO does out-power/out climb the Cat but, it should, it is lighter and has more HP from the start..
I think anybody looking for a new sled could not have 2 better sleds to choose from.. I would base the decision on how good the dealer is in your area...
Kelsey
The end to track width myth..... When climbing in Pow length is more important than width. Here's why....trenching kills...and trenching on an incline is solved by weight transfer. The longer the track the more track you have behind the center of gravity.
The square inch argument doesn't apply b/c the track is enlongated not round.
For example: I put a 166 on my 05 Poo to replace my 159. With 159 it would trench say 3 ft. in deep and steep. Same hill same snow with 166 trench only say 2 ft.
1. The hill is already steep enough, don't make it steeper by trenching.
Think about this visual. You have a bulldozer with a 16 inch wide track that is 24 feet long. That will allow say 10 feet of the track to be on the ground as a footprint. That equals 1920 square inches of foot print. As a constuction worker those baby will climb most anything despite weighing 50-80k lbs.
Now take a big double drum asphalt roller. In fairness visualize the roller has grousers for traction like the dozer. Each drum is 6 foot diameter and 10 feet wide. Lets assume that it also has a footprint of 1920 square inches.
Obviously not the same situation but maybe easier to visualize. I ask you which one would climb better.
At slow speeds on flatter terrain the 16 wide would no doubt have more flotation. But as soon as you turn up the hill it all about length, attack angle, and weight transfer.
i told him he should offer to buy kyles sled and then kyle can get yours or his dads.![]()
This ones on it's way to Cutler for a hair dryer as we speak.........With porting, piped and head plus Cutlers clutching and the 09 M8 is a sweet ride.
OT
I'd say this too!! Nice honest write-up!