Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great info and a nice job on the install!!!
Price?
ETA?
DIY install?
Chaz
nice work throw it in a C3 carbon chassy mmmmmm!!!!! hey are those Br-Tech vents?Boostwurx and APP have teamed up to provide hardcore sledders with the best possible carbed turbo kit on the market. The intercooled XP turbo kits have a flow tested intercooler that provides 12-15hp over nonintercooled turbo kits and the ceramic coated boost tubes are lighter and will not discolor like stainless steel. Kits use Autometer and AEM gauges not some cheep bargain brand and come with a gauge bracket to mount to the bars.
Kits have been tested for 4 years (on the HO Rev to start) and prove to run excellent at elevation. The 53 series kits make 230-235hp at 10psi of boost and the 66 series kits will pump out 250+ at 15-16psi. On the XP the 53 kit only ads 5.5lbs to the stock weight of the sled!!! Lets do the math? 230hp to 456lbs= 1.98 pounds per HP!!! 255hp to 465lbs= 1.82 pounds per HP. We recomend of course to true and weld the crank and prep the rods ect when running more than 12psi. Check out www.abspow.ca for more pics and pricing.
Boostwurx and APP have teamed up to provide hardcore sledders with the best possible carbed turbo kit on the market. The intercooled XP turbo kits have a flow tested intercooler that provides 12-15hp over nonintercooled turbo kits and the ceramic coated boost tubes are lighter and will not discolor like stainless steel. Kits use Autometer and AEM gauges not some cheep bargain brand and come with a gauge bracket to mount to the bars.
Kits have been tested for 4 years (on the HO Rev to start) and prove to run excellent at elevation. The 53 series kits make 230-235hp at 10psi of boost and the 66 series kits will pump out 250+ at 15-16psi. On the XP the 53 kit only ads 5.5lbs to the stock weight of the sled!!! Lets do the math? 230hp to 456lbs= 1.98 pounds per HP!!! 255hp to 465lbs= 1.82 pounds per HP. We recomend of course to true and weld the crank and prep the rods ect when running more than 12psi. Check out www.abspow.ca for more pics and pricing.
Quick question
Also you notice a 40 degree change in temp with an intercooler that's not a hole lot. The wind good have changed heck you could have picked a different line on a hill causing the turbo to not work so hard. Need more evidence before I go slapping a intercooler on my sled and adding weight and turbo lag to the equation not to mention a big heat sink. I have seen to many turbo builder throw these "kits" together and not do any test. I would like to see some testing before I go a throw out 6 grand for a turbo kit. That worth half that.
Not trying to question your product or call you out just want some hard evidence on these numbers that you posted.
Thanks
Mike
The testing to find the perfect intercooler setup for the Aero turbo, That has been the goal.
In testing a turbo kit at 12psi of boost with an intake temp of 100 degrees in comparison to an intake temp of 60 degrees was a consistant 12-15hp gain.
I would think that would be huge. If someone said to me that I could run consistantly with an intercooled setup and not risk possible detonation or a lean condition due to excess intake heat, I think that would be huge. Currently I have customers running 9-10psi intercooled with a turbo cut head on pump fuel at 6500ft and over. As far as comparing I am sure Boostwurx would look forward to it. Revy, Vail ,Blue river,Golden, Radium, Mcbride ect. I am sure there are 25+ different kits running any different weekend in the hills.
Are all of your temperatures in Celsius? -You mentioned in a later post the ambient temp was 18 deg C, so I would guess that these temps are C also?
The ambient temps were about 18 Degrees celcius. As far as run time the more boost we run the easier it was to achieve the hotter temps used for our comparison. Each sled ran with air passing through the intercoolers to simulate more or less speed as well as we used nitrous to cool the intercoolers to achieve some of our comparison readings. I also have tested non and intercooled sleds in the same areas on same days (6500ft -8 ) and under the same run times the non intercooled and intercooler temps were different. Long pulls is where charge temps really heat up (over 1min ). In looking at the data we collected it would prove that in most cases the ambient would be colder that where we tested (18) thus leading to further cooling of the intercoolers. In any case we have variables in engine, pipe heat underhood, hotter ambients in the spring, ect. In a properly vented sled the intercoolers that I have run stay at around room temps when riding.
( The Intercoolers work )