Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't forget, they tried to force nuclear back in the 70's. Dang near bankrupted a bunch of power producers, when the greenies started protesting, and shutting down plants, an piling regulations on them.
I like nuclear, but you have to get them built before the greenies get organized, and get a new crop of politicians in office, that shut the projects down mid stream. An unfinished nuclear complex, is worse than worthless.
Heck just start building nuclear power plants, you don't have to shoot for a 100. Get 10 started. That would be a great change.
It's certainly one of the cleanest and most efficient forms of energy known to man. Ironically, the "green" sources aren't very clean when you consider the resources needed to build them.
A wind turbine takes about 6 months to net zero, then it is all beneficial after that.
That plan would be great, if we had a place to put the waste I believe that is the only issue right now with them.
The problem with wind turbines is you need wind to make them work. Funny thing is that average wind speeds are falling off. What do you do for power when the whirly birds are still?
http://www.knmi.nl/samenw/hydra/faq/u_trend_en.htm
course our infrasturcture is ready to run nuke power. And we still need better storage for wind and the whole wind turbines in the horizion, etc
You read that book I told ya about yet?
That is why when Obama said he wanted to infuse a lot of cash into the infastruture of the country I was all for it. Too bad he didn't follow thru.
Yep, I was disappointed in that too, greatly disappointed. I guess we just have different definitions of "infrastructure"... lol
It's called a "Fast Reactor" (Discover Magazine)Nuclear waste:
There is a technology under development that allows for the reprocessing of the spent fuel rods that will get rid of 99% of the radioactivity. Technology will be ready in 10 years.
I read that on Popular Mechanics in the latest issue......
So even that argument of "where are we going to put all this waste" seems to be a red hearing.
If people are so worried about spent fuel rods, I volunteer to put all the spent fuel rods in protective containers in a cave below my house.......
like ten pages...
Actually it is not ready for nuke power. Well it depends. Where you putting those nukes? Were ever you put them, you need lots of transmission, and only one line section to a load center is poor from a reliablity stand point.
Yep lots more storage would be good, but more transmission gets rid of that issue, and the ability to vary load (demand side metering) has the effect to take away some of that. Geographic dispersion is another means though..