2006 CMX Turbo 800 with a 162 track would be a good lightweight starter sled.
Is that one of those OLD Edge chassis from the 90's?
![Face Icon Small Wink :face-icon-small-win :face-icon-small-win](https://www.snowest.com/forum/images/smilies/old/face-icon-small-wink.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2006 CMX Turbo 800 with a 162 track would be a good lightweight starter sled.
Is that one of those OLD Edge chassis from the 90's?![]()
Yep, I've never seen one on the hill but always see them in the shop! The one I saw had carbon trailing arms (don't buy a sled with trailing arms!) and a belt drive.
If you are going to trash someones product then tell us why? What is wrong with the belt drive? What is wrong with the light weight trailing arm? How does it compair to the A-arms on the CMX Rocket?![]()
I did tell you why. I stated that the only time I've seen one is in the shop for repairs (I don't know why, just made the observation). I also did not say there was anything wrong with the belt drive. I think it's best to get a sled w/o trailing arms and jump up to true independent front suspension.
If you are going to trash someones product then tell us why? What is wrong with the belt drive? What is wrong with the light weight trailing arm? How does it compair to the A-arms on the CMX Rocket?![]()
I never said there was anything wrong with the belt drive or the carbon being used to reduce weight. If you go back to my original post, I just said that sled has both (an observation). The only things I said bad were that the one I knew of was always in the shop and that trailing arms suck. C'mon, they do...how much travel did you guys have on the old style sleds compared to today's sleds? Don't be so defensive because you or your buddy has a CMX.
You're telling me that if you had roughly $7000, you would buy a CMX? Sounds like you are trying to sell the wrong sled to someone.
I've ridden with one before so I will give it a shot; When you break a carbon fiber trailing arm (and they aren't hard to shatter) there is alot of money involved and you better have a few extra with you because no one will have one. The belt will break if it ever gets loose or you land a jump with your thumb on the throttle. I speak from experience, the guy I was with broke one in Dubois (jumping), put his spare on and promply broke that one too. He did eventually find another guy in town that had a CMX and borrowed one from him. It took about a day and a half of riding and mucho $ out of his vacation.
Not trying to sell anything just responding to your "observation". You opened your mouth and now your panties are in a wad. You saw a sled in the shop and drew conclusions. I just don't think you have a clue. You say $7000??? That plus your last new sled won't touch one. I am real sorry if I upset your soft little tummy. I'll try to be more like you, "POOs suck because I saw one in a shop". That sounds as stupid as what you said. I'm neither defensive nor bothered by what you have said. So let me end by saying the same thing as you "JMO".![]()
The title of this thread is "what is best for backcountry" Not "what will go the highest on the hill"
In my experience the factory sleds are more reliable and that is one of the requirements in the boonies
If you are going to trash someones product then tell us why? What is wrong with the belt drive? What is wrong with the light weight trailing arm? How does it compare to the A-arms on the CMX Rocket?![]()