• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Who is into guns?

Fosgate

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Mar 28, 2005
10,993
5,295
113
Rapid City, SD


Would love a Tavor and a Scar 17. The Hk, if I had the disposable income. AUG i would bother with. The AK looks interesting. I’ve Owned 4 in the past and while I like it the rifle, the steel cased ammo is absolute trash. I would however like to see that in an Ak-74 5.35x39 round. (Fun fact that round was a pretty wicked velocity like being a 220 swift in the Tavtical would. Punches through some stuff you would think of)

Another I would add is the Sig Sauer (xm5/XM250) that just won the military contract. Weird that the selected the 6.8mm cartridge with the ballistics that will punch through Level 3 body armor (highest level avail to civilians) but won’t punch through level 4). Almost like if the rifle was captured in numbers that they don’t want a rifle and round capable of punching through issued armor but ouch through civilian armor. Weird right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

laneends

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Sep 23, 2016
38
51
18
Washington
From the John Birch Society:

Several unconstitutional gun-control bills have been introduced in Congress. These include:

H.R. 698, the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2023”: This bill would ban the possession, sale, manufacture, and transfer of firearms erroneously classified as “assault weapons.”
H.R. 768, the “Extreme Risk Protection Order Expansion Act of 2023”: This bill would implement a national “red flag” law. “Red flag” laws are particularly dangerous as they allow the government to confiscate law-abiding Americans’ firearms — without due process or even an accusation of a crime — merely because they are labeled as “dangerous.” This violates both the 2nd and 4th Amendments. Furthermore, “red flag” laws wouldn’t even have prevented the Nashville shooting.

.
H.R. 715, the “Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2023”: This bill would enact draconian federal background checks for firearm transfers between ordinary American citizens. Expanded background checks will result in citizens needing the government’s permission to own or purchase a firearm — violating the Second Amendment — and it also would inevitably result in a national gun registry. Such a registry would enable the government to easily confiscate people’s weapons at a future date, similar to what actually happened in other countries like Australia.


H.R. 625, the “Keep Americans Safe Act”: This bill would limit magazines to 15 rounds of ammunition or less — this bill would not “keep Americans safe.”
H.R. 660, “Ethan’s Law”: This bill would Americans to store their firearms in a certain way inside their own homes — a major violation of privacy — if a minor is present. Violating the law would lead to criminal penalties, including the seizure and forfeiture of the firearm.
H.R. 2392, the “Pause for Gun Safety Act”: This bill would mandate a national, seven-day waiting period for firearm transfers, another unconstitutional intrusion upon the right of self-defense

H.R. 2403, the “Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2023”: This bill would require a nationwide background check period of at least 10 days for firearm purchases.
 

Hawkster

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 22, 2010
8,136
6,387
113
AK
Who needs a gun safe when the FBI just makes a calls to access.

 
Premium Features