track length diffrence

[suitcase]

Thats about where I am 190 to 195 depending on the week LOL. I just not realy wanting to give up any tight tech. riding due to the longer track. IMO I dont see that happening with only that much diffrence in length. But I have never owned a 163 always gone with the 151 's and the 155's. just goinf off of others that have used them in this type of riding that alot of us seam to do these days.

 

[suitcase]

how many days do you think you will be up for this yr? 100 150 lol.

 

[oregonfarmer]

Thursday's rides I'm in this year. Missed all the good ones last year.

 

[suitcase]

Im sure i can fit thurs. in my schedule...

 

[suitcase]

im sure i can fit thurs. in my schedule.

 

[8emup]

Thats about where I am 190 to 195 depending on the week LOL. I just not realy wanting to give up any tight tech. riding due to the longer track. IMO I dont see that happening with only that much diffrence in length. But I have never owned a 163 always gone with the 151 's and the 155's. just goinf off of others that have used them in this type of riding that alot of us seam to do these days.

163 and you won't ever look back I don't believe these are just for bigs guys. They just go better in the really deep snow you can slow down a little more and get going again. I really don't find spinning donuts any more difficult. If you do a lot of jumping then I'd go 155. At 49 I'm not a jumper any more, for me it's about deep untracked powder in the trees.

 

[Zrider]

Suitcase:

Go "63". You won't regret it. And they work in the trees very well.

 

[suitcase]

it has arrived and I hope it will work well for me, Still not 100% sure that the 163 can get around as well as the D8 155. I only have one more day to change my mind LOL. Im sure once I get on it in the trees i will love it.

 

[flying frenchman]

Go with the 163. you won't regret it.

 

[oregonfarmer]

You always have mine to compare with. They will be the same except for track length. If you smoke me in the trees I'm blaming the track every time.

 

[Dootimes2]

I rode a 07 rev with a 174 x 2.5 for 4 years in the tight trees and it just flat out worked. I also rode the wifes 07 rev with a 162 x 2.5 and the only difference was with the 174 you could go slower in the really tight spots and not get stuck as much. I doubt you will even be able to tell the difference in handling between the two in the trees, but you will be able to tell the difference in deep snow performance. GET THE 163. Can't wait to hop on mine.

 

[SWEETXPBEATCH]

nearly 60" of track on the ground with the 163"

I went out dropped my 11' 163 on the ground and measured how much track is on the ground. I would be curious how much Doo and AC 162's have on the floor? Anyone else interested in the difference? I am baffled at how much track Polaris is able to get to the snow.

 

[suitcase]

You can blame it on the track, I will call it something else. LOL

It would be interesting to know what cat and do have on the floor. Sixty inches is a far amount of rubber getting layed down.

 

[IQ?]

Go with 163"...
Downhill zeroturn-park it on its side.Help your stuck shorttrack
(155" Buddy)
Then give it a kick and go up again....

 

[suitcase]

Now thats funny !! Then I can take some to post on hear of him stuck LMAO .

I just call and talked to my dealer and I am sticking with the 63.
Thanks all, Keep the imput coming!

Im sure he will have to put me incheck for that statement...