If I used a 410, 412, 417 ramp then the clicker position would have to be down in 2.
If I use a 413, 414, 415 ramp then the clicker position would have to be in 3 or 4.
Whatever clicker the calibration ends up in, it ends up in that. Can only work so much with the ramps that are available unless one comes up with a completely different ramp. (to which I did but still ends up in clicker 3 or 4).....sorry.
I could make a ramp that runs down in clicker 1 or 2 but I don't because I've studied enough about it that at this time I don't have the time available to do so. Presently I been making a ramp that works as if it's in clicker 3 or 4 for in the snow, but has a curve on it like clicker 2 or 1 for on the road.
You have to work in a timely manner with what's available.
If one's not satisfied, then get at doing your own thing, that's what I did. get your credit card and warm it up and prepared to be satisfied in a future time...
...or leave it stock.
----------------------------------
grief i have enuff crap in my pack without having to bring a torque wrench ,puller bolt, loctite button clips , etc etc
-If you are going to come up with your own calibration and it's going to fly right out of the garage without calibrating the flyweight for your personal requirements - I ask you to invite me to observe this, just give me 48 hours notice and I'll be there.
I want to see this because of the variation of rpms I've seen with different drivers. I mean, Im 245 and I calibrate to get my engine to run at 8300 rpms, but when my skinny little buddy of 170 lbs gets on my sled, the engine hits the rev limiter sometimes. Dalyn can clicker down one and yeah it runs better but he still has to mess with the flyweight to get 8300 but because of the curve of the 414 ramp, it backshift kind of sluggish at faster speeds. He'd just rather add 1.5 gram more in the present clicker and run my sled to get 8300.
Regarding weights and clicker recommendation, I make sure that I quote known established sources like Aaen/BRP/Acat/Cutler/Fett, because im just a pisshole in the snowbank in all this clutching biz that isn't very credible. If someone going to say something about me, I cover my arse with known printed material (because of guys like ot who know more than anyone)
------------------------------
Far as focusing on the secondary. From what I've read (Aaen/BRP/Acat/Cutler) say the secondary is a torque converter. It compares the load from the engine vs. the ground and variates the up/back shift while under full throttle. I have read it is the connection between the engine and the ground. I also read here n there about all this fuss about what helix angle works and what doesn't and if you don't give out the helix angles and spring forces then yer a jerk that don't want people to get their sled to run right... I mean, I can remember years ago when I started in all of this I would ask questions and guys would say "use this" or "use that" and these things didn't work. Then the manufacturers use a 44/33 this year, then a 42 that year then a 43/47 this year and a 50/40 on another year.
...so I figure, heck this might be something worth looking into this secondary thing and study a bit more.