Tell your Governor to say "No" to Syrian refugees
- Thread starter Mafesto
- Start date
Already did last night!
Problem is Iowa is not and I heard already they have a influx of refugee's in Davenport. Whats to stop them from crossing into other states? This is a big freaking problem.
My liberal brother lives in Seattle and told me last night....."You rednecks are just overreacting" REALLY!!! I asked him if there were 3 Syrians and 2 were good but one was bad would he let them live in HIS house?
People need to wake up and FAST!!
Problem is Iowa is not and I heard already they have a influx of refugee's in Davenport. Whats to stop them from crossing into other states? This is a big freaking problem.
My liberal brother lives in Seattle and told me last night....."You rednecks are just overreacting" REALLY!!! I asked him if there were 3 Syrians and 2 were good but one was bad would he let them live in HIS house?
People need to wake up and FAST!!
We're supposed to get 25000 refugees by the end of the year up here.
Not sure why our leaders don't try and deal with the problem within syria rather than bringing the problem here.
Set up refugee camps guarded by the military and then send in troops to deal with isis. Bringing a handful of refugees over here isn't going to solve any problems.
Not sure why our leaders don't try and deal with the problem within syria rather than bringing the problem here.
Set up refugee camps guarded by the military and then send in troops to deal with isis. Bringing a handful of refugees over here isn't going to solve any problems.
Where did your "1/3 are going to cause problems" come from? All identified participants in the Paris bombings have been European nationals. Many were already on watch lists. They weren't refugees. Should we ban all Europeans?
but if they do come please send them to Starbucks.......excellent chances of employment there.
Also, besides throwing out the UNwelcome mat, I believe there is absolutely 0 states can do to prevent these prospective Starbuck employees from entering any State of their choice.
Also, besides throwing out the UNwelcome mat, I believe there is absolutely 0 states can do to prevent these prospective Starbuck employees from entering any State of their choice.
Last edited:
It's cool. I heard property in Syria is going for dirt cheap ATM. I think we should all pool our resources to go over there and buy 1/4 of the country, take care of business, and create a strong democratic society. Then watch them get mad from every other country imaginable and say how it is their land and they are the proper owners and we essentially become Israel 2.0.
Last edited:
Two points.
First, they actually weren't refugees. They arrived on tourist visas, and their father applied for political asylum after they were already here. So a completely different situation that is currently being discussed.
Second. If they were, why the outrage about refugees now? Where was it right after Boston? The refugee program has been going since the 80s. Hundreds of thousands of middle east refugees are already here.
ISIS would really like us to alienate Muslims. It makes their recruiting much easier.
First, they actually weren't refugees. They arrived on tourist visas, and their father applied for political asylum after they were already here. So a completely different situation that is currently being discussed.
Second. If they were, why the outrage about refugees now? Where was it right after Boston? The refugee program has been going since the 80s. Hundreds of thousands of middle east refugees are already here.
ISIS would really like us to alienate Muslims. It makes their recruiting much easier.
check this out.....Welcome to Missoula and to Montana:
http://missoulian.com/news/local/re...cle_33c84357-8f46-50cb-b8bb-cea654dd047f.html
http://missoulian.com/news/local/re...cle_33c84357-8f46-50cb-b8bb-cea654dd047f.html
Because Obama is hell bent on flooding our country with refugees & illegal aliens during the time he has left.
I am against this because.....
1 - Who's gonna pay for it?
We simply cannot afford it.
2 - Every child they bear here is now a citizen.
Muslims & illegals are multiplying at several times the rate of the
average productive US citizen.
Simple math proves this will destroy what our ancestors gave their lives for.
Is this such an outrageous argument?
Do they have jobs lined up for them? What about housing and how it's going to be paid for? Just a few questions off the top of my head...and why is the media not hammering home some of these logical questions?
If this comment is true...I believe its already tipped. Time to put it back upright.
RickHeilman Nov 18, 2015 8:48am
I've fought, was nearly killed and came home permanently disabled in the conflicts in the Middle East. Obama just shook the VA funding tree and a sacked it for 2.6 Billion to reallocate to these "refugees." That's funding for health care, rehabilitation, reeducation, housing, food and meager pensions that were stolen from the Veteran's that this country sent to fight the very element you want to do your "feel-good" kumbaya with here in our city. Help your homeland and its valorous wounded first. Your priorities and patriotism are out of alignment with what our real responsibilities are.
The first and foremost duty for our President is the safety and protection of the citizens of the US.
Integrating illegal aliens and refugees into our society does not go in harmony with this duty.
He continues to misuse his position to move forward his personal agenda.
Integrating illegal aliens and refugees into our society does not go in harmony with this duty.
He continues to misuse his position to move forward his personal agenda.
Look at these pictures of the refugees.
Why are there so many healthy young men in these pictures?
How about this:
Allow the women, children and aged.
Allowing no healthy men from the age of 13-59.
If that demographic is not willing to stay back and fight for their own country,
why in the hell would we want them here?
And why in the hell should we send our young men & women over there?
I guess I feel more willing to help those willing to help themselves.
Why are there so many healthy young men in these pictures?
How about this:
Allow the women, children and aged.
Allowing no healthy men from the age of 13-59.
If that demographic is not willing to stay back and fight for their own country,
why in the hell would we want them here?
And why in the hell should we send our young men & women over there?
I guess I feel more willing to help those willing to help themselves.
They have settled a few families but aren't nearly prepared to bring this amount of people in and have adequate security checks done in this short amount of time. It will be costly for taxpayers but that's not really as big of a concern as security when you bring this many people in in 6 weeks
Our new prime minister was a part time drama teacher/trust fund baby so he isn't overly qualified and our left wing government funded media is in love with him.
Similar threads
