Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe this idea has been presented; if so disregard. How about a passing lane added to 130 going up the hill. It would be a multi-use asset, have less impact on the scenic by-way aspect.
This is a great idea, but I'm sure its too easy and involves common sense. I've thought all along why not just wider gravel shoulders? Their half way built now and wouldn't impact the environment nearly as much as a whole parking lot. If its parking just for the snowmobilers, this would be the best scenario, since we have trouble with parking lots[just the Huskers!]
Maybe this idea has been presented; if so disregard. How about a passing lane added to 130 going up the hill. It would be a multi-use asset, have less impact on the scenic by-way aspect.
This is a great idea, but I'm sure its too easy and involves common sense. I've thought all along why not just wider gravel shoulders? Their half way built now and wouldn't impact the environment nearly as much as a whole parking lot. If its parking just for the snowmobilers, this would be the best scenario, since we have trouble with parking lots[just the Huskers!]
That means another roadside trail that you cant get up on to- if it is above the road- which it will with all the snow- I dont think that is good
without refering,,,,which one is it????????????
hog
When it comes to snowmobiles don't expect much from the "opposition" but no votes. At the meeting last week somebody said there is enough room for everybody. Duane Short replied that there is "not enough room for everybody". That pretty much lets you know all you need to about where biodiversity stands. They would like to see sleds gone period. Good luck with that.
Now, that just irritates me. I'm supposedly on the FS list of people to be notified about the parking lot issue, and this is the first I've heard of it. Obviously, living in Cheyenne I don't get the Laramie RumorBang every day, so I didn't know about the meeting.Albany co. commission, biodiversity, and U.S.fs are hosting a "work session" about a parking lot today, open to the public at 10am at the courthouse. Quick notice I know but thats how this crap goes down.
Without knowing who was there, it would be hard to say if they violated the Public Meetings laws. For Wyoming agencies, it's my understanding that there has to be a quorum for it to be considered a "meeting." I think if they have an informational gathering where no decision results, there wouldn't be a violation of public meetings laws. Of course, the FS is probably subject to different rules because it's federal, not state. We'd have to look into it more carefully if anything actually happened, but it's probably just more irritating than anything.Also anyone out there familiar with open meeting laws?
Maybe this idea has been presented; if so disregard. How about a passing lane added to 130 going up the hill. It would be a multi-use asset, have less impact on the scenic by-way aspect. I'm not sure about the costs compared to building a parking lot. My guess would be that it would also be a state and federal project.
OCD's letter idea is something we can do---say a banner advertising a sign-up on a trailer at Greenrock, Albany, and Chains end on a Saturday. Can you imagine how many signatures could be garnered.