Christopher,
I am trying to be patient and understand all the new “features” you have installed. But, even though it’s been active for a while now, I am also confused about this new experience system. I think you are trying to set up a system that gives the users some indication of the value of a member’s posts that can’t be easily manipulated. Is this correct?
If so, I think it still needs a little tweaking. For instance, at the moment:
You have 5512 points (level 17), 1132 posts, 202 thanks, and a 74% activity level.
backcountryislife has 5515 points (level 17), 1341 posts, but only 17 thanks, and a 5% AL.
WFO or go home has 9601 points (level 23), but only 1024 posts, 4 thanks and a 3% AL.
LeftyM77 has 4584 points (level 16), and only 304 posts, 11 thanks, and a 4% AL.
Trav907 has 10133 points (level 24), and only 379 posts, 0 thanks, and 4% AL.
So, there is obviously more to the points system than what is shown publicly (as I know you have posted earlier). But, how are users supposed to know what the values of the rating system actually mean? At first glance, I would assume that a higher number would be better. But, that doesn’t necessarily make sense when you look at the numbers I posted above.
So, how does Trav907 have so many more points than you, even though he has a LOT lower numbers for posts, thanks, and activity? Why is WFO rated higher than backcountry? How do these points relate to the actual value of the content? I guess what I’m asking is, how are users supposed to interpret the new experience system?
Also, correct me if I’m wrong, but there isn’t any user feedback system in place to correct the new points system either. So how are users supposed to identify the troublemakers and antagonists? [example: Snowhawkaddict used to have a VERY poor reputation on this forum, but now he’s listed as a positive contributor at level 25]
I apologize for not understanding what you are trying to accomplish here. Could you please explain?