That it's a 163. Just need to put the boards on it tomorrow and she will be ready to trash!
Shhh don't tell anyone...
- Thread starter Chadly
- Start date
And for anyone that wants to know putting a 163 on a 155 is the biggest waste of money... I feel bad for all the buffalo'd guys who over paid for Experts!
J
Good looking sled! That can looks like a work of art!
Whatcha showin us with the tape there?
U
Are you ok in the head or did your parents drop you on it when you were a baby
I speak Chadly, let me interpret. He is using the tape just as a reference for the back of the track. He says the 155 length tunnel is only 3.5” shorter than a 163 AND since he spent big money on rails and a track and thinks its a waste he is trying to make guys that bought Experts seem dumber than him.
Discuss...
Discuss...
I thought maybe he just put 155 decals on his 163. That would work too for most. lol
I was just showing the difference of over hang. The blue sled is stock 163 and the green is a 155 with 163 rails/track. It's not much different. I still have yet to ride it to see if it's noticeable.
Cats had this short tunnel deal since 09....
Sent it
Sent it
So your telling me going from a 155-163, an eight inch track length (4 inhces of rail length) and from a 7.25 to 8" rear wheel (approx half inch of track reduction) resulted in a total gain of only 3.5"?? Say it aint so!
Polaris isn't that simple.
155 is either a 154.4 or 156.
163 is either a 162 or 163....
Sent it
Im very aware of that, also driver diameter changes based on pitch. Point being, at no point is going from a "155" to a "163" a big change in OAL of skid.
Just chadly getting bored trolling the doo section and coming here to post poorly constructed thoughts and whine about very simple to understand change in lengths.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Just chadly getting bored trolling the doo section and coming here to post poorly constructed thoughts and whine about very simple to understand change in lengths.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
You're an idiot. I am talking about the tunnel. The tunnel is about 3 tenths shorter. I could careless about the track. Drag is drag on the tunnel.
Your not talking about anything, your posting random photos with a tape sorta leaned up by the sled with no explenation, not common reference points. Shorter in OAL of tunnel or ride height? I see the lime squeeze sled has burandt air shocks which would play into reight height if thats what your attempting to show.
If you care to make a point of provide information I'm all about it. But this post is a long way from useful information. The only thing you did manage to get a full thought out on was bashing people who bought expert model ski-doo's. This also has no bearing on this build as aside from shared concept.
Both my 840s are identical set ups minus the tunnel length. One is a 155 and one is a 163. The 55 has a .3' shorter tunnel. That's all I was saying and telling people it's probably not worth the cash to turn a 55 into a 63. And yes I think the Doo Expert is over priced and feel bad for the guys who paid the extra to get one. The Doo 54 has a .4' shorter tunnel than the Doo 65. I paid 14,300 OTD for my Doo 65 and I have heard the expert has been going for over 17,000. Not worth the .4'if you ask me. There you go for useful information. What are you even doing in this thread? Shouldn't you be giving bad advice over in the Doo turbo section???
U
I paid $300 more for my expert then you did so how am I over paying. If yours isn’t the expert then it looks like maybe you should’ve spent $300 more and got the expert
Chadly where are you getting your info/measurements from? You are saying the tunnel on the 155 is only POINT 3 of an inch shorter than a 163? That doesn’t sound right at all. I was thinking 3-4 inches? Same with the doo. Can you measure the tunnel length on both sleds from a fixed point that is the same on both sleds?
Similar threads
