how many of us are willing to run for office? the USA /states needs your help I'm going to run for a seat in the Montana house of rep this coming year but we need more thin just me in Thar to make a change if we can get 10-15 of us in there for each state we can them change it one thing that ill go after is the state rights and that includes the feds lands
runing for office
- Thread starter johnsodo
- Start date
I wish you luck!!! But I hope the miss-spellings are purposeful slang 
I know I wouldn't have the patience for something like that
I know I wouldn't have the patience for something like that
I hope you can be successful as you stated we need real americans running in every district to replace these goons. You are certainly accurate in that the house is the one branch where the the people can have the most leverage as the reps have to run every two years and the district is the smallest to have to cover and campaign. This next election cycle should be an easy one for real conservatives to make inroads if they stick to the issues of big government, deficit spending, illegal immigration and the fallacy of cap and trade. Gonna take a lot of money so I wish you well. Certainly will help as much as I can if you go ahead. Swampy
I'm so selfish that protecting and or expanding (Yeah Right) riding areas are essentially at the top of my priority list for any sitting Politician. What good are low taxes, fiscal responsibility and new oil drilling if I cant ride?
Man thats selfish....Just keeping it real though!
I was all in with you til I got to your sig block.....
I'm thinking the GOP can field a stronger candidate than Sarah and shoot for an actual win rather than another.....Loss?
Good luck Mang! I hear them fvckers get good health care benefits!
Man thats selfish....Just keeping it real though!
I was all in with you til I got to your sig block.....
I'm thinking the GOP can field a stronger candidate than Sarah and shoot for an actual win rather than another.....Loss?
Good luck Mang! I hear them fvckers get good health care benefits!
S
suitcase
Well-known member
I wish you luck, if you are able to do that. I agree we need more people that are willing to go the extra mile and keep things like public access on the fore front on topics, along with taxes, health care, so on and so on. Not all of us are cut out for that, myself I can't play to much of the politics with the libs, I would choke someone. Go for it!!!
I'd like to see someone who supports rooting out corruption, like Beck and Palin, but it can't be either of them. They are way too polarizing.
The one reason I've always liked Palin is she called out the corruption in Alaska in her own party. She didn't pick on opposing parties. Of course this is why the republicans let her crash and burn with all the media attacks.
I'm thinking the GOP can field a stronger candidate than Sarah and shoot for an actual win rather than another.....Loss?
Going to have to agree to disagreeI guess. There is no stronger conservative candidate than Sarah. If she had not been on the ticket Macain would have gone down in flames with a loss greater than George Mcgovern. When she was picked they immediatelly caught up with OB in the polling, than dip**** jumped headlong into the bailout mode and even recomended they drop the first debate while OB was smart and evaded the issue. No political canditate has been through and continue to go through continual examination into every minute detail of her and her familys life including lies, inuendos and libelous statements. There is only one reason the left and the media are attacking her to the degree they are and that is she scares the hell out of them more than any other potential candidate.Swampy
Going to have to agree to disagreeI guess. There is no stronger conservative candidate than Sarah. If she had not been on the ticket Macain would have gone down in flames with a loss greater than George Mcgovern. When she was picked they immediatelly caught up with OB in the polling, than dip**** jumped headlong into the bailout mode and even recomended they drop the first debate while OB was smart and evaded the issue. No political canditate has been through and continue to go through continual examination into every minute detail of her and her familys life including lies, inuendos and libelous statements. There is only one reason the left and the media are attacking her to the degree they are and that is she scares the hell out of them more than any other potential candidate.Swampy
Sarah Palin would be destroyed in the primary debates by the Romneys, Pawlentys and Huckabees of the party.
She would be torn to shreds by career politicians who would certainly be more aggressive than to question what she reads or why she assumes that she has foreign policy smarts cuz' Alaska is so close to Russia.
Those dudes would be ruthless.
She quit her job and had a ghostwriter write a book that may not be factually correct.
She simply dosent have the education or "Political Smarts" of the career guys.
Those dudes would go after her and make her constant complaints about the media look tame and Kindergardenish in comparision.....
Romney is a beast. Sarah would be better served doing a talk show, AM radio or more facebooking than to try and match wits with that dude in a primary debate. Nothing personal....Just the way it is.
Her current polling numbers would drop like a rock after the nasty campaign monsters had there way with her.....
The far right dosent equate to 50+1.
Lose the center? Lose the indepents by being Uber Polarizing? Hand the white house right back to Barack Obama.
She would be torn to shreds by career politicians who would certainly be more aggressive than to question what she reads or why she assumes that she has foreign policy smarts cuz' Alaska is so close to Russia.
Those dudes would be ruthless.
She quit her job and had a ghostwriter write a book that may not be factually correct.
She simply dosent have the education or "Political Smarts" of the career guys.
Those dudes would go after her and make her constant complaints about the media look tame and Kindergardenish in comparision.....
Romney is a beast. Sarah would be better served doing a talk show, AM radio or more facebooking than to try and match wits with that dude in a primary debate. Nothing personal....Just the way it is.
Her current polling numbers would drop like a rock after the nasty campaign monsters had there way with her.....
The far right dosent equate to 50+1.
Lose the center? Lose the indepents by being Uber Polarizing? Hand the white house right back to Barack Obama.
Last edited:
"I'm going to run for a seat in the Montana house of rep this coming year "
yes im going to run
Thanks for validating my point!Swampy
There is only one reason the left and the media are attacking her to the degree they are and that is she scares the hell out of them more than any other potential candidate.Swampy
There is only one reason the left and the media are attacking her to the degree they are and that is she scares the hell out of them more than any other potential candidate.Swampy
Yah she scares the media! We would at least like to have a leader that doesn't need to use "soccer mom" phrasing to communicate with people. America doesn't need a soccer mom....
Though it is true that Sarah cleaned up Alaska, that place is so fricken dirty it would be hard not to..
One thing I do like though is withholding govt funds to electric utilities until they perform some integrated resource planning as a complete system. That will make a big big change for the Alaskan electric utilities.
Alaska is an interesting place. For a state that seems to be so conservative, they have no problem having a windfall tax on the oil companies (something every single conservative was against for doing federally) and give it to all the residents. I don't know.. take from the rich, give to the poor.. kind of sounds a little commie to me.. ha ha.
Though it is true that Sarah cleaned up Alaska, that place is so fricken dirty it would be hard not to..
One thing I do like though is withholding govt funds to electric utilities until they perform some integrated resource planning as a complete system. That will make a big big change for the Alaskan electric utilities.
Alaska is an interesting place. For a state that seems to be so conservative, they have no problem having a windfall tax on the oil companies (something every single conservative was against for doing federally) and give it to all the residents. I don't know.. take from the rich, give to the poor.. kind of sounds a little commie to me.. ha ha.
Yah she scares the media! We would at least like to have a leader that doesn't need to use "soccer mom" phrasing to communicate with people. America doesn't need a soccer mom....Ruffy
So you would rather stick with inside the beltway candidates from the Rockefeller, Kissenger, bryzinsky, Nixon, skull and bones wing of the parties who have ruined this country. The definition of crazy is doing the same thing every time and expecting a different outcome.
Alaska is an interesting place. For a state that seems to be so conservative, they have no problem having a windfall tax on the oil companies (something every single conservative was against for doing federally) and give it to all the residents. I don't know.. take from the rich, give to the poor.. kind of sounds a little commie to me.. ha ha. Ruffy
Actually the states have the right to the mineral rights within their land and the right to charge for access across their land, at least they distribute the funds to the state citizens. And I bet the oil companies enjoy dealing with the state more than the federal government. Swampy
So you would rather stick with inside the beltway candidates from the Rockefeller, Kissenger, bryzinsky, Nixon, skull and bones wing of the parties who have ruined this country. The definition of crazy is doing the same thing every time and expecting a different outcome.
Alaska is an interesting place. For a state that seems to be so conservative, they have no problem having a windfall tax on the oil companies (something every single conservative was against for doing federally) and give it to all the residents. I don't know.. take from the rich, give to the poor.. kind of sounds a little commie to me.. ha ha. Ruffy
Actually the states have the right to the mineral rights within their land and the right to charge for access across their land, at least they distribute the funds to the state citizens. And I bet the oil companies enjoy dealing with the state more than the federal government. Swampy
Yah, but yet the republicans are toting the same line as always?
Your examples are the other side of the spectrum... I don't want nepotism.. and I don't want average joe either. I want Mr. Smith... Though I would settle for a population that is willing to take the time and effort to analyze the world around them, and make decisions of voting without using their emotions..we aren't talking about the same thing here swampy. I am talking about "windfall" taxes.Actually the states have the right to the mineral rights within their land and the right to charge for access across their land, at least they distribute the funds to the state citizens. And I bet the oil companies enjoy dealing with the state more than the federal government. Swampy
seattle times article on alaskan oil taxes
They did EXACTLY what all the republicans in the lower 48 were against... Note date of article is last year and some change...
Yah, but yet the republicans are toting the same line as always? Your examples are the other side of the spectrum... I don't want nepotism.. and I don't want average joe either. I want Mr. Smith... Though I would settle for a population that is willing to take the time and effort to analyze the world around them, and make decisions of voting without using their emotions..Ruffy
I would only add both parties are in the same line, just 2 groups with a different timeline for total control! We don't need a movie running the world but I would sugest Palin comes closer to Mr. Smith than all of those good ol boys who have been running the show for decades, except of course Ron Paul.
we aren't talking about the same thing here swampy. I am talking about "windfall" taxes. Ruffy
Won't argue the point without further research. Swampy
Again may you have the merriest Christmass
I would only add both parties are in the same line, just 2 groups with a different timeline for total control! We don't need a movie running the world but I would sugest Palin comes closer to Mr. Smith than all of those good ol boys who have been running the show for decades, except of course Ron Paul.
we aren't talking about the same thing here swampy. I am talking about "windfall" taxes. Ruffy
Won't argue the point without further research. Swampy
Again may you have the merriest Christmass
I would only add both parties are in the same line said:
Won't argue the point without further research. Swampy
Just read the link....
I would vote for T-Paw, he didn't do to bad by me in MN....not the best but not bad at all.
I used to think i wanted to run for office....now I realize I'm un-electable. I ride dirt bike, sled, hunt, drink, believe that maybe we shouldn't just drill here, use re-usable gracery bags, firm believer in the right to bear arms (mind you I don't own any), don't believe in the death penalty and am very sympathetic to the homeless, beggars, drug addicts, single moms in the ghetto, etc. Believe tradional light bulbs and poor fuel efficency is stupid and anything we can do to help it is good.
It seems my views would cancel out either party voting for me....so until our ways change I'm sticking to non-running.
ignore the typos, I'm drinking my breakfast/dinner.
I used to think i wanted to run for office....now I realize I'm un-electable. I ride dirt bike, sled, hunt, drink, believe that maybe we shouldn't just drill here, use re-usable gracery bags, firm believer in the right to bear arms (mind you I don't own any), don't believe in the death penalty and am very sympathetic to the homeless, beggars, drug addicts, single moms in the ghetto, etc. Believe tradional light bulbs and poor fuel efficency is stupid and anything we can do to help it is good.
It seems my views would cancel out either party voting for me....so until our ways change I'm sticking to non-running.
ignore the typos, I'm drinking my breakfast/dinner.
funny!
Similar threads
