Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Pro Rmk vs Rmk Assult

You would have to dissassemble the chassis completely to install that cooler... pretty pricey.


Next alternative would be the FTX add on cooler in the rear, but then you don't get the benefit of clearing ice at the front of the tunnel/bulkhead.



.
 
ll will using it in the mnts about 25 days a yr, rest back here in mn, ditch bangin 90%-10% trails

sled tour is here april 5-6 makin my decision then
 
Does anybody know if the factory WE shocks off a pro rmk would fit on the standard rmk? Since those shocks are relatively cheap in the swapmeet section and not that bad of a shock IMO maybe they would be an option. Just trying to get some more options for people thinking about buying a standard. If I'm not careful I might talk myself into trading my assault for a new standard :face-icon-small-sho since I'm interested in a new sled anyway. I should quit thinking, it would make my life a lot less stressful.
 
Last edited:
I had an 09 Assault in between dragon rmks. i got it for the same reasons you are thinking. i only kept it one year as i hated it. to me, the wider ski stance is a HUGE minus! 3 inches wider makes it much harder to "flick" in the pow. it definately doesn't want to lay over very well. my two cents...
 
not to worried about the ski stance, my m1100t is at 41"
the not a big deal either, cat only has a front cooler for 14'

biggest concern was more the QD, buddy has a 13' pro and popped a belt
jumping a two ft wide creek in the Big Horn a few weeks ago, we both know he cased it hard on the bank. would just be another expensive belt to carry around
 
MH, My local polaris mechanic seems to think that keeping the WE clickers in front and switching assault to rmk arms wont be a big deal, i belive even in worst case it is, we can have them shimmed.
exactly how much lower well the skis/arms sit with WE clickers and pro RMK arms in front?

if i rember correctly some aftermarket arms makers do make standard width arms to fit the WE shocks, there are options to this reguardless.

i love my WE clickers, but ill be damned if i even begin to love my widestance, it just sucks in my opinion, and half way through a day of tree riding im paying for in trying to keep up when im usually in better shape than those im riding with.
 
MH, My local polaris mechanic seems to think that keeping the WE clickers in front and switching assault to rmk arms wont be a big deal, i belive even in worst case it is, we can have them shimmed.
exactly how much lower well the skis/arms sit with WE clickers and pro RMK arms in front?

if i rember correctly some aftermarket arms makers do make standard width arms to fit the WE shocks, there are options to this reguardless.

i love my WE clickers, but ill be damned if i even begin to love my widestance, it just sucks in my opinion, and half way through a day of tree riding im paying for in trying to keep up when im usually in better shape than those im riding with.

I'm in the same boat. I rode a pro rmk on our last trip for an hour and fell in love. With that being said I'm going in tomorrow to buy a 2013 pro.
 
Lordus... If you are talking the 2013 PRO RMK arms... almost 2"... too much for shimming IMO.

Pevious years... about an inch.
 
These guys covered everything. We rode today in Upper Michigan with both sleds (2013's) switching back and forth. The RMK track is best for most conditions. The Comp track is awesome in the right conditions but trenches to much for most riders. I love the Comp track for RMSHA, but my everyday sled would have the RMK track.
 
I went with the 13 Assault. Reasons I did is...

-Shocks. Friends I've talked to said that's what they've decided to change out on their rides first, or liked better about others sleds they've tried. Many places we ride, we have to cover some trail, many times not groomed well or post days traffic. Also when have you been the first person up Blue Creek on way to Jefferson? or(Insert your spot here?) Sometimes, but not usual, and when your not the first, what size are the moguls with a 3,4,5+ ft base after a group folks busted it ahead of you an hour/day/s ago?

I also didn't want to have to try sell leftover shocks next time I buy, and you don't get anything for them on trade-in/resale, that's just me.

-Durability of chain case. I like the idea of the quick drive, and think it is or will be reliable, I just suck at jacking the throttle on landings every now and then in said moguls above, or what drops or jumps I may attempt. I need the added durability there to make up for my lack of performance. I don't live in the mountains, so down time for broken stuff sucks and burns up vacation time.Trying to minimize those possibilities as best I can in my mind. If I lived out west, I would reconsider this more seriously, or will with future purchases maybe.

-Welded A-arms for durability, see two comments above.

-Ski width I've left in the narrowest position, and haven't had it in more than 1 ft powder on top of good base. At 6'3" 210# no problem rolling it over. Never ridden a Pro, probably would be easier when compared, but this still seems easy and fun. Looking forward to next year to put it through it's paces and see. I'm coming from a Edge chassis also fwiw.

-Got the Comp track on it as I didn't have a choice, has been a blast here this late season snow and on trail. I'm looking to get a 5.1 to put on it for next years mid season powder.

-Like the option of suspension mounting positions, options are good.

-Mine came with 4 extra bogies, considered putting them on for break in here in MN, not any more after riding some. Need scratchers like was said previously to keep eng temps down on any groomed/hardpack trails, they work great. Even with extra bogies, you'd still need scratchers to keep engine cool, and since you have to use scratchers in those cases anyway, that negates the need for the front cooler, except for maybe ice build up like MH said, but I'm not as concerned about that as others may be. I can't tell a 5-10 lb weight difference personally. Maybe I'll feel different after getting out in the deep someday?

-I do miss the sway bar on the trail, don't in the powder, your preference there.

I do like the argument of going with a standard RMK, and upgrading shocks. I like Pro-Tapers for my body type so I would miss or change to those maybe, but other than that the Standard RMK add premium shocks covers most of my amature concerns. If I were snow checking, I would seriously be looking into that myself.
 
Another option if you want an Assault WITH a front cooler - Switchback Assault has a front cooler, and you could swap out the 144 torsion bar skid with an aftermarket or take off, extend it, etc. You may have to swap out the front overstructure if you want vertical steering of the RMK, looks like they are different per part numbers. It does have the Pro Tapers, cyclone MC, and the cowling looks like the RMK, not the Rush. Never seen one up close. Just another Assault option with factory front cooler and other Assault goodies.
 
I wasn't aware the SBA had a different steering post angle than the RMK and RMK Assault?
 
So what's more cost effective/ end up with a better machine/ best result?

Narrow set of arms and 2 new adjustable shocks on an rmk assault
Or
Set of 4 adjustable shocks on a pro rmk
 
good read. i understand the 13 pros felt stronger than the last years. are the jugs/pipe/heads/timing/fuel requirements ect, ect, the same on rmk vs. pro?
 
RMK IMO.

So what's more cost effective/ end up with a better machine/ best result?


Narrow set of arms and 2 new adjustable shocks on an rmk assault
Or
Set of 4 adjustable shocks on a pro rmk

Cost effective... Get the NON PRO-RMK (Aka Std. RMK)... and upgrade the shocks... for the reasons above... The standard has the same engine, clutches, running boards, suspension, track as the PRO model...and has stronger welded A-arms... Weight penalty is minor when you factor out the bogie wheels and the fact that there is no weight gain from the slab that builds up on the front of the tunnel because there is an additional heat-exchanger on the Non-PRO.




.
 
Last edited:


Cost effective... Get the NON PRO-RMK (Aka Std. RMK)... and upgrade the shocks... for the reasons above... The standard has the same engine, clutches, running boards, suspension, track as the PRO model...and has stronger welded A-arms... Weight penalty is minor when you factor out the bogie wheels and the fact that there is no weight gain from the slab that builds up on the front of the tunnel because there is an additional heat-exchanger on the Non-PRO.



.


hard to argue that logic :face-icon-small-coo
except the standard doesnt have the QD (right?)
 
Premium Features



Back
Top