Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If I was head of F&G I would tell Joe landowner, Hey we had a season back in November and you would not allow anyone to hunt these creatures without paying a fee. Therefore you can wait till the next season to have the problem taken care of.
Time to stir the pot some more. There are a lot of good points on both sides of this arguement. One thing that does piss me off is CRP paid hunting. As far as I'm concerned, if someones land is in CRP they should have NO right to charge to hunt it. They have the right to post and know who's on the land, but NO paid huniting. The tax payers are paying the landowner to keep that land inactive.JMO
Ok, now flame away.
I Think if that were to happen youd see alot more landowners poisoning/shooting them themselves and letting them rot where they lay. If I were the farmer and the Govt wants to tell me what I can and can't do on my land. How hard would it be to put out a mineral lick or corn with decon. That's how I would piss on their parade. Kinda like the ranchers are doing right now in North Western SD in their dispute with GFP and the Govt Hunters for predator control.
This would open a new can o worms.
Traditionally, hunting rights stay with landowner.
Your scenario would imply landowner relinquishes some rights to renter.
Furthermore, CRP payments are no longer competitive with cash rent in this
area. Therefore, I believe we will see fewer & fewer acres of CRP the way it is.
Your proposal would make it even less appealing to put land into CRP.
I agree that hunting is becoming a "rich mans game". That sucks!
Since there are and will be fewer & fewer people who can financially justify
hunting,
those remaining absolutely have to support the NRA. I see troubles for the NRA
in the future, with smaller % of citizens who pasionately fighting to retain
their 2nd ammendment rights.
Lastly,
PCDOC, has gotten an undeserving black eye in this debate. We are all entightled
to our opinion, and he got jumped on pretty hard for voicing his. I bet we even
helped him see the landowner side of things.!
2 sides to everything
Fosgate,
You sound like someone we would be more that willing to let hunt our land. If you ever want someplace to hunt, you let me know sir. We generally don't spend much time hunting because of livestock like I mentioned before, and try to save our stuff for friends and family. The people we won't let hunt are like PCDOC who think they have a God given right to hunt whoevers' land they want to. The only people we allow to hunt are friends, familly, and land lords. QUOTE]
here we go redneck ( I think your name says it all - I can hear the theme from Deliverance playing) I never said I had the right to hunt any land I saw. I completely respect the landowners right to post and select who hunts and who does not. You clearly stated you don't like being bothered with hunters asking so you tell them no. That is fine.
I don't hunt on posted land, leave gates open, litter or do anything else to piss landowner off. I just don't like the idea of being charged to hunt...........that's it. One fricken opinion and I get a$$raped WOW
Boy that sure would be the smart thing to do. Don't you think that the livestock would get to the mineral or salt licks. I can see the landowner now out training all his cows, " Now this is a good one and this is a bad one. Don't lick the bad one Bossy" The sight of that makes me laugh. Not only that but there are laws about the landowner killing game. As far as the post about charging fees for hunting on CRP, I never thought about it but I agree, if the govt. is paying to keep it idle then you should not charge to hunt on it, or the govt. gets the fees for hunting that land. Farmers and ranchers are the first ones to tell you they want the govt. to stay the heck away from them and don't tell me what to do with my land but most of them are involved in every cash payment program from the govt. that they can get signed up for. my brother in law who farms and ranches in SD once told me that the farmer rancher are the biggest welfare recipiants in the country. I beleive him