I was thinking along the lines of "When is a conservative NOT right?" lol..
Good stuff though..
More racist remarks from BHO who fans flames of racial hatred at NAACP
- Thread starter blue fluff
- Start date
I was thinking along the lines of "When is a conservative NOT right?" lol..
Good stuff though..
Racism is definately alive and well in the US, black against hispanic and visa versa, black against asian and visa versa, white against each and visa versa but white America has done more to elimlnate racism than any race or country in the world you will never eliminate all racisim. Also most black crime is against blacks so the problem is not racisim it is criminals, thugs and gangsters of all persuasion yet this clown who knows better screams the racism card for one reason, to fire the passions of everyone and try and justify his cushy job, there was no racism practiced at this confrontation except from the aresstee. But than what can you expect from the enlightened of the higher education professors. There is a reason these problems occur as racism and marxism is rampant within our major colleges, especially the Ivy League schools and the communist program is to create race issues to divide the segments of the US for the purpose of destroying America.
Some info on the subject:
The social revolution cannot come about except in the form of an epoch of proletarian civil war against the bourgeoisie in the advanced countries combined with a whole series of democratic and revolutionary movements, including movements for national liberation, in the undeveloped, backward and oppressed nations.5
Lenin tells us: "The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states and end all national isolation; not only to bring the nations closer together, but to merge them. . . "6 (italics added)
Only now has it become obvious that the liberation of the oppressed nationalities is inconceivable without breaking with imperialism, without overthrowing the bourgeoisie of the oppressed nations, without power passing into the hands of the toiling masses of those nationalitie
For more than a decade after the Russian revolution, the comrades floundered on the subject of the "Negro problem" in the United States. They discussed it, they studied it, but they were absolutely unable to form a revolutionary theory to guide the activities of their American members. And comrades were complaining that these ungrateful American Negroes simply didn't go for communism.
Now what did "self-determination for the Negroes in the Black Belt" actually mean? One of the earliest, if not the earliest, explanations, and certainly the most official, was offered by "John Pepper," who as Joseph Pogany had been a general in the Communist regime in post-World War I Hungary, and was at the time he wrote an official representative of the comintern in the United States. "The 'black belt' of the south . . . constitutes virtually a colony within the body of the United States of America," Pepper tells us soon after the sixth world congress.(10) And therefore:
The Negro Communists should emphasize in their propaganda the establishment of a Negro Soviet Republic.
The Workers [Communist] Party of America puts forward correctly as its central slogan: Abolition of the whole system of race discrimination. Full racial, social and political equality for the Negro people. But it is necessary to supplement the struggle for the full racial, social and political equality of the Negroes with a struggle for their right of national self-determination. Self-determination means the right to establish their own state, to erect their own government, if thAt the plenary meeting of the national committee of the Communist party in 1946, William Z. Foster complained:
One of the major difficulties we have had to contend with has been a tendency of our opponents to pose one of these currents to the other, thus making it appear that the demand for self-determination slogans is in contradiction to the proposition that Negroes fight for the fullest rights as Americans. Comrade Strong knocked this nonsense on the head when he pointed out so forcefully that it is impossible for the Negro people to achieve their full economic, political, and social equality as Americans unless they organize as a nation, unless they forward the slogan of self-determination for the Black Belt of the South.(22) (italics)
The point I wish to make is that the development of the American Negroes in the Black Belt into a full-fledged nation in the classical sense is a basic requirement for the progressive [that is, socialist-communist] development of the United States. . .It means as a result of this struggle the unfolding of the most fundamental and the most profound struggles for democracy in the United States, anti-imperialist struggles leading to socialism.(27)
In 1963 Jack Lotto reported on the closed convention of the Socialist Workers party:
Attending the sessions of this Marxist-Leninist party as delegates and guests were members of the Muslims. The Muslim members participated in the SWP discussions on resolutions on Negro activities, which called for closer SWP orientation toward the Muslim movement .... (32)
It has been very clear that the race relation programs have been the focus of the communist party and being used to destroy capitalism and replace it with socialism, followed by full blown communism. Divide and conquer unfortunatelly most people and allmost all of our leaders have refused to learn the issue and work to end this marxist influence that is pitting american against american, most Americans are not violantly racists and are more than happy to live under the ideal that every American has unailenable rights to life, liberty and property, the problem the PC government and education is trying to force their interpretation of rights on the American people. Swampy
O
Ollie
ACCOUNT CLOSED
Usually means the same thing.
Avoidance is an instinct bred into everyone regardless of what they believe.
Hows that for an honest answer.
^^^ Very Honest ..... and true.
Hmmmm, 911 tapes revealed from the "racist" caller on Gates Gate.
==========
911 OPERATOR: All right, tell me exactly what happened?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Um, I don't know what's happening. I just had an older woman standing here and she had noticed two gentlemen trying to get in a house at that number, 17 Ware Street. And they kind of had to barge in and they broke the screen door and they finally got in. When I had looked, I went further, closer to the house a little bit after the gentlemen were already in the house. I noticed two suitcases. So, I'm not sure if this is two individuals who actually work there, I mean, who live there.
911 OPERATOR: You think they might have been breaking in?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: I don't know 'cause I have no idea. I just noticed.
911 OPERATOR: So you're saying you think the possibility might have been there? What do you mean by barged in? You mean they kicked the door in?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: No, they were pushing the door in. Like, umm, the screen part of the front door was kind of like cut.
911 OPERATOR: How did they open the door itself with the lock?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: They, I didn't see a key or anything 'cause I was a little bit away from the door. But I did notice that they pushed their (interrupted).
911 OPERATOR: And what do the suitcases have to do with anything?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: I don't know, I'm just saying that's what I saw.
911 OPERATOR: Do you know what apartment they broke into?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: No, they're just they first floor. I don't even think that it's an apartment. It's 17 Ware Street. It's a house, it's a yellow house. Number 17. I don't know if they live there and they just had a hard time with their key but I did notice that they kind of used their shoulder to kind of barge in and they got in. I don't know if they had a key or not because I couldn't see from my angle. But, you know, when I looked a little closely that's what I saw.
911 OPERATOR: (inaudible) guy or Hispanic?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Umm.
911 OPERATOR: Are they still in the house?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: They're still in the house, I believe, yeah.
911 OPERATOR: Were they white, black or Hispanic?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Umm, well there were two larger men, one looked kind of Hispanic but I'm not really sure. And the other one entered and I didn't see what he looked like at all. I just saw it from a distance and this older woman was worried thinking someone's breaking in someone's house, they've been barging in. And she interrupted me and that's when I had noticed otherwise I probably wouldn't have noticed it at all, to be honest with you. So, I was just calling 'cause she was a concerned neighbor, I guess.
911 OPERATOR: OK, are you standing outside?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: I'm standing outside, yes.
911 OPERATOR: All right, the police are on the way, you can meet them then they get there. What's your name?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Yeah, my name is (deleted).
911 OPERATOR: All right, we're on the way.
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Ok. All right, I guess I'll wait. Thanks.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/27/raw-data-transcript-cambridge/
==========
911 OPERATOR: All right, tell me exactly what happened?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Um, I don't know what's happening. I just had an older woman standing here and she had noticed two gentlemen trying to get in a house at that number, 17 Ware Street. And they kind of had to barge in and they broke the screen door and they finally got in. When I had looked, I went further, closer to the house a little bit after the gentlemen were already in the house. I noticed two suitcases. So, I'm not sure if this is two individuals who actually work there, I mean, who live there.
911 OPERATOR: You think they might have been breaking in?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: I don't know 'cause I have no idea. I just noticed.
911 OPERATOR: So you're saying you think the possibility might have been there? What do you mean by barged in? You mean they kicked the door in?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: No, they were pushing the door in. Like, umm, the screen part of the front door was kind of like cut.
911 OPERATOR: How did they open the door itself with the lock?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: They, I didn't see a key or anything 'cause I was a little bit away from the door. But I did notice that they pushed their (interrupted).
911 OPERATOR: And what do the suitcases have to do with anything?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: I don't know, I'm just saying that's what I saw.
911 OPERATOR: Do you know what apartment they broke into?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: No, they're just they first floor. I don't even think that it's an apartment. It's 17 Ware Street. It's a house, it's a yellow house. Number 17. I don't know if they live there and they just had a hard time with their key but I did notice that they kind of used their shoulder to kind of barge in and they got in. I don't know if they had a key or not because I couldn't see from my angle. But, you know, when I looked a little closely that's what I saw.
911 OPERATOR: (inaudible) guy or Hispanic?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Umm.
911 OPERATOR: Are they still in the house?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: They're still in the house, I believe, yeah.
911 OPERATOR: Were they white, black or Hispanic?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Umm, well there were two larger men, one looked kind of Hispanic but I'm not really sure. And the other one entered and I didn't see what he looked like at all. I just saw it from a distance and this older woman was worried thinking someone's breaking in someone's house, they've been barging in. And she interrupted me and that's when I had noticed otherwise I probably wouldn't have noticed it at all, to be honest with you. So, I was just calling 'cause she was a concerned neighbor, I guess.
911 OPERATOR: OK, are you standing outside?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: I'm standing outside, yes.
911 OPERATOR: All right, the police are on the way, you can meet them then they get there. What's your name?
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Yeah, my name is (deleted).
911 OPERATOR: All right, we're on the way.
FEMALE WITNESS CALLER: Ok. All right, I guess I'll wait. Thanks.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/27/raw-data-transcript-cambridge/
House GOP drafts resolution demanding Obama apologize to Crowley. It'll never happen, but it's a nice idea.
======
July 24, 2009
House to consider resolution demanding Obama apologize to Crowley
@ 10:39 pm by Michael O'Brien
Congress would demand that President Obama apologize to the officer the president said had "acted stupidly" in the arrest of a prominent Harvard professor under a resolution set to be introduced by one Michigan lawmaker.
Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.) will introduce a House resolution on Monday demanding Obama retract and apologize for remarks he has made about Cambridge Police Sergeant James Crowley this past week.
Obama had said at his prime time press conference Wednesday that Crowley had "acted stupidly" in the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, a racially-infused case which has sparked a national debate on race and policing.
The president refused to back down on his involvement in the case, but appeared in the White House briefing on Friday to say he had called Crowley to explain that never meant to insult the officer. (Obama also called Gates on Friday.)
McCotter's resolution would demand Obama "retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley for having unfairly impugned and prejudged his professional conduct in this local police response incident."
The resolution will come after an escalation in the Cambridge case the past two days after the president's initial statements on the matter. The nation's largest police group, the Fraternal Order of Police, blasted Obama for his remarks about Crowley and the Cambridge police.
DRAFT
House Resolution
Whereas on July 16, 2009, Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley responded to a 911 call from a neighbor of Harvard University Professor Henry Louis ("Skip") Gates, Jr. about a suspected break-in in progress at his residence, which had been broken into on a prior occasion;
Whereas on July 22, 2009, in responding to a question during a White House press conference President Barack Obama stated: "Skip Gates is a friend, so I may be a little biased here. I don't know all of the facts involved in this local police response incident";
Whereas President Obama proceeded to state Sergeant Crowley "acted stupidly" for arresting Professor Gates on charges of disorderly conduct;
Whereas, as a former Constitutional Law Professor, President Obama well understands that all Americans are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and their actions should not be prejudged prior to being fully and fairly judged by an appropriate and objective authority after due process;
Whereas, President Obama's nationally televised remarks may likely detrimentally influence the full and fair judgment by an appropriate and objective authority after due process regarding this local police response incident and, thereby, impair Sergeant Crowley's legal and professional standing in relation to said incident; and
Whereas, President Obama appeared at a daily White House Press briefing on July 24, 2009 to address his denouncement of Sergeant Crowley and stated: "I could have calibrated those words differently" but "I continue to believe, based on what I have heard, that there was an overreaction in pulling Professor Gates out of his home to the station."
Whereas, President Obama's refusal to retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Sergeant Crowley and, instead, reiterate his accusation impugning Sergeant Crowley's professional conduct in the performance of his duties;
Now therefore be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives–
Calls upon President Obama to retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley for having unfairly impugned and prejudged his professional conduct in this local police response incident.
http://briefingroom.thehill.com/200...olution-demanding-obama-apologize-to-crowley/
======
July 24, 2009
House to consider resolution demanding Obama apologize to Crowley
@ 10:39 pm by Michael O'Brien
Congress would demand that President Obama apologize to the officer the president said had "acted stupidly" in the arrest of a prominent Harvard professor under a resolution set to be introduced by one Michigan lawmaker.
Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.) will introduce a House resolution on Monday demanding Obama retract and apologize for remarks he has made about Cambridge Police Sergeant James Crowley this past week.
Obama had said at his prime time press conference Wednesday that Crowley had "acted stupidly" in the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, a racially-infused case which has sparked a national debate on race and policing.
The president refused to back down on his involvement in the case, but appeared in the White House briefing on Friday to say he had called Crowley to explain that never meant to insult the officer. (Obama also called Gates on Friday.)
McCotter's resolution would demand Obama "retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley for having unfairly impugned and prejudged his professional conduct in this local police response incident."
The resolution will come after an escalation in the Cambridge case the past two days after the president's initial statements on the matter. The nation's largest police group, the Fraternal Order of Police, blasted Obama for his remarks about Crowley and the Cambridge police.
DRAFT
House Resolution
Whereas on July 16, 2009, Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley responded to a 911 call from a neighbor of Harvard University Professor Henry Louis ("Skip") Gates, Jr. about a suspected break-in in progress at his residence, which had been broken into on a prior occasion;
Whereas on July 22, 2009, in responding to a question during a White House press conference President Barack Obama stated: "Skip Gates is a friend, so I may be a little biased here. I don't know all of the facts involved in this local police response incident";
Whereas President Obama proceeded to state Sergeant Crowley "acted stupidly" for arresting Professor Gates on charges of disorderly conduct;
Whereas, as a former Constitutional Law Professor, President Obama well understands that all Americans are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and their actions should not be prejudged prior to being fully and fairly judged by an appropriate and objective authority after due process;
Whereas, President Obama's nationally televised remarks may likely detrimentally influence the full and fair judgment by an appropriate and objective authority after due process regarding this local police response incident and, thereby, impair Sergeant Crowley's legal and professional standing in relation to said incident; and
Whereas, President Obama appeared at a daily White House Press briefing on July 24, 2009 to address his denouncement of Sergeant Crowley and stated: "I could have calibrated those words differently" but "I continue to believe, based on what I have heard, that there was an overreaction in pulling Professor Gates out of his home to the station."
Whereas, President Obama's refusal to retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Sergeant Crowley and, instead, reiterate his accusation impugning Sergeant Crowley's professional conduct in the performance of his duties;
Now therefore be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives–
Calls upon President Obama to retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley for having unfairly impugned and prejudged his professional conduct in this local police response incident.
http://briefingroom.thehill.com/200...olution-demanding-obama-apologize-to-crowley/
This guy, Lloyd Marcus, is a black conservative, singer/songwriter, artist, and president of National Association for the Advancement of Conservative People of Color.
He was raised in the ghetto and "After college, I became a Graphic Designer. I landed a job at an ABC affiliate TV station, and was later promoted to supervisor and enjoyed a successful award-winning career."
He tells a very poignant story about a couple of his best friends (also black), their lives and jobs together, the different mentalities they had about race and the end results. I really enjoy this man's perspectives on things and this article is a worthy read about black entitlement mentality and the results.
=============
"In my youth, I lived a wild and crazy life; drugs, women and partying, basically 24/7. Scholarships permitted me to attend art college where I hung with hippies. While the hippies preached peace and love, most were extremely angry at America.
There I was, a black student from the ghetto of east Baltimore, who could not figure out what these spoiled white kids from well to do families were so p-o-ed about. However, their philosophy was free love and drugs. So, I said, "Right on!"...
I was sadden and stunned by the large number of young black men in prison. Many were bright and gifted in many areas. Yes, they had "issues". Catastrophically, their biggest problem was their negative attitudes and beliefs about America. Black America's victim mindset and negative view of their country are great contributors to their inability to fit comfortably into society.
While race profiteers are not totally responsible, I believe we all choose what we want to believe, and they have misled many into a belief that limits and hurts them in the long run.
I give you this tale from my youth."...
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/race_profiteers_are_the_true_e.html
He was raised in the ghetto and "After college, I became a Graphic Designer. I landed a job at an ABC affiliate TV station, and was later promoted to supervisor and enjoyed a successful award-winning career."
He tells a very poignant story about a couple of his best friends (also black), their lives and jobs together, the different mentalities they had about race and the end results. I really enjoy this man's perspectives on things and this article is a worthy read about black entitlement mentality and the results.
=============
"In my youth, I lived a wild and crazy life; drugs, women and partying, basically 24/7. Scholarships permitted me to attend art college where I hung with hippies. While the hippies preached peace and love, most were extremely angry at America.
There I was, a black student from the ghetto of east Baltimore, who could not figure out what these spoiled white kids from well to do families were so p-o-ed about. However, their philosophy was free love and drugs. So, I said, "Right on!"...
I was sadden and stunned by the large number of young black men in prison. Many were bright and gifted in many areas. Yes, they had "issues". Catastrophically, their biggest problem was their negative attitudes and beliefs about America. Black America's victim mindset and negative view of their country are great contributors to their inability to fit comfortably into society.
While race profiteers are not totally responsible, I believe we all choose what we want to believe, and they have misled many into a belief that limits and hurts them in the long run.
I give you this tale from my youth."...
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/race_profiteers_are_the_true_e.html
From Rush, LOL! SEIU is the union that has its tentacles throughout the Obama Admin and ACORN. They beat up this black conservative, but does BO say they acted stupidly?
=======
Did SEIU Act "Stupidly" in Beating of Black Conservative in St. Louis?
August 7, 2009
"The St. Louis Tea Party will hold a press conference and peaceable protest at [Service Employee International Union] Headquarters [in St. Louis] at Noon Saturday... The protest is to demand justice for Kenneth Gladney, an African-American conservative who was brutally beaten by 4 individuals, at least 2 of whom were identified as SEIU representatives." This was at the Russ Carnahan meeting in Mehlville last night. "The beatings included racial slurs and required hospitalization of Mr. Gladney. As videos show, the attack was unprovoked and no one retaliated against the union thugs. This attack followed hours of taunts and verbal assaults by SEIU and ACORN members upon citizens gathered to express their views under the First Amendment. We believe this brutal beating is part of an organized plan to suppress dissent to the Administration's planned seizure of the medical industry in the United States."
That's great way to put it: "[T]he Administration's planned seizure of the medical industry in the United States."
"Anyone who believes in non-violent protest, in the rule of law, in the right of black men and women to express conservative political views, in the right to peaceably assemble, to speak freely, and to petition Congress for a redress of grievances is invited to attend. The Tea Party specifically requests the NAACP and the ACLU to come out in support of Kenneth Gladney’s rights which were trampled by [Union] hooligans. We call on Representative Russ Carnahan to denounce the beating. We call on President Obama to denounce the beatings. We call on St. Louis County to prosecute the assailants to fullest extent of the law."
So nobody's backing down here. If anything, they're taking it back to them. St. Louis Tea Party, a press conference and peaceable protest at union headquarters in St. Louis. By the way... (interruption) You want the address? (interruption) You want the...? Mmm-hmmm. No, they just tried to beat him. I watched the video. They just beat him. He's the vendor. He was the guy selling the buttons and so forth, 38 years old, black conservative. This guy has numerous injuries. In the emergency room, the hospital for two days, they say. SEIU union people. (interruption) No, I don't think there's... Well, there were six arrests. I don't know. There was -- this is the place, you know, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter was one of six people arrested. I don't know off the top of my head if any of these hooligans were arrested. Wait a minute now... (mumbling) I don't think so.
At any rate, the St. Louis SEIU Headquarters are at 5585 Pershing Ave. in St. Louis. I'm sure the union members "acted stupidly." The union members were acting very stupidly here. We won't hear that from the administration. Remember, this is Obama's army. This is why they were sent! This is exactly why the union was sent out to these things. There was no violence. There were no people being shoved into walls prior to the union thugs showing up at these events, they were all peaceable. They were loud, but they were all peaceable.
Video in link.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_080709/content/01125110.guest.html
SEIU is the union that has its tentacles throughout the Obama Admin and ACORN. They beat up this black conservative, but does BO say they acted stupidly?=======
Did SEIU Act "Stupidly" in Beating of Black Conservative in St. Louis?
August 7, 2009
"The St. Louis Tea Party will hold a press conference and peaceable protest at [Service Employee International Union] Headquarters [in St. Louis] at Noon Saturday... The protest is to demand justice for Kenneth Gladney, an African-American conservative who was brutally beaten by 4 individuals, at least 2 of whom were identified as SEIU representatives." This was at the Russ Carnahan meeting in Mehlville last night. "The beatings included racial slurs and required hospitalization of Mr. Gladney. As videos show, the attack was unprovoked and no one retaliated against the union thugs. This attack followed hours of taunts and verbal assaults by SEIU and ACORN members upon citizens gathered to express their views under the First Amendment. We believe this brutal beating is part of an organized plan to suppress dissent to the Administration's planned seizure of the medical industry in the United States."
That's great way to put it: "[T]he Administration's planned seizure of the medical industry in the United States."
"Anyone who believes in non-violent protest, in the rule of law, in the right of black men and women to express conservative political views, in the right to peaceably assemble, to speak freely, and to petition Congress for a redress of grievances is invited to attend. The Tea Party specifically requests the NAACP and the ACLU to come out in support of Kenneth Gladney’s rights which were trampled by [Union] hooligans. We call on Representative Russ Carnahan to denounce the beating. We call on President Obama to denounce the beatings. We call on St. Louis County to prosecute the assailants to fullest extent of the law."
So nobody's backing down here. If anything, they're taking it back to them. St. Louis Tea Party, a press conference and peaceable protest at union headquarters in St. Louis. By the way... (interruption) You want the address? (interruption) You want the...? Mmm-hmmm. No, they just tried to beat him. I watched the video. They just beat him. He's the vendor. He was the guy selling the buttons and so forth, 38 years old, black conservative. This guy has numerous injuries. In the emergency room, the hospital for two days, they say. SEIU union people. (interruption) No, I don't think there's... Well, there were six arrests. I don't know. There was -- this is the place, you know, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter was one of six people arrested. I don't know off the top of my head if any of these hooligans were arrested. Wait a minute now... (mumbling) I don't think so.
At any rate, the St. Louis SEIU Headquarters are at 5585 Pershing Ave. in St. Louis. I'm sure the union members "acted stupidly." The union members were acting very stupidly here. We won't hear that from the administration. Remember, this is Obama's army. This is why they were sent! This is exactly why the union was sent out to these things. There was no violence. There were no people being shoved into walls prior to the union thugs showing up at these events, they were all peaceable. They were loud, but they were all peaceable.
Video in link.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_080709/content/01125110.guest.html
