Kind of off subject, but what happens if/when the forest service decides to close Van Epps and North Fork to us? Then later Lake Ann and Gallagher. Will you judge me as some criminal for riding up there? At some point you have to say enough is enough and stand up to unjust laws. Just because some unelected official decides on a rule doesn't make it just. Their ultimate goal is us out of the mountains, period, so why make it easier for them by complying. All this so a couple self righteous *******s a year can ski tour without the risk of possibly seeing one of us or hearing one of us.
Washington has the highest percentage of wilderness land out of any state in the lower 48. Fight for what's left.
The FS is proposing to close those areas because sledders have been using them to poach the wilderness. The skiers are only confirming what the FS already knows. The FS has sleds and they occasionally survey the boundaries, especially in spring. They also have planes. And the problem isn't new. I've personally spoken with the rangers about this issue over the past few years, as have others on this string. There's no conspiracy to get rid of sleds IMO. They simply don't want to deal with the hassle of enforcing the boundaries and will close areas adjacent to wilderness if sledders can't abide by the law. To me, it's unfair to punish us all for the violations of the few, and I plan to do what I can to oppose the wilderness designation for those areas, but it really hurts our cause to have folks continuing to poach.
If you see sledders poaching, let them know that they are jeopardizing everybody's access rights. How you do that is your business.